2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2014.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different screening methods for blood pressure disorders in children and adolescents

Abstract: Screening tools used for the assessment of blood pressure disorders in children and adolescents may be useful to decrease the current rate of underdiagnosis of this condition. The table proposed by Kaelber showed the best results; however, the ratio between BP and height demonstrated specific advantages, as it does not require tables.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, interpretation of some results should be re-assessed. For example, in two validation studies, 22, 23 the authors mentioned that the simplified table by Kaelber et al 16 (which provides 64 BP cut-offs by age and sex) performed best, followed by the BPHR (which provides 4 cutoffs for systolic/diastolic BP in boys/girls) 19 . However, the positive predictive values (PPV) of both methods were lower (Kaelber et al: 16.1%; BPHR: 44.2%) than the simplified methods by Chiolero et al 18 (88.3%) and by Somu et al 14 (86.4%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, interpretation of some results should be re-assessed. For example, in two validation studies, 22, 23 the authors mentioned that the simplified table by Kaelber et al 16 (which provides 64 BP cut-offs by age and sex) performed best, followed by the BPHR (which provides 4 cutoffs for systolic/diastolic BP in boys/girls) 19 . However, the positive predictive values (PPV) of both methods were lower (Kaelber et al: 16.1%; BPHR: 44.2%) than the simplified methods by Chiolero et al 18 (88.3%) and by Somu et al 14 (86.4%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in Brazil, BP monitoring in pediatric age groups is still inadequate and does not cover a large proportion of young people, especially those belonging to the less favored social classes 6 . The reasons for the under-evaluation of BP are little studied, but could be related to the short duration of pediatric appointments, lack of equipment, especially appropriate cuffs for the arm circumference of young people, and the difficulty in interpreting BP values due to their complex classification criterion -based on percentile distribution according to age, gender, and height 7,8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15, 16 However, these simplified methods are either still difficult to use or have low positive predictive values compared with the complex definition specific for sex, age and height percentiles. 1719 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%