Существующие социально-экономические проблемы села обусловливают необходимость изменения государственных программ сельского развития и корректировки концептуальной модели финансово-экономического обеспечения устойчивого развития сельских территорий на принципах инклюзивного роста. В ходе исследования было установлено, что существующая модель финансово-экономического обеспечения сельского развития имеет целый ряд недостатков, обусловленных недостаточностью бюджетного финансирования, слабой диверсификацией сельской экономики и ограниченностью доступа сельского населения и малого бизнеса к финансовым ресурсам, что препятствует выполнению своих функций органами местного самоуправления и подрывает основу финансовой самообеспеченности села. Предлагаемая концептуальная модель финансово-экономического обеспечения устойчивого инклюзивного развития сельских территорий построена на принципах бюджетной децентрализации, финансовой самостоятельности местного самоуправления, обеспечения финансовой инклюзии и гражданского участия в управлении финансовыми ресурсами. Разработанные меры финансово-экономического обеспечения сельского развития направлены на интегрированное решение комплексных проблем, повышение значения местного самоуправления и роли гражданского участия в управлении финансовыми ресурсами бюджетов сельских поселений, а также на развитие сельской экономики. The existing socio-economic problems of the village determine the necessity to change the state programs of rural development and adjust the conceptual model of financial and economic support of sustainable development of rural areas on the principles of inclusive growth. The study found that the existing model of financial and economic support of rural development has a number of drawbacks due to insufficient budget financing, poor diversification of the rural economy and limited access of the rural population and small businesses to financial resources, which prevents local governments from fulfilling their functions and undermines the basis of financial self-sufficiency of the village. The proposed conceptual model of financial and economic provision of sustainable inclusive development of rural areas is based on the principles of budgetary decentralization, financial autonomy of local government, ensuring financial inclusion and civil participation in the management of financial resources. The developed measures of financial and economic provision of rural development are aimed at the integrated solution of complex problems, increasing the importance of local selfgovernment and the role of civil participation in the management of financial resources of budgets of rural settlements, as well as contributing to the development of rural economy.
Abstract. Increasing the level of income and quality of life of the rural population, the creation of comfortable conditions for his residence and ensuring financial inclusiveness is the priority direction of modern state policy. The purpose of the study is an analysis of the state and trends in the development of agricultural credit consumer cooperation, as well as the substantiation of the areas of its further development in the context of increasing financial inclusiveness in the village. Methods. The theoretical and methodological base of the study was the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists on inclusive economic growth, state regulation and the organizational and economic mechanism for the development of agricultural credit consumer cooperation. The study used a systematic approach using methods for analyzing and synthesis, generalizations, comparisons, inductions and deduction, statistical and economic analysis. Results. The dynamics of the development of agricultural credit consumer cooperation in Russia is considered. The reduction in the number of agricultural credit consumer cooperatives (ACCC) under the influence of a number of negative factors, such as: the absence of the state program for their development; transmission of control and supervision functions for their activities in the Central Bank of the Russian Federation; low level of income of rural residents and distrust of credit cooperation; the lack of an insurance system for contributing members of cooperatives, etc. The trend has been identified to increase the loan portfolio of ACCC, which indicates a high need for affordable loans from rural small businesses and the population. These theoretical and empirical studies reflect the close relationship between the development of credit cooperation on the village with a change in the institutional environment. Scientific novelty. The results of the study made it possible to substantiate measures to improve state policies aimed at creating a favorable institutional environment for the development of ACCC. The interrelation of the growth of the financial inclusion of rural areas and the positive dynamics of the development of ACCC is allocated.
The current state of Russian rural territories causes concern due to the numerous socio-economic problems in the countryside. Their solution is one of the most important governmental objectives that require both adequate strategic planning and timely monitoring of the current situation in the countryside. The study was aimed to identify key problems of the socio-economic development of rural territories in Russia based on the inclusive approach. Within the research, the author analyzed the dynamics of 17 indicators of inclusive development of Russian rural territories for the period from 2011 to 2020 united in four blocks: “Growth and Development”, “Economic Inclusion”, “Continuity of Generations and Development Sustainability”, and “Social Inclusion”. The study identified that the priority development of agriculture ensured the growth of gross added value of the industry but did not contribute to the improvement of the quality and living conditions of the rural population. The results of the study showed that along with the growth of labor productivity in agriculture, a decrease in the employment rate in the countryside was observed. At the same time, wages in agriculture were about a third lower than in the economy as a whole. Poverty in the countryside remains one of the most acute problems as it concerns the fifth of the rural residents. Rural settlements fall behind the urban ones in a number of parameters: life expectancy, the level of the population’s employment, the households’ available resources, social and engineering infrastructure. The solution of indicated problems is possible only when updating the existing model of the development of rural areas based on the principles of inclusive development, which to the greatest extent meet the modern-day challenges and threats.
Purpose: to determine the level of involvement and the effectiveness of the participation of rural settlements of municipal districts in regional programs of initiative budgeting. Materials and methods. The methodological basis of this research is dialectical, formal-logical, statistical methods. The empirical basis of the study was made up of data from the reports of the Center for Initiative Budgeting of the Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, the Federal State Statistics Service for Rostov Region, the results of the regional competition of initiative budgeting projects and reports of the regional government on their implementation. Results. The region has developed a legislative and regulatory framework for the initiative budgeting development. The diagnostics of the participatory budgeting development in rural areas of Rostov region is presented: the sources and amounts of initiative projects financing of villages and cities are determined, the ratio of the participating in the competition and the winning projects of rural settlements of municipal districts is determined, the amount of financing of initiative projects from the local budget per one villager is determined. The ratings of the municipal districts of Rostov region for 2020 and 2021 have been prepared by the level of activity of rural settlements and the effectiveness of their participation in initiative budgeting projects. Conclusions: the key factors hindering the development of civic participation of villagers in public finance management have been identified: low level of institutional trust of the rural population, insufficient social activity of villagers in resolving issues of local importance, significant income differentiation of rural and urban residents, low income of local budgets, insufficient competencies of local governments for the preparation of initiative projects. Improving the participatory budgeting mechanism in the region will have positive consequences for socio-economic development of rural areas.
Достаточно новой формой практики муниципального управления в РФ становится партисипаторное бюджетирование, основанное на непосредственном участии граждан в местном самоуправлении. Целью исследования явилось изучение вовлеченности сельского населения в процессы управления сельскими территориями через механизм партисипаторного бюджетирования. Совершенствование системы управления сельским развитием на основе самоорганизации селян с активной гражданской позицией и партисипаторного бюджетирования является важнейшим фактором новой научной модели развития сельских территорий. Представлена диагностика состояния партисипаторного бюджетирования в России, 69 регионов реализуют проекты на основе этого механизма публичного управления общественными финансами, существуют многочисленные успешные практики вовлечения местных сообществ в управление территориальным развитием. Несмотря на то, что в 2019 г. по сравнению с 2014 г. количество реализованных проектов на селе увеличилось вдвое, относительно 2016 года оно уменьшилось почти на 40%. Выявлены ключевые факторы, сдерживающие развитие гражданского участия селян в управлении общественными финансами: недостаточный уровень институционального доверия сельского населения, высокая субсидированность и низкий уровень собственных доходов местных бюджетов, недостаточность компетенций органов местного самоуправления для подготовки инициативных проектов. Participatory budgeting, based on the direct participation of citizens in local selfgovernment, is becoming a fairly new form of municipal governance practice in the Russian Federation. The aim of the study was to study the involvement of the rural population in the management of rural areas through the mechanism of participatory budgeting. Improving the rural development management system based on the self-organization of villagers with an active civic position and participatory budgeting is the most important factor in the new scientific model for the development of rural areas. The diagnostics of the state of participatory budgeting in Russia is presented, 69 regions are implementing projects based on this mechanism of public management of public finances, there are numerous successful practices of involving local communities in the management of territorial development. Despite the fact that in 2019, compared to 2014, the number of implemented projects in rural areas doubled, compared to 2016 it decreased by almost 40%. The key factors hindering the development of civic participation of villagers in the management of public finances were identified: insufficient level of institutional trust of the rural population, high subsidies and low levels of local budgets' own revenues, insufficient competence of local governments to prepare initiative projects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.