Forest stand density has been shown to have different, albeit small, effects on soil carbon. We hypothesized that the absence of a density effect on soil carbon (C) storage could be explained by a loss of old soil C. This replacement of old by fresh C could result in zero net C sequestration by soils but could also alter the quality of the soil organic matter. We used one afforestation experiment in Siberia, in which three tree species (spruce, larch and Scots pine) have been grown for the last 30 years at 18 levels of stand density, ranging originally from 500 to 125,000 stems per ha. We selected five density levels and studied the C and nitrogen (N) contents in mineral soils at 0–5 cm depth. The age of the soil C was measured under larch and spruce for three levels of density by radiocarbon (14C) dating. In all soil samples, we determined the stability of the soil organic matter (SOM) by assessing two indices: C decomposability (mineralization of C per unit of soil C) and primability (susceptibility of the SOM to microbial priming). The stand density affected the soil C and N contents differently depending on the tree species. Only under spruce did both the C and N contents increase with density; under larch and pine, the covariation was insignificant and N even tended to decline with a density increase. With the 14C data, we were able to show the strong dilution of old SOM by fresh C derived from the trees; the effect was stronger with a higher density. This provides the first evidence that a density increase increases the fractions of new C versus old C and this can happen without altering the total C contents such as under larch. Although the stand density altered the soil C and N contents only under spruce, it altered C decomposability under all tree species; with a density increase, the C decomposability declined under spruce but increased under larch and pine. This is relevant to predicting C losses from forest soils with different tree species and densities. Higher C losses would occur under larch and pine with higher densities but under spruce, a density increase would reduce the losses of C from the soil. Furthermore, although no significant covariation of stand density with C primability was detected, we first observed strong tree species effects on C primability. Twice as much C was lost from the soil under larch than under spruce or pine by an equal addition of C-glucose. This indicated that elevated C deposition from roots and exudates to the soil as predicted due to an elevated CO2 concentration would most strongly accelerate the soil C turnover and C losses under larch than under spruce and Scots pine. Overall, the tree species altered the susceptibility of the soil C to an elevated C input and the stand density had a strong effect on the decomposability of the SOM, which is an important parameter of C stability. The effect of stand density is, therefore, important to consider even if the stand density does not affect the total soil C.
<p>Forest stand density has been shown to have different albeit small effects on soil carbon. We hypothesized that the absence of density effect on soil carbon (C) storage can be explained by a loss of old soil C. This replacement of old by fresh C results in zero net C sequestration by soils but could alter the quality of soil organic matter.&#160;&#160; We used one afforestation experiment in Siberia, in which three tree species (spruce, larch and Scots pine) were grown for the last 30 years at 18 levels of stand density, ranging originally from 500 to 125,000 stems per ha. We selected five density levels and studied C and nitrogen (N) contents in mineral soils at 0-5 cm depth. The age of soil C was measured under larch and spruce for three levels of density by radiocarbon (<sup>14</sup>C) dating. In all soil samples we determined stability of soil organic matter (SOM) to mineralization (decomposability) and to elevated input of readily decomposable C &#8211; glucose (primability).&#160; Stand density affected soil C and N contents differently depending on the tree species. Only under spruce both C and N contents were increasing with density, under larch and pine the covariation was insignificant, while N tended even to decline with density increase.&#160; With the <sup>14</sup>C data we were able to show strong dilution of old SOM by fresh C derived from the trees, the effect was stronger with higher density. This provides first evidence that density increase increases the fractions of new C versus old C and this can happen without altering the total C contents like under larch. While stand density altered soil C and N contents only under spruce, it altered C decomposability under all tree species: with density increase the C decomposability (per unit of C) declined under spruce but increased under larch and pine. This is relevant to predicting C losses from forest soils with different tree species and densities.&#160; Higher losses would occur under larch and pine with higher densities, but increase of density under spruce would reduce the C losses from soil. Furthermore, while no significant covariation of stand density with C primability was detected, we first observed strong tree species effects on C primability. Twice as much C is lost from soil under larch than under spruce and pine by equal addition of C-glucose.&#160; This indicates that elevated C deposition from roots and exudates to soil as predicted due to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> concentration would most strongly accelerate soil C turnover and C losses under larch than under spruce and pine. Overall, tree species altered the susceptibility of soil C to elevated C input and stand density had strong effect on the decomposability of SOM, which is important parameter of C stability. The effect of stand density is thus important to consider even if stand density does not affect total soil C content.&#160;</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.