Spatial heterotopy of modern space contributes to the emergence of new communicative patterns in the field of „own – other” contacts. But the persisting traditional ethnic stereotypes conflict with the changing socio-cultural realities. In this article the authors analyze the problem of preservation culture from Stranger. In this regard serious questions raise. These are: what do we keep – either the traditional culture with its internal code or the culture as a whole; what and from whom do we protect – either the traditional culture from globalization challenges, or „our own culture” from the Other; and, at last, how do we protect it – either carefully saving from innovations or actively breaking all traditional forms clearing away the road for innovative development? Anyway rhizome world view becomes the factor that significantly complicates adaptation of NeoStranger into the receiving societies. It demands theoretical comprehension of a new strategy of cross-cultural communication in modern transcultural space.
Статья посвящена сравнительному анализу качества древнегреческой и древнеримской аристократической культуры. Рассматриваются ведущие ценности греческой аристократии - «аретэ», калокагатия, этос. Воспитание эстетических взглядов, социальная ответственность и хорошее образование способствовали формированию аристократии духа. Именно греческие аристократы создали высокую культуру, являющуюся основанием мировой классики.
В противоположность Греции, аристократизм в Риме обуславливается происхождением и материальным состоянием. Практически все достижения в науке, философии, искусстве было заимствовано у греков и низведено до уровня, доступного массовому сознанию. Римские аристократы любили комфорт и роскошь, уделяя большое внимание общественной жизни и военной карьере. В Римской империи материальный прогресс опережал духовное развитие общества. И если древняя Греция продемонстрировала всему миру аристократию духа, создавшую высокую культуру, ставшую основой мирового классического наследия, то в древнем Риме основным занятием аристократов была политика и война.
The multivalence of interpretations of identity depends on the context of consideration. The primordialist approach to explaining identity is gradually giving way to a constructivist approach in which identity is seen as a social construct. "Multiple" identity means transcending one's ethnoculture and diffusing original identities. It is almost impossible to create a stable "map of identities," but the more important is the process of making sense of it from a contemporary perspective. The transformation of identities is clearly visible in the post-Soviet space, which is an area of vital interest for Russia. The modern post-Soviet space is a conflict-prone zone, where the interests of many world powers, are concentrated.
The search for a new national identity is closely connected with the assertion of the symbolic status of the people in world history, which is why the role of education is so important. The article analyzes the Russian and Kazakh federal state educational standards of education (FSES) and Educational Development Strategies and reveals their specificity. The priority of the State Compulsory Standard of Russia is the formation of civil identity, while in Kazakhstan we note the dominance of the ethnic component of identity.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.