Compared with commercial lithium batteries with liquid electrolytes, all-solidstate lithium batteries (ASSLBs) possess the advantages of higher safety, better electrochemical stability, higher energy density, and longer cycle life; therefore, ASSLBs have been identified as promising candidates for next-generation safe and stable high-energy-storage devices. The design and fabrication of solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) are vital for the future commercialization of ASSLBs. Among various SSEs, solid polymer composite electrolytes (SPCEs) consisting of inorganic nanofillers and polymer matrix have shown great application prospects in the practice of ASSLBs. The incorporation of inorganic nanofillers into the polymer matrix has been considered as a crucial method to achieve high ionic conductivity for SPCE. In this review, the mechanisms of Li + transport variation caused by incorporating inorganic nanofillers into the polymer matrix are discussed in detail. On the basis of the recent progress, the respective contributions of polymer chains, passive ceramic nanofillers, and active ceramic nanofillers in affecting the Li + transport process of SPCE are reviewed systematically. The inherent relationship between the morphological characteristics of inorganic nanofillers and the ionic conductivity of the resultant SPCE is discussed. Finally, the challenges and future perspectives for developing high-performance SPCE are put forward. This review aims to provide possible strategies for the further improvement of ionic conductivity in inorganic nanoscale filler-reinforced SPCE and highlight their inspiration for future research directions. K E Y W O R D Sall-solid-state lithium batteries, inorganic nanofillers, Li + transportation, solid polymer composite electrolyteThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

No abstract

Salicylaldimine-modified mesoporous silica (Sal-MCM-3 and Sal-MCM-9) was prepared through a co-condensation method with different amounts of added salicylaldimine. With the coordination from the salicylaldimine, zinc ions were impregnated on Sal-MCM-3 and Sal-MCM-9. Then, Zn-Sal-MCM-3 and Zn-Sal-MCM-9 were calcined to obtain nano-zinc oxide loaded on mesoporous silica (ZnO-MCM-3 and ZnO-MCM-9). The material structures were systematically studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), N2 adsorption/desorption measurements, X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), zeta potential, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), ultraviolet diffused reflectance spectrum (UV-vis DRS), and thermogravimetry (TGA). Methyl orange (MO) was used to investigate the photocatalysis behavior of ZnO-MCM-3 and ZnO-MCM-9. The results confirmed that nano ZnO was loaded in the channels as well as the outside surface of mesoporous silica (MCM-41). The modification of salicylaldimine helped MCM-41 to load more nano ZnO on MCM-41. When the modification amount of salicylaldimine was one-ninth and one-third of the mass of the silicon source, respectively, the load of nano ZnO on ZnO-MCM-9 and ZnO-MCM-3 had atomic concentrations of 1.27 and 2.03, respectively. ZnO loaded on ZnO-MCM-9 had a wurtzite structure, while ZnO loaded on ZnO-MCM-3 was not in the same crystalline group. The blocking effect caused by nano ZnO in the channels reduced the orderliness of MCM-41. The photodegradation of MO can be divided in two processes, which are mainly controlled by the surface areas of ZnO-MCM and the loading amount of nano ZnO, respectively. The pseudo-first-order model was more suitable for the photodegradation process.

No abstract

Silanized iminodiacetic acid (GLYMO–IDA) modified mesoporous silica (G-SBA) was prepared following a co-condensation method.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract