The role of serum cystatin C (Scys) for the detection of acute kidney injury (AKI) has not been fully discussed. This meta-analysis was aimed to investigate the overall diagnostic accuracy of Scys for AKI in adults, and further identify factors affecting its performance. Studies before Sept. 2016 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. A total of 30 prospective cohort studies (involving 4247 adults from 15 countries, 982 patients occurring AKI) were included. The revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tools demonstrated no significant bias had influenced the methodological quality of the included studies. Scys showed a high predictive power for all-cause AKI, that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89. The detailed assessment parameters, such as sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio for Scys were 0.82, 0.82, 4.6, 0.22 and 21, respectively. Although Scys could be slightly influenced by the following factors: settings, AKI diagnostic criteria, ethnicity, determination method, age and gender, these factors above did not reach statistically significance. In conclusion, Scys could be a vital promising marker to screen out AKI.

IntroductionFew studies focused on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. This study was conducted to survey the prevalence, the potent risk factors of MCI in MHD patients, and further observe the progress of MCI in a period of 6 months.MethodologyMini-Mental State Examination, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were used to assess cognitive condition. MHD patients were enrolled from The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, who had a stable hemodialysis history for more than 3 months.ResultsSixty-four MHD patients and 54 general subjects were finally included. The average age of both groups was more than 60 years. The prevalence of MCI in the MHD group was significantly higher than that in general population (60.9% vs 29.6%, P<0.05). Spearman correlation analysis indicated that MCI was related to age, comorbidities, education years, uric acid, serum albumin, and blood pressure. The prevalence and severity of MCI in the MHD group remained unchanged during the 6 months (prevalence: 59.5%–66.6%, MoCA scores: 22.9–22.5).ConclusionMHD patients sustain a fairly high prevalence of MCI. Multiple risk factors influence the incidence and progression of MCI in MHD patients. More attention should be paid to this special population.

ObjectiveThe role of neutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin (NGAL) for the evaluation of renal function in chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not yet to be determined. We aimed to perform a meta‐analysis exploring the correlation between NGAL and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in CKD patients, and to further identify factors affecting NGAL's performance.MethodsStudies dated before November 2017 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. A total of 28 relevant studies (involving 3082 patients from 17 countries) were included. The second version of the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy demonstrated that no significant bias had influenced the methodological quality of the included studies.ResultsNeutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin showed a strong negative correlation with measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR). The pooled correlation coefficient (r) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals for the correlation between serum NGAL (sNGAL) and GFR was −0.48, meanwhile that for urine NGAL (uNGAL) and GFR was −0.34. However, NGAL's performance is different in subgroups restricted by clinical settings, race, sex, age, and staging of renal function.ConclusionNeutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin could be a renal function evaluation marker for patients with renal dysfunction in CKD. Compared with uNGAL, there was a significant negative correlation between sNGAL and GFR. The performances of sNGAL and uNGAL were restricted by clinical factors that should be considered in regards to the sampling source selection.

No abstract