Background: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR) has been shown as a feasible parameter associated with outcomes of tumor patients and an accessible predictor of bacteremia. However, only a handful of research shed the light on the association between NLCR and outcomes of septic patients. This study is aimed to evaluate the association between NLCR and all-cause mortality in a population of adult septic patients. Methods: We extracted clinical data from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III V1.4, a free, large-scale, single-center database. NLCR was computed individually. Patients were categorized by quartiles of NLCR. The associations between NLCR quartiles and 28-day all-cause mortality in septic patients were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and subgroup analyzes. To evaluate the accuracy of NLCR in predicting 28-day mortality of sepsis, receiver operator characteristic curves (ROC), areas under the curve (AUC), and the Youden's J Index were calculated. Other outcomes included 7-day allcause mortality, mortality in the intensive care units (ICU), in-hospital mortality and length of ICU stay.Results: A total of 3,043 eligible patients were included in the study, of which, 760, 759, 766 and 758 patients were fallen in the first quartile (≤5.89), the second quartile (>5.89, ≤10.69), the third quartile (>10.69, ≤20.25) and the fourth quartile (>20.25) of NLCR, respectively. The 7-day mortality (13.4%, 9.9%, 13.6% and 14.2%; P=0.064) showed no difference in the four quartiles. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounding factors, the highest NLCR quartile (>20.25) was associated with increased 28-day all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.22, 95% Cl: 1.01-1.49; P=0.046]. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) for NLCR was 0.553 (95% CI: 0.529-0.576) for 28-day mortality.Conclusions: High NLCR (>20.25) is independently related to increased 28-day all-cause mortality in adult septic patients of a limited sensibility and specificity. Further large multi-center prospective studies are needed to confirm such relationship and to validate whose clinical significance.
BackgroundExtubation to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been investigated as a strategy to wean critically ill adults from invasive ventilation and reduce ventilator-related complications.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, proceedings of four conferences and bibliographies (to June 2020) for randomised and quasi-randomised trials that compared extubation with immediate application of NIV to continued invasive weaning in intubated adults and reported mortality (primary outcome) or other outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened citations, assessed trial quality and abstracted data.ResultsWe identified 28 trials, of moderate-to-good quality, involving 2066 patients, 44.6% with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Non-invasive weaning significantly reduced mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.74; high quality), weaning failures (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.81; high quality), pneumonia (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.41; high quality), intensive care unit (ICU) (mean difference (MD) −4.62 days, 95% CI −5.91 to −3.34) and hospital stay (MD −6.29 days, 95% CI −8.90 to −3.68). Non-invasive weaning also significantly reduced the total duration of ventilation, duration of invasive ventilation and duration of ventilation related to weaning (MD −0.57, 95% CI −1.08 to −0.07) and tracheostomy rate. Mortality, pneumonia, reintubation and ICU stay were significantly lower in trials enrolling COPD (vs mixed) populations.ConclusionNon-invasive weaning significantly reduced mortality, pneumonia and the duration of ventilation related to weaning, particularly in patients with COPD. Beneficial effects are less clear (or more careful patient selection is required) in non-COPD patients.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020201402.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.