Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is considered a useful tool for planning electrode placement for chronic intracranial subdural electrocorticography (ECoG) in candidates for epilepsy surgery or even as a substitute for ECoG. MEG recordings are usually interictal and therefore, at best, reflect the interictal ECoG. To estimate the clinical value of MEG, it is important to know how well interictal MEG reflects interictal activity in the ECoG. From 1998 to 2008, 38 candidates for ECoG underwent a 151-channel MEG recording and 3D magnetic resonance imaging as a part of their presurgical evaluation. Interictal MEG spikes were identified, clustered, averaged and modelled using the multiple signal classification algorithm and co-registered to magnetic resonance imaging. ECoG was continuously recorded with electrode grids and strips for approximately 1 week. In a representative sample of awake interictal ECoG, interictal spikes were identified and averaged. The different spikes were characterized and quantified using a combined amplitude and synchronous surface-area measure. The ECoG spikes were ranked according to this measure and plotted on the magnetic resonance imaging surface rendering. Interictal spikes in MEG and ECoG were allocated to a predefined anatomical brain region and an association analysis was performed. All interictal MEG spikes were associated with an interictal ECoG spike. Overall, 56% of all interictal ECoG spikes had an interictal MEG counterpart. The association between the two was >or=90% in the interhemispheric and frontal orbital region, approximately 75% in the superior frontal, central and lateral temporal regions, but only approximately 25% in the mesial temporal region. MEG is a reliable indicator of the presence of interictal ECoG spikes and can be used to plan intracranial electrode placements. However, a substantial number of interictal ECoG spikes are not detected by MEG, and therefore MEG cannot be considered a substitute for ECoG.
MEG interictal spikes as recorded in epilepsy patients are a reflection of intracranial interictal activity. This study investigates the relationship between the estimated sources of MEG spikes and the location, distribution and size of interictal spikes in the invasive ECoG of a group of 38 epilepsy patients that are monitored for pre-surgical evaluation. An amplitude/surface area measure is defined to quantify and rank ECoG spikes. It is found that all MEG spikes are associated with an ECoG spike that is among the three highest ranked in a patient. Among the different brain regions considered, the fronto-orbital, inter-hemispheric, tempero-lateral and central regions stand out. In an accompanying simulation study it is shown that for hypothesized extended sources of larger sizes, as suggested by the data, source location, orientation and curvature can partly explain the observed sensitivity of MEG for interictal spikes.
To investigate if Magnetoencephalography (MEG) can add non-redundant information to guide implantation sites for intracranial recordings (IR). The contribution of MEG to intracranial recording planning was evaluated in 12 consecutive patients assessed pre-surgically with MEG followed by IR. Primary outcome measures were the identification of focal seizure onset in IR and favorable surgical outcome. Outcome measures were compared to those of 12 patients matched for implantation type in whom non-invasive pre-surgical assessment suggested clear hypotheses for implantation (non-MEG group). In the MEG group, non-invasive assessment without MEG was inconclusive, and MEG was then used to further help identify implantation sites. In all MEG patients, at least one virtual MEG electrode generated suitable hypotheses for the location of implantations. No differences in outcome measures were found between non-MEG and MEG groups. Although the MEG group included more complex patients, it showed similar percentage of successful implantations as the non-MEG group. This suggests that MEG can contribute to identify implantation sites where standard methods failed.
OBJECTIVE The high prevalence and impact of neurodevelopmental comorbidities in childhood epilepsy are now well known, as are the increased risks and familial aggregation of reading disability (RD) and speech sound disorder (SSD) in rolandic epilepsy (RE). The risk factors for RD in the general population include male sex, SSD and ADHD but it is not known if these are the same in RE or whether there is a contributory role of seizure and treatment related variables. METHODS An observational study of 108 RE probands (age range 3.6–22 years) and their 159 siblings (age range 1–29 years; 83 with EEG data) singly ascertained in the US or UK through an affected RE proband. We used a nested case-control design, multiple logistic regression and generalized estimating equations to test the hypothesis of association between RD and seizure variables or antiepileptic drug treatment in RE; we also assessed an association between EEG focal sharp waves and RD in siblings. RESULTS RD was reported in 42% of probands and 22% of siblings. Among probands, RD was strongly associated with a history of SSD (OR 9.64, 95% CI: 2.45–37.21), ADHD symptoms (OR 10.31, 95% CI: 2.15–49.44), and male sex (OR 3.62, 95% CI: 1.11–11.75), but not with seizure or treatment variables. Among siblings, RD was independently associated only with SSD (OR 4.30, 95%CI: 1.42–13.0) and not with the presence of interictal EEG focal sharp waves. SIGNIFICANCE The principal risk factors for RD in RE are SSD, ADHD and male sex, the same risk factors as for RD without epilepsy. Seizure or treatment variables do not appear to be important risk factors for RD in RE probands, and there was no evidence to support interictal EEG focal sharp waves as a risk factor for RD in siblings. Future studies should focus on the precise neuropsychological characterisation of RD in RE families, and on the effectiveness of standard oral-language and reading interventions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.