A statewide encephalitis diagnostic project of the California State Department of Health Services found that herpes simplex virus 1 DNA may not be detectable by molecular methods early in the clinical course of herpes simplex encephalitis.

We describe 4 patients with encephalitis due to possible reactivation of human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infection who were enrolled in the California Encephalitis Project. All were immunocompetent and had HHV-6 loads determined in cerebrospinal fluid specimens. Tests for detection of HHV-6 should be considered for individuals with encephalitis.

Agreement between assays for the detection of human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) antibodies has been limited. In part, this disagreement has been because assay calibration (i.e., differentiating positive from negative results) has not been done in a standardized fashion with reference to a wide spectrum of HHV-8-infected (true-positive) and HHV-8-uninfected (true-negative) persons. To describe the performance of an assay for HHV-8 antibodies more accurately, we used epidemiologically well-characterized subjects in conjunction with testing on two existing immunofluorescence assays for HHV-8 antibodies to define two groups: a group of 135 HHV-8-infected individuals (true positives), including Kaposi's sarcoma patients and those asymptomatically infected, and a group of 234 individuals with a high likelihood of being HHV-8 uninfected (true negatives). A new enzyme immunoassay (EIA), using lysed HHV-8 virion as the antigen target, was then developed. With the above true positives and true negatives as references, the sensitivity and specificity of the EIA associated with different cutoff values were determined. At the cutoff that maximized both sensitivity and specificity, sensitivity was 94% and specificity was 93%. When the EIA was used to test a separate validation group, a distribution of seropositivity that matched that predicted for the agent of Kaposi's sarcoma was observed: 55% of homosexual men were seropositive, versus 6% seropositivity in a group of children, women, and heterosexual men. It is proposed that the EIA has utility for large-scale use in a number of settings and that the calibration method described can be used for other assays, both to more accurately describe the performance of these assays and to permit more-valid interassay comparison.

The recombinant DNA-derived, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigen-based immunoblot assay (RIBA-HIV216) is a new supplemental (confirmatory) test developed to detect antibodies to HIV-1. The assay employs four recombinant viral antigens, corresponding to HIV-1 p24, p31, p41 and gp120 proteins, in an immunoblot format. With this assay, HIV-1 antigen reactivity was detected in all 683 infected patient serum or plasma specimens evaluated; 665 (97.6%) of these sera met the criteria for a positive interpretation, and 18 (2.6%) were classified as indeterminate. All 683 samples reacted with the recombinant gp41-equivalent protein. The first sequential enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-reactive samples collected from 33 seroconverting homosexual men reacted on RIBA-HIV216. Eleven (1.1%) of 999 EIA-negative blood donor sera reacted weakly with a single recombinant antigen (p24 or p31), whereas 13 to 48 percent had indeterminate reactions on viral lysate Western blots. One (1.5%) of 66 EIA-positive, Western blot-negative blood donor samples and 19 (29%) of 66 EIA-positive, Western blot-indeterminate blood donor samples scored indeterminate on RIBA-HIV216. Nonspecific reactivity was seen with only 1 (0.8%) of 114 patient sera containing possible interfering antibodies, whereas 33 percent of these samples had indeterminate reactions on Western blot and 35 percent had equivocal reactions on immunofluorescence assay (IFA). We conclude that the RIBA-HIV216 is approximately as sensitive as and significantly more specific than virus-derived Western blot and IFA. The RIBA-HIV216 also allows for semiquantitation of specific antibodies that may be of value in clinical staging and therapeutic monitoring.

No abstract