Background The spread of COVID‐19 as an infectious disease brings about many newly arrived challenges, which call for further research on the scope of its effect on life due to the special conditions of this disease. The present study is, therefore, an attempt to understand the lived experience of inpatients hospitalized with COVID‐19. Method In this phenomenological study, among patients with COVID‐19 who were hospitalized in COVID‐19 referral hospitals, 17 people were selected by random sampling method. Data were gathered by interviews and analysed using MAXQDA10 software. Findings Analysis revealed 4 main themes and 16 subthemes. Main themes included the (1) denial of the disease, (2) negative emotions upon arrival, (3) perception of social and psychological supports and (4) post‐discharge concerns and problems. Conclusion Patients with COVID‐19 experience a different world of stresses, concerns and feelings in the course of their disease. Gaining a deeper insight into patients’ experiences with this disease can help handle this disease more effectively and provide better post‐corona nursing and psychological care and services.

BACKGROUND:Admission, discharge and, transfer (ADT) process is one of the most important hospital workflows. ADT system is a part of a hospital information system (HIS).AIM:The objective of this study was to evaluate the usability of the ADT system.METHODS:The study performed at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS) hospitals. Data collection instrument was a validated checklist of Pierotti heuristic evaluation. To determine the severity of usability problems, a hybrid of Nielson and Tampere unit for computer-human interaction (TAUCHI) severity scaling algorithm was used. Usability problems were divided into five categories (major, severe, minor, cosmetic, and technical). Six experts evaluated the ADT system independently. According to TAUCHI severity scale, if a feature has not yet been implemented in the ADT system, evaluators considered it a technical usability problem. Therefore, usability problems due to non-design feature in the ADT system were identified. Finally, the mean severity of each usability problems was calculated.RESULTS:A total of 186 usability problems were identified. The frequency of major, sever, minor and cosmetic usability problems were 2, 65, 69 and 50, respectively. A total of 55 usability problems by the evaluators were recognised as technical problems. The highest mismatch with usability principles was related to the “recognition rather than recall”. The range of the mean severity of usability problems was between 0-2.31.CONCLUSIONS:Our result showed that although implementation of IHIS on a large scale, it still suffered from unresolved usability problems. Identification of usability problems and evaluation of their level of severity, which was simultaneously performed in this study, can be used as a guide to evaluate the usability of other HISs.

In recent years, there has been considerable attention towards the development of information and communication technology (ICT) in health care delivery known as 'E-Health'. The term "E-Health" is almost a new concept and the E-Health projects mainly aim to improve service delivery to people, though different countries might have different approaches in using E-Health. The focus of this study is to review factors influencing the development of E-Health projects, as these factors could lead to an extensive semantic variation. This study reviews the E-Health status in different countries based on existing reports and documents about E-health projects in developed and developing countries and also based on the reports and documents provided by WHO, International Telecommunication Union (ITU); and World Bank. The review of the documents showed that the E-Health status in different countries is depended upon three key factors including the potential of ICT, economic capacity and the level of health status. The review of the documents indicated that there might be different meanings for the concept of E-Health in different countries, and the semantic variation in E-Health concept is related to the level of E-Health developments and implementations. Therefore, developing a clear definition of E-Health is needed.

BACKGROUND: Hospital Information System (HIS) is a type of health information system which is widely used in clinical settings. Determining the success rate of HISs is an ongoing area of research since its implications are of interest for researchers, physicians and managers. AIM: In the present study, we develop a novel instrument to measure HIS success rate based on users’ viewpoints in a teaching hospital. METHODS: The study was conducted in Ebnesina and Dr Hejazi Psychiatric Hospital and education centre in Mashhad, Iran. The instrument for data collection was a self-administered structured questionnaire based on ISSM, covering seven dimensions, which includes system quality, information quality, service quality, system use, usefulness, satisfaction, and net benefits. The verification of content validity was carried out by an expert panel. The internal consistency of dimensions was measured by Cronbach’s alpha. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the significance of associations between dimensions. The HIS success rate on users’ viewpoints was determined. RESULTS: A total of 125 users participated in the study. The instrument was validated by an expert panel with the Content Validity Index (CVI): 0.85 and Content Validity Ratio (CVR): 0.86. The overall Cronbach’s alpha value of the instrument was 0.93. The Pearson correlation coefficient showed significant positive relationships among the investigated dimensions. On average, HIS success rate in the hospital under study was 65% (CI: 64%, 67%). The dimensions of “usefulness”, “system quality”, and “net benefits” showed the highest rates of success, respectively. CONCLUSION: The instrument used in this study can be adopted for HIS evaluation in future studies. In the current study, a method was developed to determine the HIS success rate based on users’ viewpoints. This method allows for the comparison of HIS success rates in various hospitals. As well, our findings underscore the viewpoints of HIS users in a developing country.

No abstract

Background Understanding the hospital EHR success rate has great benefits for hospitals. The present study aimed to 1-Propose an extended-ISSM framework and a questionnaire in a systematic manner for EHR evaluation based on nurses’ perspectives, 2-Determine the EHR success rate, and 3-Explore the effective factors contributing to EHR success. Methods The proposed framework was developed using ISSM, TAM3, TTF, HOT-FIT, and literature review in seven steps. A self-administrated structured 65-items questionnaire was developed with CVI: 90.27% and CVR: 94.34%. Construct validity was conducted using EFA and CFA. Eleven factors were identified, collectively accounting for 71.4% of the total variance. In the EFA step, 15 questions and two questions in EFA were excluded. Finally, 48 items remained in the framework including dimensions of technology, human, organization, ease of use, usefulness, and net benefits. The overall Cronbach’s alpha value was 93.4%. In addition, the hospital EHR success rate was determined and categorized. In addition, effective factors on EHR success were explored. Results In total, 86 nurses participated in the study. On average, the “total hospital EHR success rate” was moderate. The total EHR success rates was ranging from 47.09 to 74.96%. The results of the Kruskal–Wallis test showed that there was a significant relationship between “gender” and “self-efficacy” (p-value: 0.042). A reverse relation between “years of experience using computers” and “training” (p-value: 0.012) was observed. “Years of experience using EHR” as well as “education level” (p-value: 0.001) and “ease of use” had a reverse relationship (p-value: 0.034). Conclusions Our findings underscore the EHR success based on nurses’ viewpoint in a developing country. Our results provide an instrument for comparison of EHR success rates in various hospitals.

Introduction: Psychiatric emergencies are acute mental health disturbances, behaviors and social relationships that require immediate intervention. The major role of the psychiatric emergency services is to provide mental health care services for patients with acute mental health problems. Design in the emergency psychiatry core data set has improved the coordination and integration of services and improved the outcomes for patients with severe and persistent mental illness and with complex needs. So, the aim of this study was to design data elements in emergency psychiatry for Iran. Methods: This is an applied study. Emergency psychiatry data elements collected via literature review and then psychologist and psychiatrist (16 persons) according to the value of each data element, assign a score from 0 to 5 to them. Data elements selected as core Emergency psychiatry data elements were those which achieved a 4 or 5 score from 75% of the specialist. Results: From a total of 95 usability problems identified, three evaluators identified 82 problems (86.3%), 2 evaluators identified 6 problems (6.3%) and one evaluator identified 7 problems (7.3%). According to severity, problems were 23 minor, 19 severe, 16 cosmetic and 37 technical problems. Rate of problems in different areas were: visibility of system status 13.6%, match between system and the real world 12.6%, user control and freedom 14.7%, consistency and standards 11.5%, error prevention 6.3%, recognition rather than recall 12.6%, flexibility and efficiency of use 5.2 %, aesthetic and minimalist design 6.3%, help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors 7.3% and help and documentation 6.3%. Conclusion: Given the importance of psychiatric disorder and lack of a national system for gathering psychiatric information, performing a similar study about psychiatric data element is very important. The results of this study can be used for the design of psychiatric emergency forms and accurate and complete patient information gathering.

No abstract