Environmental factors are believed to explain a large proportion of breast cancer incidence. Known risk factors for breast cancer, which are related to the reproductive life of women, and other factors, such as inheritance and socioeconomic status, explain only about half of the breast cancer cases in the US. Ionizing radiation is a well established environmental risk factor for breast cancer. Chemicals that induce mammary cancer in rodents have served as leads for studies in humans, but occupational and environmental exposure to these chemicals have for the most part lacked association with breast cancer risk. However, there is recent evidence in rats that cadmium at very low doses acts as an estrogen mimic, indicating a need to investigate the effects of metals on breast cancer risk. Studies suggest that circadian rhythm disruption is linked with breast cancer, but too few studies have been done to be conclusive. Over the years, cigarette smoking as a risk factor for breast cancer has remained controversial. However, recent research has found passive smoke exposure to be associated with increased breast cancer risk, which is hypothesized to be accounted for on the basis of an antiestrogenic effect of smoking. Solar radiation has been noted to be associated with reduced breast cancer, supporting the hypothesis that vitamin D plays a protective role in reducing this risk. Although, most of the environmental factors discussed in this review have not been convincingly found to influence breast cancer risk, research suggests that environmental exposure in combination with genetic pre-disposition, age at exposure, and hormonal milieu have a cumulative effect on breast cancer risk.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of an educational program for improving medical event reporting attitude and behavior in the ambulatory care setting among graduate medical trainees. Design: One group pre-and post-test study. Setting: The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas Family Medicine Residency Program. Participants: All family practice residents (n = 30). Intervention: Patient safety educational program implemented through an introductory lecture and 6 monthly conferences, June to December 2002, involving medical events that occurred in the ambulatory care setting. Outcome measures: Medical event reporting attitude and behavior at baseline and at 6 month follow up, and barriers to medical event reporting at the 6 month follow up. Results: Program attendance was significantly correlated with medical event reporting attitude and behavior change (rho = 0.525, p = 0.003). The median change in medical event reporting attitude and behavior was zero and not statistically significant (p = 0.566). Major barriers to medical event reporting were lack of time, extra paper work, and concern about career and personal reputation. Conclusions: Attending the patient safety educational program was key for promoting a positive medical event reporting attitude and behavior change among graduate trainees. Major barriers to medical event reporting were lack of time, extra paper work, and concern about career and personal reputation. Future research will need to focus on reducing these barriers and to evaluate the effectiveness of such a program over longer periods of time, since making a positive change in medical event reporting attitude and behavior must be made at the individual and organizational levels.A report from the Institute of Medicine in 1999, To Err is Human, emphasizes that incorporating patient safety education into clinical training programs is a key mechanism for improving patient safety.1 Furthermore, it is recommended that the initial exposure to patient safety should occur early in undergraduate and graduate medical education programs and be ongoing through continuing medical education. 2Multiple activities can be directed towards understanding the causes of medical events and ultimately their potential role in promoting patient safety, which include team training programs, information technology improvements, and medical event reporting programs. 3In tandem with these activities, individual and organizational attitudes must promote a supportive patient safety culture. This study focuses on one dimension of patient safety culture-namely, the attitude and behavior towards the reporting of medical events by graduate medical trainees.Past case studies have shown that medical events involving graduate trainees (known in the US as interns, residents, and fellows) have the potential for causing harm to recipients of health care. Fortunately, most medical events do not progress to cause patient harm due to the timely intervention by the graduate trainees themselves, other members of t...

The model presented in this article advances quality of care measure development by using: (i) qualitative research to characterize the pertinent antecedents of medical care; and (ii) as many of the pertinent antecedents of medical care as possible to develop risk adjustment models for measuring outcomes that are more likely to identify the true linkages between the processes and outcomes of care. Knowing the linkages between the processes and outcomes of care would provide the information needed to develop valid quality of care measures, so that quality can be measured accurately and the groundwork for its improvement can be laid.

Physical activity reduces breast cancer risk. Promoter hypermethylation of the tumor suppressor genes APC and RASSF1A, which is potentially reversible, is associated with breast cancer risk. We conducted a cross-sectional study in 45 women without breast cancer to determine the association of physical activity with promoter hypermethylation of APC and RASSF1A in breast tissue. We used quantitative methylation-specific PCR to test the methylation status of APC and RASSF1A, and questionnaires to assess study covariates and physical activity (measured in metabolic equivalent hours per week). In univariate analyses, the study covariate, benign breast biopsy number, was positively associated with promoter hypermethylation of APC (P = 0.01) but not RASSF1A. Mulitvariate logistic regression indicated that, although not significant, physical activities for a lifetime [odds ratio (OR), 0.57; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.22-1.45; P = 0.24], previous 5 years (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.34-1.12; P = 0.11), and previous year (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.43-1.22; P = 0.22) were inversely related to promoter hypermethylation of APC but not RASSF1A for all physical activity measures. Univariate logistic regression indicated that physical activities for a lifetime, previous 5 years, and previous year were inversely associated with benign breast biopsy number, and these results were approaching significance for lifetime physical activity (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.16-1.01; P = 0.05) and significant for physical activity in the previous 5 years (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.94; P = 0.03). The study provides indirect evidence supporting the hypothesis that physical activity is inversely associated with promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes, such as APC, in nonmalignant breast tissue. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(2):192 -6)

Styrene was the most important environmental toxicant positively associated with invasive breast cancer incidence in Texas, likely involving women and men of all ages. Styrene may be an important breast carcinogen due to its widespread use for food storage and preparation, and its release from building materials, tobacco smoke, and industry.

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2013;26(2):95-99Cancer care is expensive due to the high costs of treatment and preventable utilization of resources. Government, employer groups, and insurers are seeking cancer care delivery models that promote both cost-efficiency and quality care. Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas (BUMC), a large tertiary care hospital, in collaboration with Texas Oncology, a large private oncology practice, established two independent centers that function cooperatively within the Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, the Oncology Evaluation and Treatment Center (OETC) and Infusion Center, to deliver urgent care and infusions after hours to oncology patients. Quality measures based on evidence-based care and cost-efficiency measures were implemented within these centers. Ability to meet predetermined goals for these measures will be a guide for implementing continuous quality and cost-efficiency interventions. During the first two quarters of operations, 2023 patients received care in the OETC (n = 423) and Infusion Center (n = 1600). The average time spent in the OETC was 48% less than the time spent in the BUMC emergency department (ED). Eighty-nine percent of the cancer center's patients who received urgent care at BUMC were referred to the OETC for this care, instead of the BUMC ED. The hospital admission rate in the OETC was 59% lower than it was in the BUMC ED, a high-volume level I trauma center. The addition of the OETC and Infusion Center to the cancer center holds promise for providing continuous quality cancer care that is cost-efficient.

It is estimated that almost 1.5 million people in the USA are diagnosed with cancer every year. However, due to the substantial effect of modifiable lifestyle factors on the most prevalent cancers, it has been estimated that 50% of cancer is preventable. Physical activity, weight loss, and a reduction in alcohol use can strongly be recommended for the reduction of breast cancer risk. Similarly, weight loss, physical activity, and cessation of tobacco use are important behavior changes to reduce colorectal cancer risk, along with the potential benefit for the reduction of red meat consumption and the increase in folic acid intake. Smoking cessation is still the most important prevention intervention for reducing lung cancer risk, but recent evidence indicates that increasing physical activity may also be an important prevention intervention for this disease. The potential benefit of lifestyle change to reduce prostate cancer risk is growing, with recent evidence indicating the importance of a diet rich in tomato-based foods and weight loss. Also, in the cancers for which there are established lifestyle risk factors, such as physical inactivity for breast cancer and obesity for colorectal cancer, there is emerging information on the role that genetics plays in interacting with these factors, as well as the interaction of combinations of lifestyle factors. Integration of genetic information into lifestyle factors can help to clarify the causal relationships between lifestyle and genetic factors and assist in better identifying cancer risk, ultimately leading to better-informed choices about effective methods to enhance health and prevent cancer.

Physical activity is a protective factor for breast cancer. Exposure to estrogen is an important determinant of breast cancer risk and exercise reduces estrogen levels, with the level of evidence being stronger for post-menopausal women. Possible mechanisms for estrogen induced breast cancer include increased breast epithelial cell proliferation, the metabolism of estrogen to genotoxic metabolites, such as DNA-adducts, and the silencing of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) that have been implicated in breast carcinogenesis by inducing gene promoter hypermethylation, which is potentially reversible. Animal studies suggest that physical activity decreases breast tumor growth by promoting changes in cellular proliferation and apoptosis. Human studies provide some support for exercise producing favorable changes in estrogen metabolism that may lead to reduced breast epithelial cell proliferation. No studies have been performed to determine whether exercise decreases the accumulation of estrogen metabolite DNA-adducts in breast tissue. However, research supports the hypothesis that physical activity reduces promoter hypermethylation of TSGs implicated in breast carcinogenesis by lowering circulating estrogen levels. Thus, further research is necessary to clarify the mechanisms that relate to physical activity as a negative modulator of breast cancer risk to develop meaningful guidelines for the use of physical activity in breast cancer prevention.