No abstract

No abstract

The psychophysical lifting capacity (MAWL) of twelve subjects was determined in this study. The subjects were all young Chinese males who performed lifting tasks in three lifting ranges (floor to knuckle, floor to shoulder, and knuckle to shoulder) and four lifting frequencies (one-time maximum, 1 lift/min, 4 lifts/min, and 6 lifts/min). The oxygen uptake (1/min) and heart rate (beats/min) were recorded while subjects were lifting. Upon completion of each lifting task, the subjects were required to rate their perceived exertion levels. The statistical analyses results indicated the following. Chinese subjects have smaller body size and MAWLs compared with past studies using the US population. The MAWLs decreased with an increase in lifting frequencies. The decrements of MAWL due to lifting frequencies were in agreement with the results of past studies. However, there were larger decreases due to lifting ranges. The MAWLs of the floor to knuckle height lift were the largest, followed by the MAWLs of the floor to shoulder height lift, and the MAWLs of the knuckle to shoulder height lift. The measured physiological responses were considered similar to those obtained in past studies. Subjects' perceived stress levels increased with the lifting frequency and the upper extremities received the most stress for the total range of lifting tasks. The comparisons of the Chinese MAWLs with the NIOSH lifting guidelines for limits (AL and MPL) indicated that the vertical discounting factor in the guidelines should be modified before the NIOSH limits can be applied to non-Western populations.

No abstract

No abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the practicality of the modified isometric strength tests to predict the maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) of Chinese men. The modified strength tests allow the participant to pull on the load cell in front of the body and to apply force in a functional free posture. Both the modified and the standard strength data of each participant were used as predictors for the MAWLs. The prediction models were constructed and evaluated under task conditions of two lifting ranges, two box sizes, and three lifting frequencies. To realize the effect of modifications, testing posture was recorded and the joint angles were calculated. A stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated that modified composite strength (MCS), chest circumference, and acromial height accounted for 86% to 91% of the variance. Because the strength of the upper extremity body was also recruited in the test, the weak upper extremity strength of the Chinese participants would therefore be better reflected. Evidence for the existence of a close match between MAWL and MCS values, as well as the task conditions for its existence, suggest that a simple isometric strength measure is a good predictor for the MAWL.

A postural analysis system was developed using a biomechanical approach to identify low back pain related working postures of nursing personnel. The Ovako Working Analysis System (OWAS) was modified for doing postural recording. Chaffin's biomechanical model was used to calculate the associated work stress on the L5/S1. The system was applied to examine the working postures of 64 nurses of 16 departments. The frequency distribution of the trunk showed 15.9% of the 8,629 observed postures were bending more than 15 degrees. Based on the calculated stress, 17.0% of the observed postures generated forces higher than the recommended action limit of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition to patient transfers, potentially health hazardous postures were identified in nursing tasks of inspection, nursing techniques, instrumentation, physical examination, taking inventory, and documentation.

No abstract