1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8141(97)00100-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the surface EMG coactivational pattern for functional evaluation of trunk muscles in subjects with and without low-back pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interesting findings were reported in a recent study examining the co-activation pattern of trunk muscles using a weight holding task for evaluation. Increased activity in external oblique and latissimus dorsi with decreased erector spinae muscle activity were found in back pain patients when compared to subjects without back pain [9]. In addition, it should take note of a previous observation that there are regional differences in the activation of external oblique during axial rotation [39].…”
Section: Emg Findingsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Interesting findings were reported in a recent study examining the co-activation pattern of trunk muscles using a weight holding task for evaluation. Increased activity in external oblique and latissimus dorsi with decreased erector spinae muscle activity were found in back pain patients when compared to subjects without back pain [9]. In addition, it should take note of a previous observation that there are regional differences in the activation of external oblique during axial rotation [39].…”
Section: Emg Findingsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…8 The finding that LBP patients demonstrated significantly increased recruitment levels of the left and right erector spinae muscles supports other studies involving subjects with LBP and different types of test movements. [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] The general finding of overactivity of superficial global muscles of the trunk, including the EO, 22 appears to be a common finding in subjects with LBP. It has been suggested that such findings might represent a functional adaptation to increase stability of the lumbar spine, 29 and thus be compensating for other muscles known to be closely associated with stability of the spine and also known to be dysfunctional in LBP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 A positive effect size indicates that LBP subjects had higher SEMG than normals, whereas a negative effect size denotes that normals had higher SEMG than LBP subjects. Ten studies 10,11,12,20,35,37,46,50,52,56 were excluded from the calculation of effect sizes as these studies did not report the necessary means and standard deviations. Data from manuscripts reporting data graphically were extrapolated.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%