No abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the treatment outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus radiotherapy (RT) alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.Methods: We retrospectively collected 601 stage II NPC patients treated in two hospitals between June 2003 to June 2016. All patients were divided into the CCRT group (n = 255) and the RT group (n = 346). Overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare the differences between the groups. The Cox-regression hazards model was performed to determine potential prognostic factors.Results: The median follow-up was 99 months. No significant difference was found in locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, disease progression, and death between the two groups (all p > 0.05). In univariate analysis, the 5-years OS, PFS, LRFFS, and DMFS had no significant differences between the CCRT and RT groups (all p > 0.05). Two-dimensional radiotherapy (2DRT) sub-analysis showed that CCRT remarkably increased DMFS, PFS, and OS rates (all p < 0.05) but not LRFFS (p = 0.258) compared with RT alone. While intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) sub-analysis showed that the prognosis of the two groups had no significant differences (all p > 0.05). In multivariate analyses, age was significantly and inversely related to OS, PFS, LRFFS, and DMFS. IMRT was an independent favorable factor for improving LRFFS, PFS, and OS. Concurrent chemotherapy was an independent protective factor for DMFS.Conclusion: In the context of 2DRT, it is definite that concurrent chemotherapy provides survival benefits for patients with stage II NPC. While in the IMRT era, the impact of chemotherapy on survival in patients with stage II NPC is weakened. Prospective randomized controlled studies are required to confirm these results.

BackgroundIn this trial, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy with nedaplatin or cisplatin in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.MethodsWe conducted an open-label, non-inferiority, phase III, randomized, controlled trial. Eligible patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive either nedaplatin or cisplatin for two cycles concurrently with radiotherapy. We reported the therapy-associated harms and survival. The study was registered with chictr.org.cn, number ChiCTR1800020527.ResultsWe randomly assigned 68 patients to nedaplatin-based or cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Study treatment was stopped early after a data analysis found a higher number of patients suffered severe hematologic harms in the nedaplatin group than in the cisplatin group. Patients in the nedaplatin group had a significantly higher frequency of grade 3-4 neutropenia (19·4% vs. 13%; P < 0·001), severe thrombocytopenia (16·1% vs. 4·3%), and grade 1-2 anemia (51·6% vs. 43·5%) than patients in the cisplatin group. The 1-year PFS and OS in the nedaplatin and cisplatin groups were similar.ConclusionOur findings showed that nedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy expressed remarkably higher severe hematologic harms which were mortal. Though the results were negative, the experiences and lessons we learned from it were important.

BackgroundOncoprotein-Induced Transcript 3 Protein (OIT3) was identified as a liver-specific gene with abnormal expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Herein, we aimed to examine the function and specific mechanism of OIT3 in HCC.MethodsBioinformatic analyses and tissue microarray via immunohistochemistry were used to validate the expression of OIT3 in HCC. The biofunctions of OIT3 in HCC were determined in vitro and in vivo. The mechanism was confirmed by RNA-Sequence and Western blotting. The uni- and multivariate analyses were used to identify the independent predictors for HCC.ResultsLow expression of OIT3 was observed in HCC and predicted a poor clinical outcome. Ectopic expression of OIT3 could inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities of HCC cells. Mechanistically, OIT3 upregulated the expression of ALOX15 and CYP4F3, thus inducing arachidonic acid increase, ROS accumulation, and lipid peroxidation, and eventually causing ferroptosis. OIT3 was validated as a prognostic predictor for HCC patients.ConclusionsOur findings revealed a novel role of OIT3 in the process of tumorigenesis of HCC. OIT3 inhibited reproliferation, migration, and invasion of HCC cells by triggering ferroptosis, which indicates that OIT3 could serve as a potential biomarker in HCC.

No abstract