HUMAN HEPATIC CYTOCHROME P450 (CYP) AND GENETIC POLYMORPHISM IN DRUG METABOLISMMany drugs undergo a hepatic biotransformation, an essential function that enhances their hydrophilicity and thus facilitates their removal from the human body. The oxidative metabolism of drugs in the liver Aliment

The clinical and electroencephalographic (EEG) effects of the individual ketamine isomers were compared with the racemic mixture in five volunteers who received each drug on a separate occasion. Racemic ketamine 275 +/- 25 mg, s(+) ketamine 140 +/- 21 mg or R(-) ketamine 429 +/- 37 mg produced an anaesthetic state lasting 6 +/- 2 min (mean +/- SD). However, the EEG evaluation of the R(-) isomer revealed less overall slowing, and an absence of the large slow wave complexes produced by the S(+) isomer and the racemic mixture. The pharmacokinetic profiles for the individual isomers of ketamine did not differ significantly from the racemic mixture. Even though the apparent anaesthetic state produced in these healthy volunteers did not differ qualitatively between the three drug groups, recovery times (assessed using a standardized battery of psychometric tests) were consistently shorter following the individual isomers compared with the racemic mixture. The serum ketamine concentrations associated with regaining consciousness and orientation were consistent with an S(+):R(-) isomer potency ratio of 4:1. In terms of their ability to impair psychomotor function, the S(+):R(-) potency ratio varied from 3:1 to 5:1. After comparable degrees of CNS depression, we conclude that the more potent S(+) isomer of ketamine was associated with a more rapid recovery of psychomotor skills than the currently used racemic mixture.

We studied the kinetic disposition and metabolism of E3810 [(+/-)-sodium 2-[[4-(3-methoxypropoxy)-3-methylpyridin-2-yl]methylsulfinyl ]-1H- benzimidazole], a new proton pump inhibitor, and omeprazole in 15 Japanese male volunteers, six of whom were poor metabolizers and nine of whom were extensive metabolizers of S-mephenytoin. All received once-daily 20 mg doses of E3810 or omeprazole for 7 days in a randomized crossover manner, with a 3-week washout period between the two trial phases. The parent drugs and their principal metabolites in plasma and urine were measured on days 1 and 7 after drug administration. The mean values for area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of omeprazole were 6.3- and 4.4-fold greater, whereas those of E3810 were 1.8- and 1.9-fold greater in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers after the first and final doses, respectively. Although the mean AUC values for both drugs were significantly (p < 0.01 or p < 0.05) greater in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers, the difference in the AUC between the two groups was smaller after E3810 than after omeprazole administration. The AUC of omeprazole tended to increase with the repeated doses in extensive metabolizers, whereas no such change was observed for E3810. The urinary excretions of the principal metabolite(s) of two proton pump inhibitors also reflected the data derived from plasma samples in relation to S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation status. We conclude that the metabolism of two proton pump inhibitors is under coregulatory control of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19), but that the magnitude of CYP2C19-mediated metabolism appears to differ between the two drugs. In contrast to omeprazole, the metabolism of E3810 is less saturable in extensive metabolizers during the repetitive dosings.

We examined genetically determined oxidation polymorphisms of metoprolol and mephenytoin in 200 unrelated, healthy Japanese subjects and in 98 mainland Chinese subjects simultaneously. This examination was done according to the respective reported phenotyping criteria by use of the urinary metabolic ratio of metoprolol and of the percentage of excretion of 4-hydroxymephenytoin 8 hours after dose administration. The frequencies of occurrence of poor metabolizers (PMs) in the Japanese versus the Chinese subjects were 0.5% versus 0% for metoprolol and 22.5% versus 17.4% for mephenytoin, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in these frequencies between the two Oriental populations. However, Chinese extensive metabolizers (EMs) showed a significantly lower excretion of alpha-hydroxymetoprolol (p less than 0.01) and 4-hydroxymephenytoin (p less than 0.001) than that of Japanese EMs, and the mode of the distribution histogram of the Chinese EMs for the two test probes was skewed compared with that of the Japanese EMs. The findings indicate that the two Far Eastern Oriental subject groups have a lower frequency of PM phenotype of debrisoquin/sparteine-type oxidation and a greater incidence of PM phenotype of mephenytoin oxidation compared with the respective frequencies reported from white subjects. However, the explanation for the observation that the metabolic capacities of the test drugs differed between the EMs of the two populations who had a similar ethnic origin and who resided in the same geographic area remains obscure.

Background: S‐mephenytoin 4’‐hydroxylase (CYP2C19) catalyses the metabolism of rabeprazole to some extent. Based on the metabolic and pharmacokinetic differences among other proton pump inhibitors such as omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole, rabeprazole appears to be the least affected proton pump inhibitor by the CYP2C19‐related genetic polymorphism. Aim: To determine whether the pharmacodynamic effects of rabeprazole on intragastric pH and serum gastrin levels, and its pharmacokinetics depend on the CYP2C19 genotype status. Methods: Eighteen healthy subjects, whose CYP2C19 genotype status was previously determined, participated in the study. They consisted of six each of homozygous extensive metabolisers (homo EMs), heterozygous extensive metabolisers (hetero EMs), and poor metabolisers (PMs). Helicobacter pylori status was determined by serology. After a single oral dose of 10 mg or 20 mg rabeprazole or water only (baseline data), intragastric pH values were monitored for 24 h. Plasma levels of rabeprazole and serum gastrin were also measured for 24 h post‐dose. Results: Five homo EM, six hetero EM and four PM subjects were H. pylori‐negative. After rabeprazole administration, significant differences in intragastric mean pH values, serum gastrin AUC0–24 and plasma levels of rabeprazole were observed among the three different genotype groups. Conclusion: The pharmacodynamic effects of rabeprazole and its pharmacokinetics depend on the CYP2C19 genotype status.

The pharmacodynamics of a racemic mixture of ketamine R,S(+/-)-ketamine and of each enantiomer, S(+)-ketamine and R(-)-ketamine, were studied in five volunteers. The median frequency of the electroencephalogram (EEG) power spectrum, a continuous noninvasive measure of the degree of central nervous system (CNS) depression (pharmacodynamics), was related to measured serum concentrations of drug (pharmacokinetics). The concentration-effect relationship was described by an inhibitory sigmoid Emax pharmacodynamic model, yielding estimates of both maximal effect (Emax) and sensitivity (IC50) to the racemic and enantiomeric forms of ketamine. R(-)-ketamine was not as effective as R,S(+/-)-ketamine or S(+)-ketamine in causing EEG slowing. The maximal decrease (mean +/- SD) of the median frequency (Emax) for R(-)-ketamine was 4.4 +/- 0.5 Hz and was significantly different from R,S(+/-)-ketamine (7.6 +/- 1.7 Hz) and S(+)-ketamine (8.3 +/- 1.9 Hz). The ketamine serum concentration that caused one-half of the maximal median frequency decrease (IC50) was 1.8 +/- 0.5 micrograms/mL for R(-)-ketamine; 2.0 +/- 0.5 micrograms/mL for R,S(+/-)-ketamine; and 0.8 +/- 0.4 microgram/mL for S(+)-ketamine. Because the maximal effect (Emax) of the R(-)-ketamine was different from that of S(+)-ketamine and R,S(+/-)-ketamine, it was not possible to directly compare the potency (i.e., IC50) of these compounds. Accordingly, a classical agonist/partial-agonist interaction model was examined, using the separate enantiomer results to predict racemate results. Although the model did not predict racemate results well, its failure was not so great as to provide clear evidence of synergism (or excess antagonism) of the enantiomers.

The results indicate that E3810 as a substrate goes less toward S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19) and has a much weaker, if any, potential to interact with diazepam compared with omeprazole.

The pharmacokinetics of ketoprofen was studied in the same healthy subjects after single oral, intramuscular and rectal doses, and after repeated oral administration. No significant difference in the mean t1/2 (1.13-1.27 h) was observed after the different modes of administration. The mean [AUC] 0 infinity after rectal administration of a suppository showed the minimum significant difference (p < 0.05) from that after oral administration of the capsule. The apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) was approximately 10-15% of body weight. The renal contribution (mean, 0.10-0.15 ml/min/kg) to the plasma clearance of free ketoprofen was assumed to be, at most, 8.3-12.9%. The projected cumulative excretion of total (free plus conjugated) ketoprofen via urine exceeded 63-75% of the dose, of which approximately 90% was ketoprofen glucuronide. A mean of 71-96% and 73-93% of the oral capsule was estimated to be systemically available after administration of the intramuscular preparation and rectal suppository, respectively. In four of seven subjects, CPK concentration was elevated after the intramuscular injection. The mean steady-state concentration of ketoprofen in plasma ranged from 0.43 to 5.62 microgram/ml after the final dose of a 50 mg q. i. d. regimen. The disposition data and plasma levels observed at steady-state were in agreement with those predicted from the single oral dose study. The accumulation ratio was 1.08 +/- 0.08. The results suggest that the rectal suppository can be recommended as an extravascular mode of administration of this drug.