Background/Aims: To determine the clinical significance of gene promoter methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we examined in clinical samples the methylation status of those promoters that showed elevated activity in hepatoma cell lines after 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine treatment. Methods: Regarding the genes with promoter hypermethylation in the cell lines, their expression levels and methylation status in HCC and non-HCC tissues were assessed by semiquantitive RT-PCR and methylation-specific PCR. To confirm the result, the expression levels and methylation status in 16 additional HCC and non-HCC tissues were assessed. Results: The promoter regions of caveolin 1 (CAV1), cysteine and glycine-rich protein 1 (CSRP1), Kruppel-like factor 6 (KLF6), myosin (light polypeptide 9) (MYL9), and transgelin (TAGLN) were highly methylated in the cell lines. CAV1 and CSRP1 were methylated in HCC more frequently than in non-HCC. KLF6, MYL9, and TAGLN were fully methylated in both HCC and non-HCC. Using additional clinical samples, downregulation of CAV1 and CSRP1 was observed in 38 and 56%, respectively, of the 16 HCC samples and aberrant methylation of CAV1 and CSRP1 was observed in 56% of HCC in both cases. Conclusion:CAV1 and CSRP1 were inactivated in HCC by aberrant methylation and they may serve as important biomarkers of malignancy.

No abstract

Pristine‐, poly(octafluorotoluene)‐ (POFT), and polyacetylene (PAc)‐coated Si wafers were used as substrates for the study of segregation of silicone diacrylate (SA) from a formulation containing other oligomeric and monomeric acrylates. POFT and PAc were microwave plasma polymerized on the Si wafers. Three SAs with molecular weights ranging from 700 to 6000 Da were synthesized and characterized. Formulations with 2 wt % SA were ultraviolet cured on the silicon wafers. The surface composition of formulation‐substrate side of the cured film was analyzed with X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and the depth profile was analyzed with time of flight‐secondary ion mass spectrometry. The analysis results indicated that SA aggregated on all three types of Si surfaces. However, SA segregation is highest on the low surface energy POFT‐coated Si substrate, and low‐molecular‐weight SA is favorable to the segregation. For high‐molecular‐weight SA, the different Si substrates do not affect the degree of aggregation at the formulation‐substrate interface. The observed SA aggregation trend can be predicted by the Gibbs‐adsorption equation correlated to the resin surface tension and contact angle on substrates. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 48: 442–450, 2010

No abstract