To investigate the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype-related differences in the progression of liver disease, 585 patients with chronic HBV infection including 258 with histologically verified chronic liver disease (CLD) and 74 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were examined. The mean ages of both patients with advanced fibrosis (F3 or F4) and with HCC were significantly older in genotype B than in genotype C patients (P ‫؍‬ .018, P ‫؍‬ .024, respectively). Both the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negativity rate at biopsy and the cumulative HBe seroconversion rate in patients with CLD were significantly higher in genotype B patients than genotype C patients (P < .01, P ‫؍‬ .022, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that genotype B, presence of precore mutation, high ALT levels, and severe histologic activity were independent factors for HBe seroconversion. Among all the biopsyproven CLD patients, the ratio of patients with advanced fibrosis in genotype B was significantly lower than that in genotype C (4/30 vs. 74/224, respectively; P ‫؍‬ .034). This difference was more remarkable in younger patients (<45 years; 1/25 vs. 47/180, respectively; P ‫؍‬ .020), and there was no difference in older patients (>45 years). The distribution of each genotype between CLD and HCC was very similar (B and C: 11.2% and 87.0% vs. 10.8% and 89.2%, respectively). In conclusion, our results suggest that, although the patients with genotype B experience earlier HBe seroconversion, slower progression of liver fibrosis, and slower development of HCC, the life-long risk of progression to advanced fibrosis and development of HCC may not differ among genotypes B-and C-related chronic liver disease. (HEPATOLOGY 2003;37:19-26.)

HCV-infected patients showed a higher prevalence of DM and IR than those with HBV infection. However, in Japan, other confounding factors appeared to be more important risk factors for the development of disturbance in glucose metabolism.

Background: Although it has been reported that different hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes induce different clinical characteristics in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD), there have been few reports that have detailed the distribution of HBV genotypes in acute forms of liver disease. Methods: HBV genotypes were determined in 61 patients who had acute forms of liver disease (45 had acute self limited hepatitis (AH) and 16 had fulminant hepatitis (FH)) and in 531 patients with CLD, including 19 patients with severe acute exacerbation of CLD. We also analysed the enhancer II, core promoter, and precore region sequences for the presence of mutations. Results: Expression of genotype B in patients with acute forms of liver disease was significantly greater than in those with CLD (39.3% v 11.7%, respectively; p,0.001). Furthermore, expression of genotype B was significantly greater in patients with FH than in those with AH (62.5% v 31.1%, respectively; p = 0.027). The precore mutation A1896 and the core promoter mutation at nt 1753 and 1754 were found more frequently in FH than in AH, and genotype B was predominant in FH regardless of the presence of these mutations. Conclusions: HBV genotype B was found more frequently in patients with acute forms of liver disease than in patients with CLD, and more frequently in patients with FH than in those with AH. These results suggest that this HBV genotype may induce more severe liver damage than other viral genotypes, at least in patients from Chiba, Japan.

Purpose: Hedgehog (Hh) signaling is activated in several cancers. However, the mechanisms of Hh signaling activation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been fully elucidated. We analyzed the involvement of Hh-interacting protein (HHIP) gene, a negative regulator of Hh signaling, in HCC. Experimental Design: Glioma-associated oncogene homologue (Gli) reporter assay, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium assay, and quantitative real-time reverse transcription^PCR for the target genes of the Hh signals were performed in HHIP stably expressing hepatoma cells. Quantitative real-time PCR for HHIP was performed in hepatoma cells and 36 HCC tissues. The methylation status of hepatoma cells and HCC tissues was also analyzed by sodium bisulfite sequencing, demethylation assay, and quantitative real-time methylation-specific PCR. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis was also performed in HCC tissues. Results: HHIP overexpression induced significant reductions of Gli reporter activity, cell viability, and transcription of the target genes of the Hh signals. HHIP was hypermethylated and transcriptionally down-regulated in a subset of hepatoma cells. Treatment with a demethylating agent led to the HHIP DNA demethylation and restoration of HHIP transcription. HHIP transcription was also down-regulated in the majority of HCC tissues, and more than half of HCC tissues exhibited HHIP hypermethylation.The HHIP transcription level in HHIP-methylated HCC tissues was significantly lower than in HHIP-unmethylated HCC tissues. More than 30% of HCC tissues showed LOH at the HHIP locus. Conclusions: The down-regulation of HHIP transcription is due to DNA hypermethylation and/ or LOH, and Hh signal activation through the inactivation of HHIP may be implicated in the pathogenesis of human HCC.

No abstract

Objective: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have been reported to induce cell growth arrest, apoptosis and differentiation in tumor cells. The effect of the HDAC inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA), on hepatoma cells, however, has not been well studied. In this study, we examined cell viability and gene expression profile in hepatoma cell lines treated with TSA. Methods: To study cell growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis by TSA on human hepatoma cell lines including HuH7, Hep3B, HepG2, and PLC/PRF/5, cells were treated with TSA at various concentrations and analyzed by the 3-(4, 5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and TUNEL assays, respectively. Changes in gene expression profile after exposure to TSA were assessed using a cDNA microarray consisting of 557 distinct cDNA of cancer-related genes. The levels of acetylated histones were examined by the chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay using anti-acetylated histone H3 or H4 antibody. Results: The MTT assay demonstrated that TSA showed cell growth inhibition not only in a concentration-dependent but also a time-dependent manner on all cell lines studied. The TUNEL assay also revealed the potential of TSA to induce apoptosis. The microarray analysis revealed that 8 genes including collagen type 1, α2 (COL1A2), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), integrin, α7 (ITGA7), basigin (BSG), quiescin Q6 (QSCN6), superoxide dismutase 3, extracellular (SOD3), nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR), and p53-induced protein (PIG11) exhibited substantial induction (ratio >2.0) after TSA treatment in multiple cell lines. ChIP assay, in general, showed a good correlation between the expression level of mRNA and levels of acetylated histones in these upregulated genes. Conclusions: This study showed cell growth inhibition and the gene expression profile in hepatoma cell lines exposed to TSA. The alteration in levels of acetylated histones was closely associated with expression of specific cancer-related genes in hepatoma cells.

No abstract

No abstract