Background Platelet indices are blood-based parameters reflecting the activation of platelets. Previous studies have identified an association between platelet indices and blood pressure (BP). However, causal inferences are prone to bias by confounding effects and reverse causation. We performed a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to compare the causal roles between genetically determined platelet indices and BP levels. Methods Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with platelet count (PLT), plateletcrit (PCT), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and BP at the level of genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10− 8) in the UK Biobank were used as instrumental variables. In bidirectional univariable MR analyses, inverse variance-weighted (IVW), MR‒Egger, and weighted median methods were used to obtain estimates for individual causal power. In addition, heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the pleiotropy of effect estimates. Finally, multivariable MR analyses were undertaken to disentangle the comparative effects of four platelet indices on BP. Results In the univariable MR analyses, increased levels of PLT and PCT were associated with higher BP, and PDW was associated with higher DBP alone. In the reverse direction, SBP had a minor influence on PLT and PCT. In multivariable MR analysis, PDW and PLT revealed an independent effect, whereas the association for PCT and MPV was insignificant after colinear correction. Conclusion These findings suggest that platelets and BP may affect each other. PDW and PLT are independent platelet indices influencing BP. Increased platelet activation and aggregation may be involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension, which may provide insights into evaluating thromboembolic events in people with high BP. The necessity of initiating antiplatelet therapy among hypertension groups needs further investigation.
Background: Platelet indices are blood-based parameters reflecting the activation of platelets. Previous studies have identified an association between platelet indices and blood pressure (BP). However, the causal inferences are prone to be biased by confounding effects and reverse causation. We performed a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to compare the causal roles between genetically determined platelet indices and BP level. Methods: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with platelet count (PLT), plateletcrit (PCT), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and BP at the level of genomewide significance (p < 5 × 10−8 ) in the UK Biobank were used as instrumental variables. In bi-directional univariable MR analyses, Inverse variance-weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, and weighted median methods were used to obtain estimates for the individual causal power. In addition, heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the pleiotropy of effect estimates. Finally, multivariable MR analyses were undertaken to disentangle the comparative effects of four platelet indices on blood pressure. Results: In the univariable MR analyses, Increased levels of PLT and PCT were associated with higher BP, and PDW was associated with higher DBP alone. In the reverse direction, SBP had a minor influence on PLT and PCT. In multivariable MR analysis, PDW and PLT revealed an independent effect, whereas the association for PCT and MPV was insignificant after co-linear correction. Conclusion: These findings suggest that platelet and BP may affect each other. PDW and PLT are independent platelet indices influencing BP. Increased platelet activation and aggregation may be involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension which may provide insights into evaluating thromboembolic events in people with high BP. The necessity of initiating antiplatelet therapy among hypertension groups need further investigation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.