Abstract. Aerosol acidity plays a key role in secondary aerosol formation. The
high-temporal-resolution PM2.5 pH and size-resolved aerosol pH in
Beijing were calculated with ISORROPIA II. In 2016–2017, the mean PM2.5
pH (at relative humidity (RH) > 30 %) over four seasons was
4.5±0.7 (winter) > 4.4±1.2 (spring) > 4.3±0.8 (autumn) > 3.8±1.2 (summer), showing
moderate acidity. In coarse-mode aerosols, Ca2+ played an important
role in aerosol pH. Under heavily polluted conditions, more secondary ions
accumulated in the coarse mode, leading to the acidity of the coarse-mode
aerosols shifting from neutral to weakly acidic. Sensitivity tests also
demonstrated the significant contribution of crustal ions to PM2.5 pH.
In the North China Plain (NCP), the common driving factors affecting
PM2.5 pH variation in all four seasons were SO42-, TNH3
(total ammonium (gas + aerosol)), and temperature, while unique factors
were Ca2+ in spring and RH in summer. The decreasing SO42-
and increasing NO3- mass fractions in PM2.5 as well as
excessive NH3 in the atmosphere in the NCP in recent years are the
reasons why aerosol acidity in China is lower than that in Europe and the
United States. The nonlinear relationship between PM2.5 pH and
TNH3 indicated that although NH3 in the NCP was abundant, the
PM2.5 pH was still acidic because of the thermodynamic equilibrium
between NH4+ and NH3. To reduce nitrate by controlling
ammonia, the amount of ammonia must be greatly reduced below excessive
quantities.
Factor analysis utilizes the covariance
of compositional variables
to separate sources of ambient pollutants like particulate matter
(PM). However, meteorology causes concentration variations in addition
to emission rate changes. Conventional positive matrix factorization
(PMF) loses information from the data because of these dilution variations.
By incorporating the ventilation coefficient, dispersion normalized
PMF (DN-PMF) reduces the dilution effects. DN-PMF was applied to hourly
speciated particulate composition data from a field campaign that
included the start of the COVID-19 outbreak. DN-PMF sharpened the
morning coal combustion and rush hour traffic peaks and lowered the
daytime soil, aged sea salt, and waste incinerator contributions that
better reflect the actual emissions. These results identified significant
changes in source contributions after the COVID-19 outbreak in China.
During this pandemic, secondary inorganic aerosol became the predominant
PM2.5 source representing 50.5% of the mean mass. Fireworks
and residential burning (32.0%), primary coal combustion emissions
(13.3%), primary traffic emissions (2.1%), soil and aged sea salt
(1.2%), and incinerator (0.9%) represent the other contributors. Traffic
decreased dramatically (70%) compared to other sources. Soil and aged
sea salt also decreased by 68%, likely from decreased traffic.
The purpose of this study is to characterize heavy metals in ambient PM 10 (particles with aerodynamic diameter below 10 µm) and PM 2.5 (particles with aerodynamic diameter below 2.5 µm) particles in a typical integrated iron and steel industry zone (HG) and a background site (ZWY) during February 2011 to January 2012 in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region, China. Twelve elements were measured to study their levels, size distribution and sources. At the two sampling sites, Fe was found as the dominated metal in the total detected metals in both particle sizes, followed by Zn and Pb. They were regarded as the marker elements of iron and steel production emission along with Cr and Mn. The concentrations of all measured heavy metals in HG were 1-3.53 times higher than those measured in ZWY. When compared with previous studies, the concentrations of steel related elements (Fe, Zn, Mn) in this work were significantly high. The highest correlation coefficient was observed in HG for Fe and Zn. Additionally, Cd was found as the most enriched heavy metal by the enrichment factor analysis, followed by Zn, Pb, and Cu. The main sources contributing to heavy metals at HG site were identified by principle component analysis: steel dust (including coal combustion of coal-fired power plant, coke making and steel making emission), vehicle emission and road re-suspension dust and soil dust. Besides, steel dust was also found as the possible source of heavy metals at ZWY site. The result suggested the steel dust has influence on the whole study area.
Eight years of data on haze and visibility (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) and one year of (2010) data on surface meteorological elements (relative humidity, wind speed, air temperature), visibility and the concentrations of air pollutants (PM 2.5 , SO 2 , NO 2 and O 3 ) measured each hour of each day were analyzed using correlation analysis to investigate the main factors influencing haze in Hangzhou, China. The occurrence of hazy weather has become more frequent over the past eight years in Hangzhou, and haze appears about 160 days per year. The occurrence of haze during the day was more frequent in the spring and the winter and less frequent in the summer and the autumn. Low visibility occurred in the morning, and the maximum visibility occurred in the afternoon period. The results of the statistical analysis show that the relative humidity and the concentration of PM 2.5 played the most important roles in reducing visibility. The correlation coefficients between the concentration of PM 2.5 and the concentrations of O 3 , SO 2 and NO 2 indicate that O 3 and NO 2 are the dominant factors contributing to PM 2.5 pollution, which, in turn, can lead to haze. To reduce the number of haze days, greater concern and more countermeasures should be taken to decrease the O 3 and NO 2 pollution in Hangzhou, China.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.