The mechanisms of plastic deformation of glassy solids and structural origin of  relaxation are two fundamental issues. We provide compelling experimental evidence that the activation of shear transformation zones ͑STZs͒ and  relaxations in metallic glasses are directly related, and the activation energy of the  relaxation and the potential-energy barriers of STZs are nearly equivalent. Our results suggest an intrinsic correlation among potential STZs,  relaxation, and the inhomogeneous atomic structure of metallic glasses, which has implications for understanding the deformation mechanism and structural origin of  relaxation in glasses.Plastic deformation of metallic glasses ͑MGs͒ far below glass transition temperature T g is a long-standing issue. [1][2][3][4] Microscopically, MGs are proposed to deform by plastic rearrangements of atomic regions involving tens of atoms termed shear transformation zones ͑STZs͒, 3,4 and a consequence of formations and self-organizations of STZs that induce macroscopical shear banding of MGs. As recognized by Johari et al., 5 the relaxation of supercooled liquids and glasses are governed by two main processes: a fast process, that is the  relaxation which is a locally initiated and reversible process, and a slow process, termed the ␣ process, which is a large-scale irreversible rearrangement of the material. The  relaxation, which is an Arrhenius process, 5-7 persists from supercooled liquid regime to glassy states, and is separated from the non-Arrhenius ␣ relaxation at a crossover temperature. 5-7 It has been proved to be an intrinsic and universal feature of glasses but poorly understood. 5,6 Usually, it is related to localized motions with cooperative nature, a reminiscent of STZs in MGs. From the theory of potential-energy landscape ͑PEL͒, 7,8 the  relaxations were identified as hopping events across subbasins within an inherent megabasin ͑inherent structure͒ while ␣ relaxations entail escape from one megabasin and eventually jump into another ͑e.g., see Fig. 1 in Ref. 8͒. Experimentally, the activation energy of the  relaxations, E  , can be determined by dielectric spectroscopy, 6 differential scanning calorimeter, 9 and by dynamic mechanical spectroscopy ͑DMS͒. 10 Since MGs are good conductors, dielectric method that commonly used in nonmetallic glasses is not feasible. The DMS, which is widely used in field of polymer glasses, 6 has been employed for studying the  relaxation in MGs. 10 Based on the PEL theory and the Frenkel's analysis of shear strengths in dislocation free solids, Johnson et al. 11 proposed a cooperative shear model ͑CSM͒ to understand the deformation mechanisms and rheological properties of MGs. 11,12 The CSM gives rise to functional relations between viscosity and shear modulus ͑e.g., see Ref. 12 for a review͒. According to the CSM, activation of isolated STZs confined within elastic matrix could be associated with the  relaxation. 13 However, the validity of this correlation, which is the fundamental conceptual standpoint of CSM, 11,13 re...