Our study is aimed at evaluating the effects of pretreatment with Poly(lactic‐co‐glycolic) acid nanoparticle loaded with resveratrol (RSV PLGA NPs) compared to conventional resveratrol (RSV) on isoproterenol (ISO) induced myocardial infarction (MI) in rats. Sixty rats were randomly divided into six groups of 10 rats each. RSV and RSV PLGA NPs were given by gavage in two different doses (50 mg/kg body weight [BW] and 100 mg/kg BW) for 3 weeks. RSV and RSV PLGA NPs were given for 2 weeks starting 1 week before ISO administration. The blood samples were taken 24 hr after the last dose of ISO. The antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and cardioprotective effects were evaluated in all groups. Only 100 mg/kg dose of RSV and both doses of RSV PLGA NPs offered a cardioprotective effect by preventing cardiac troponin T (cTnT) levels, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities leakage from cardiomyocytes, with the best result for RSV PLGA NPs. All the oxidative stress parameters were significantly improved after RSV PLGA NPs compared to RSV pretreatment. RSV PLGA NPs were more efficient than RSV in limiting the increase in inflammatory cytokine expressions such as tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α), interleukin 1 beta (IL‐1β), and NF‐kappaB (NF‐kB) expression. In addition, RSV PLGA NPs significantly upregulated eNOS expression and downregulated iNOS expression. RSV PLGA NPs better prevented myocardial necrosis and reduced interstitial edema and neutrophil infiltration than RSV, on histopathological examination. Therefore, improving the bioactivity of RSV by nanotechnology may help limit cardiac injury after myocardial infarction.
Objective: Qili Qiangxin Capsule (QQC), a Chinese patent medicine, is clinically effective in treating dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, the meta-analysis of QCC combined with conventional western medicine (CWM) on DCM remains unexplored. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of QCC in the treatment of DCM.Methods: Searched the studies of the combination of QQC and CWM in the treatment of DCM, from databases like PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wan Fang Databases, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, prior to 15 January 2022. Two reviewers respectively regulated research selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Review Manager Software 5.4 was used for meta-analysis. Furthermore, GRADE pro3.6.1 software was selected to grade the current evidence in our findings. This meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022297906).Results: There were 35 studies pertaining to 3,334 patients included. The meta-analysis showed compared with CWM alone, the combination therapy had significant advantages in improving the clinical efficiency rate (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.29, p < 0.00001), 6 min walking distance (6MWD) (MD = 41.93, 95%CI: 39.82 to 44.04, p < 0.00001), superior in ameliorating the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD = 5.73, 95%CI: 4.70 to 6.77, p < 0.00001), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (MD = −4.09, 95%CI: −4.91 to −3.27), p < 0.00001), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (MD = −4.73, 95%CI: −5.63 to −3.84), p < 0.00001) and BNP (MD = −101.09, 95%CI: -132.99 to −69.18), p < 0.00001), and also superior in reducing hypersensitive-C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) (MD = −3.78, 95%CI: −4.35 to −3.21), p < 0.00001), Interleukin- 6 (IL-6) (MD = −25.92, 95%CI: −31.35 to -20.50), p < 0.00001), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (MD = -5.04, 95%CI: −6.13 to −3.95), p < 0.00001), high mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) (MD = −4.34, 95%CI: −5.22 to −3.46), p < 0.00001), and adverse reactions (ARs) (RR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.51–0.97), p = 0.03). The GRADE evidence quality rating presented with moderate or low quality of evidence for the available data.Conclusion: Compared with the control group, QQC combined with CWM may be effective in treating DCM. However, the conclusion of this study must be interpreted carefully due to the inferior quality and ambiguity of bias in the included trials.Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier [CRD42022297906].
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.