The vestibular system is essential to produce adequate postural responses enabling voluntary movement. However, how the vestibular system influences corticospinal output during postural tasks is still unknown. Here, we examined the modulation exerted by the vestibular system on corticospinal output during standing. Healthy subjects (n = 25) maintained quiet standing, head facing forward with eyes closed. Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) was applied bipolarly and binaurally at different delays prior to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) which triggered motor evoked potentials (MEPs). With the cathode right/anode left configuration, MEPs in right Soleus (SOL) muscle were significantly suppressed when GVS was applied at ISI = 40 and 130ms before TMS. With the anode right/cathode left configuration, no significant changes were observed. Changes in the MEP amplitude were then compared to changes in the ongoing EMG when GVS was applied alone. Only the decrease in MEP amplitude at ISI = 40ms occurred without change in the ongoing EMG, suggesting that modulation occurred at a premotoneuronal level. We further investigated whether vestibular modulation could occur at the motor cortex level by assessing changes in the direct corticospinal pathways using the short-latency facilitation of the SOL Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) by TMS. None of the observed modulation occurred at the level of motor cortex. Finally, using the long-latency facilitation of the SOL H-reflex, we were able to confirm that the suppression of MEP at ISI = 40ms occurred at a premotoneuronal level. The data indicate that vestibular signals modulate corticospinal output to SOL at both premotoneuronal and motoneuronal levels during standing.

Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) has been used to assess the vestibular system, but the significant interindividual variability in the responses makes it difficult to quantitatively compare them between individuals or conditions. Using an accelerometer to quantify head movement induced by GVS, we were able to determine an objective motor threshold and construct a recruitment curve for all participants. These methods could help assess changes in the vestibular system under different conditions.

No abstract

Locomotion requires the complex involvement of the spinal and supraspinal systems. So far, the role of vestibular input in gait has been assessed mainly with respect to gait stability. The noninvasive technique of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) has been reported to decrease gait variability and increase gait speed, but the extent of its effect on spatiotemporal gait parameters is not fully known.Objective: Characterize vestibular responses during gait and determine the influence of GVS on cycle duration in healthy young participants.Methods: Fifteen right-handed individuals participated in the study. Electromyography (EMG) recordings of the bilateral soleus (SOL) and tibialis anterior muscles (TA) were performed. First, to determine stimulation intensity, an accelerometer placed on the vertex recorded the amplitude of the head tilts evoked by the GVS (1–4 mA, 200 ms) to establish a motor threshold (T). Second, while participants walked on a treadmill, GVS was applied at the onset of the stance phase during the treadmill gait with an intensity of 1 and 1.5 T with the cathode behind the right (RCathode) or left ear (LCathode). EMG traces were rectified, averaged (n = 30 stimuli), and analyzed. Latency, duration, and amplitude of vestibular responses as well as the mean duration of the gait cycles were measured.Results: GVS mainly induced long-latency responses in the right SOL, right TA and left TA. Only short-latency responses were triggered in the left SOL. Responses in the right SOL, left SOL and left TA were polarity dependent, being facilitatory with RCathode and inhibitory with LCathode, whereas responses in the right TA remained facilitatory regardless of the polarity. With the RCathode configuration, the stimulated cycle was prolonged compared with the control cycle at both 1 and 1.5 T, due to prolonged left SOL and TA EMG bursts, but no change was observed in right SOL and TA. With LCathode, GVS did not modify the cycle duration.Conclusion: During gait, a brief, low-intensity GVS pulse delivered at the right stance onset induced mainly long-latency polarity-dependent responses. Furthermore, a RCathode configuration increased the duration of the stimulated gait cycle by prolonging EMG activity on the anodic side. A similar approach could be explored to influence gait symmetry in individuals with neurological impairment.