Purpose -In most markets it is possible to identify a brand leader and a number of brand followers. The purpose of this paper is to address the following question: "Why should any consumer purchase a 'second-best' option?" Design/methodology/approach -Consideration of the way in which these two groups of consumers (brand leaders and followers) trade off product attributes (utilitarian benefits, hedonistic benefits and price fairness) during the choice process is made in the study by path analysis of the appropriate structural equation models and then a consideration of the level and the differences between the means of the three variables. Findings -The paper finds that utilitarian attributes are of paramount importance to satisfaction with the brand. This is not in accordance with conventional wisdom, which leads us to believe that price is most important to buyers of second-tier brands and hedonic considerations most important to buyers of leading brands.Research limitations/implications -The model fit attained is only good enough for exploratory work (GFI ¼ 0:88=0:90) so replication with a larger sample would be appropriate. In addition, the research is carried out in South Korea -although we know of no reason why this should affect the results it would be of interest to generalize the results to a western economy. Nevertheless, the method of first fitting the model then trading off the attribute levels is unusual and quite interesting. Practical implications -Marketers of leading brands should not concern themselves about price but merely stress the benefits, whereas marketers of follower brands should make much of the price differential. Originality/value -The importance of utilitarian benefits have hitherto not often been stressed when marketing premium brands -this research suggests that this is wrong.
This opportunistic research has been made possible by the financial crisis that struck much of Asia in 1998, and was followed by a rapid recovery in 1999. Previous research has been conducted to study the structure of family decisions in Korea during the 1997 -98 period. By adding one more set of data points, for 1999, it is possible to conduct a 3-year, longitudinal study to revisit the structure of family decision making under the impact of the economic crisis experienced during this period. The major finding is that more joint decision making occurs under economic stress, although the effect is mitigated by the economic circumstances of the respondent and involvement level of the product category. ᭧
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.