To identify molecules to serve as diagnostic markers for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and as targets for novel therapeutic drugs, we investigated genome-wide expression profiles of RCCs using a cDNA microarray. We subsequently confirmed that hypoxia-inducible protein-2 (HIG2) was expressed exclusively in RCCs and fetal kidney. Induction of HIG2 cDNA into COS7 cells led to secretion of the gene product into culture medium and resulted in enhancement of cell growth. Small interfering RNA effectively inhibited expression of HIG2 in human RCC cells that endogenously expressed high levels of the protein and significantly suppressed cell growth. Moreover, addition of polyclonal anti-HIG2 antibody into culture medium induced apoptosis in RCC-derived cell lines. By binding to an extracellular domain of frizzled homologue 10 (FZD10), HIG2 protein enhanced oncogenic Wnt signaling and its own transcription, suggesting that this product is likely to function as an autocrine growth factor. ELISA analysis of clinical samples identified secretion of HIG2 protein into the plasma of RCC patients even at an early stage of tumor development, whereas it was detected at significantly lower levels in healthy volunteers or patients with chronic glomerulonephritis. The combined evidence suggests that this molecule represents a promising candidate for development of molecular-targeting therapy and could serve as a prominent diagnostic tumor marker for patients with renal carcinomas. (Cancer Res 2005; 65(11): 4817-26)

No abstract

These results contribute to an understanding of which factor has an impact on utility scores in patients with prostate cancer.

No significant differences were observed between the drugs for the failure rate. Each treatment had a unique factor for prognosis, such as history of AUR for NAF and complications of OAB for TAM. Therefore, it will be necessary to use the two alpha(1)-blockers properly, considering the patient's background.

Two cases, sarcomatoid carcinoma and carcinosarcoma, of the urinary bladder are reported. A 68-year-old man with sarcomatoid carcinoma underwent total cystectomy and was alive and had had no recurrence after 21 months. A 78-year-old woman with carcinosarcoma underwent total cystectomy, but she died from increasing multiple lung metastases 4 months after surgery. The histopathological characteristics of both neoplasms are reported and discussed.

Aim:The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of α 1 -adrenoceptor (α 1 -AR) antagonist monotherapy with combination therapy using α 1 -AR antagonist and anticholinergic agent for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with storage symptoms as the chief complaint. Methods: In this prospective comparative study, either 25-75 mg/day of naftopidil monotherapy (monotherapy group) or combination therapy using 25-75 mg/day of naftopidil and an anticholinergic agent (10-20 mg/day of propiverine hydrochloride or 2-6 mg/day of oxybutynin hydrochloride; cotherapy group) were administered for 12 weeks to 101 BPH patients with storage symptoms. Results: International prostate symptom score (IPSS) and quality of life (QOL) index improved significantly in both groups, with no marked differences between groups. Maximum flow rate (Q max ) and residual urine volume (RUV) tended to improve in both groups, again with no marked differences between groups. However, median post-therapeutic RUV was significantly worse for the cotherapy group (45.0 mL) than for the monotherapy group (13.5 mL; P = 0.0210). Ratio of patients with increased RUV was also significantly worse for cotherapy (22.9%) than for monotherapy (5.0%; P = 0.038). Conclusions: Although the anticholinergic dosage was low, the present results suggest that naftopidil monotherapy was as useful as combination therapy of naftopidil and an anticholinergic agent. Therefore, naftopidil is a useful agent as the first choice in BPH patients with storage symptoms.

The determination of urinary CA19-9 may be a useful tumor marker of urothelial cancer, and especially in low grade cancer it may be useful in diagnosing of them because its urinary level is high and it is more sensitive than urinary cytology.

No abstract