Objective
Solving the limitations of single chemotherapy in the treatment of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods
About 100 patients with NSCLC treated in First Hospital of Jiaxing, Zhejiang from June 2016 to June 2018 were selected and randomly divided into MPC group and MGC group, with 50 cases in each group. The patients in MPC group were treated with microwave ablation (MWA) combined with PC while patients in MGC group were given MWA combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC). The therapeutic effects of the two groups as well as the complications and adverse reactions (ADRs) were observed and recorded.
Results
There was no significant difference in disease response rate (MPC group 33.3% vs MGC group 32.0%), disease control rate (MPC group 86.4% vs MGC group 78.0%) and overall survival (1‐, 2‐ and 3‐year survival, MPC group 65%, 59%, 32.7% vs MGC group 58%, 46%, 30%) between the two groups. In addition, the ADR myelosuppression was slighter in MPC group. There were 12 cases (23%) developed myelosuppression in the MPC group and 20 cases (42%) in MGC group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). The treatment was interrupted for 0 case (0%) in MPC group because of myelosuppression while 4 cases (8.3%) in MGC group.
Conclusion
The two therapeutic regimens have similar efficacy in treatment of advanced NSCLC, but MPC causes slighter myelosuppression and can be the first‐line therapy for advanced NSCLC.
The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) family determines transcription efficiency by directly binding to precursor RNAs. One member, EIF4A3, modulates the expression of circRNAs. Circular RNA SCAP (circSCAP), a newly found circRNA, has been implicated in atherosclerosis. Yet, how circSCAP regulates cancer development and progression remains understudied. Here, we investigated the function of circSCAP and the molecular mechanism in the tumorigenesis and progression of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). CircSCAP was upregulated in both NSCLC tissues and cell lines and was mainly located in the cytoplasm. CircSCAP expression was promoted by EIF4A3, which was associated with poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC. CircSCAP sponged miR-7 to upregulate small mothers against decapentaplegic 2 (SMAD2). CircSCAP knockdown undermined cell proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities in NSCLC cell lines (SPCA1 and A549), which was rescued by either inhibiting miR-7 or overexpressing SMAD2. Moreover, circSCAP knockdown upregulated E-cadherin, while downregulating N-cadherin, Vimentin, and MMP9 in SPCA1 and A549 cells, which were abolished by either inhibiting miR-7 or overexpressing SMAD2. Additionally, miR-7 was markedly downregulated, whereas SMAD2 was significantly upregulated in NSCLC tissues. MiR-7 expression was inversely correlated with circSCAP and SMAD2 expression in NSCLC tissues. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that circSCAP is significantly upregulated in NSCLC cell lines and tissues and elucidates that circSCAP facilitates NSCLC progression by sponging miR-7 and upregulating SMAD2. The study provides a novel molecular target for early diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.