The oxidative stress reaction is the imbalance between oxidation and antioxidation in the body, resulting in excessive production of oxygen free radicals in the body that cannot be removed, leading to excessive oxidation of the body, and causing damage to cells and tissues. A large number of studies have shown that oxidative stress is involved in the pathological process of many diseases, so inhibiting oxidative stress, that is, antioxidation, is of great significance for the treatment of diseases. Studies have shown that many traditional Chinese medications contain antioxidant active bioactive compounds, but the mechanisms of those compounds are different and complicated. Therefore, by summarizing the literature on antioxidant activity of traditional Chinese medication-based bioactive compounds in recent years, our review systematically elaborates the main antioxidant bioactive compounds contained in traditional Chinese medication and their mechanisms, so as to provide references for the subsequent research.

No abstract

Ventricular remodeling is related to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, immune system, and various cytokines involved in inflammation, apoptosis, and cell signal regulation. Accumulated studies have shown that traditional Chinese medicine can significantly inhibit the process of ventricular remodeling, which may be related to the mechanism mentioned above. Here, we conducted a system overview to critically review the cellular and molecular mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine on ventricular remodeling. We mainly searched PubMed for basic research about the anti-ventricular remodeling of traditional Chinese medicine in 5 recent years, and then objectively summarized these researches. We included more than 25 kinds of Chinese herbal medicines including Qi-Li-Qian-Xin, Qi-Shen-Yi-Qi Pill, Xin-Ji-Er-Kang Formula, and Yi-Qi-Wen-Yang Decoction, and found that they can inhibit ventricular remodeling effectively through multi-components and multi-action targets, which are promoting the clinical application of traditional Chinese medicine.

BackgroundAntithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is facing major treatment problems in clinical practice.MethodsWe firstly conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis to study the safety and efficacy of different antithrombotic regimens. Only randomized controlled trials from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were included in our study. The Bayesian random-effects model was used in this study. The primary safety and efficacy outcomes were major bleeding according to the criteria of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events, respectively. The secondary safety outcomes were combined TIMI major and minor bleeding, trial-defined primary bleeding events, and intracranial hemorrhage. The secondary efficacy outcomes were all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and hospitalization.ResultsTotal of 11,532 patients from the five randomized controlled trials were analyzed, of whom 8,426 were male. Compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus P2Y12 inhibitor, the odds ratios (95% credible intervals) for TIMI major bleeding were 1.70 (0.77–3.80) for VKA plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), 1.20 (0.30–4.60) for rivaroxaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 1.00 (0.25–3.90) for rivaroxaban plus DAPT, 0.76 (0.21–2.80) for dabigatran plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 0.71 (0.25–2.10) for apixaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 1.40 (0.52–3.80) for apixaban plus DAPT, and 1.00 (0.27–4.00) for edoxaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor. For trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events, compared with VKA plus P2Y12 inhibitor, the odds ratios (95% credible intervals) were 1.10 (0.61–2.00) for VKA plus DAPT, 1.20 (0.45–3.70) for rivaroxaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 1.10 (0.38–3.20) for rivaroxaban plus DAPT, 1.10 (0.43–3.10) for dabigatran plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 1.00 (0.47–2.20) for apixaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 0.99 (0.46–2.20) for apixaban plus DAPT, and 1.20 (0.43–3.40) for edoxaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor. Apixaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor was the highest-ranking of safety outcomes and VKA plus P2Y12 inhibitor was the highest-ranking of efficacy outcomes other than trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events.ConclusionApixaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor seems to be linked with fewer bleeding complications while retaining antithrombotic efficacy. Moreover, for most efficacy indicators, the ranking of VKA plus P2Y12 inhibitor is still very high.Systematic Review Registration[www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42020149894].