The PSRUC seems to improve the performance of urine cytology by limiting the AUC category to cases that are more strongly associated with HGUC.

There was a much higher risk of HGUC conveyed by AUC cytology after implementation of the PSRUC, justifying more aggressive investigations of patients who receive an AUC diagnosis. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:207-14. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

The primary extranodal B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) is a distinct clinical pathologic entity that develops in diverse anatomic locations such as the stomach, salivary gland, thyroid, lung, and breast; however, colorectal involvement is rare. To the best of our knowledge, only 30 cases of primary rectal MALT lymphoma have been published in the English language literature, mostly from Japan. A single case has been reported from the US before this report. The most common symptoms ranged from asymptomatic to occult or gross gastrointestinal bleeding. Simultaneous involvement of the cecum or colon was seen in 20% of the patients. Ninety percent of the patients were classified as low grade, Stage 1 at the time of diagnosis. Polypoid lesions were 10-fold more common than ulcerative lesions. Seven patients were reported to have H pylori in the stomach. The majority of the patients underwent surgical or endoscopic resection as a cure; however, controversy exists with regards to antibiotic treatment or observation alone because of unknown etiopathogenesis. Infection with microorganisms other than H pylori has been postulated in the development of rectal MALT lymphoma; however, this hypothesis remains unproven. The overall prognosis of rectal MALT lymphoma appears favorable; however, long-term follow-up data is lacking. Therefore, periodic clinical monitoring should be done in these patients.

Background and Study Aims: EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the standard in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions, in particular when combined with rapid on-site evaluation of cytopathology (ROSE). More recently, a fork-tip needle for core biopsy (FNB) has been shown to be associated with excellent diagnostic yield. EUS-FNB alone; however, has not been compared to EUS-FNA+ROSE in a large clinical trial. Our aim is to compare EUS-FNB alone to EUS-FNA+ROSE in solid pancreatic lesions. Patients and Methods: Multicenter non-inferiority RCT involving 7 centers. Solid pancreatic lesions referred for EUS were considered for inclusion. The primary endpoint is diagnostic accuracy. Secondary endpoints include sensitivity/specificity, mean number of needle passes, and cost. Results: 235 patients were randomized: 115 EUS-FNB alone and 120 EUS-FNA+ROSE. Overall, 217 patients had a malignant histology. The diagnostic accuracy for malignancy of EUS-FNB alone was non-inferior to EUS-FNA+ROSE 92.2% (95% CI: 86.6-96.9%) and 93.3% (95% CI: 88.8-97.9%), respectively p=0.72. Diagnostic sensitivity for malignancy was 92.5% (95% CI: 85.7-96.7%) EUS-FNB alone vs. 96.5% (93.0-98.6%) EUS-FNA+ROSE (p=0.46) while specificity was 100% in both. Adequate histology yield was obtained in 87.5% of the EUS-FNB alone samples. Mean number of needle of passes and procedure time favored EUS-FNB alone (2.3±0.6 passes vs. 3.0±1.1 passes p≤0.01 and 19.3±8.0 minutes vs. 22.7±10.8 minutes p <0.01). EUS-FNB alone cost on average 45USD more than EUS-FNA+ROSE. Conclusion: EUS-FNB alone is non-inferior to EUS-FNA+ROSE and is associated with fewer needle passes, shorter procedure time, and excellent histological yield at comparable cost. (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03435588).

No abstract