No abstract

No abstract

Background Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast has epidemiological, molecular and clinical specificities, and should likely be considered a unique entity. As for genetic susceptibility, CDH1 germline mutations predispose exclusively to ILC. Data are however scarce regarding ILC in women with BRCA1/2 (Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer) and TP53 (Li‐Fraumeni syndrome) germline mutations. Methods We included all breast cancers from female patients tested at our institute between 1992 and 2016 (n = 3469) for which pathology data were available. ILC proportion comparison according to mutational status was performed by a chi‐squared test. The impact of susceptibility genes on ILC proportion was investigated by univariate logistic regression with wild‐type patients as reference. Results and discussion There were 265 (7.64%) ILC: 2/342 (0.58%) in BRCA1 patients, 24/238 (10%) in BRCA2 patients, 1/57 (1.75%) in TP53 patients and 238/2832 (8.4%) in non‐carriers. The majority of breast cancers in all groups were invasive ductal and ductal in situ carcinomas. The difference in ILC proportion was highly significant (P < 0.001). Compared to wild‐type patients, BRCA1 was associated with a lower ILC proportion (OR 0.064 [95% CI 0.016;0.259], P < 0.0001). BRCA2 OR was 1.222 [95%CI 0.785;1.902] (P = 0.374), TP53 OR was 0.195 [95%CI 0.027;1.412] (P = 0.105). ILC are therefore underrepresented in BRCA1 and TP53 mutation carriers. Formal significance (P = 0.05) was not reached for TP53, but statistical power was only 38%. Based on ILC incidence in the general population, we make the hypothesis that BRCA1 and TP53 do not predispose to ILC, as the few occurrences of ILC in mutation carriers could be attributed to chance and not to germline mutations. Our observations will be useful to clinical cancer geneticists managing patients with ILC, as a BRCA1 or TP53 mutation in these patients would be unlikely. Genetic counseling should be adapted accordingly.

Background: MSI-H/dMMR is considered the first predictive marker of efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, around 39% of cases are refractory and additional biomarkers are needed. We explored the prognostic value of pretreatment LIPI in MSI-H/dMMR patients treated with ICIs, including identification of fast-progressors. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study of patients with metastatic MSI-H/dMMR tumors treated with ICIs between April 2014 and May 2019 was performed. LIPI was calculated based on dNLR > 3 and LDH > upper limit of normal. LIPI groups were good (zero factors), intermediate (one factor) and poor (two factors). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), including the fast-progressor rate (OS < 3 months). Results: A total of 151 patients were analyzed, mainly female (59%), with median age 64 years, performance status (PS) 0 (42%), and sporadic dMMR status (68%). ICIs were administered as first or second-line for 59%. The most frequent tumor types were gastrointestinal (66%) and gynecologic (22%). LIPI groups were good (47%), intermediate (43%), and poor (10%). The median follow-up was 32 months. One-year OS rates were 81.0%, 67.1%, and 21.4% for good, intermediate, and poor-risk groups (p <0.0001). After adjustment for tumor site, metastatic sites and PS, LIPI remained independently associated with OS (HR, poor-LIPI: 3.50, 95%CI: 1.46–8.40, p = 0.02. Overall, the fast-progressor rate was 16.0%, and 35.7% with poor-LIPI vs. 7.5% in the good-LIPI group (p = 0.02). Conclusions: LIPI identifies dMMR patients who do not benefit from ICI treatment, particularly fast-progressors. LIPI should be included as a stratification factor for future trials.

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction:Low-dose radiation therapy (LD-RT) is a therapeutic option in indolent non Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas (iNHL), usually in the palliative setting. If most iNHL are highly sensitive to radiation therapy, with good local control obtained with a dose of 4 Gy in 2 fractions, little is known about the efficacy and outcome of repetitive courses of LD-RT. We report here the results of a study cohort of repetitive LD-RT in iNHL. Methods : We retrospectively reviewed the records of all iNHL patients treated by two or more courses of LD-RT at Gustave Roussy, between January 1990 and December 2015. Patients received LD-RT as palliative treatment for low-bulky disease, patient's comfort or painful adenopathy. Clinical data, histological types, outcome and treatment lines were collected. Overall survival was the time between lymphoma diagnosis and death from any cause. Last LD-RT follow-up period was the time between the last LD-RT session and latest news. Results: Thirty-five pts were analyzed. Among them, 24 pts (69%) had Follicular Lymphoma (FL), 6 pts (17%) Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL), 3 pts (9%) had B-cell primitive Cutaneous Lymphoma Follicular Type (CL-FL) and 2 pts (6%) Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma (NLPHL). At lymphoma diagnosis, median age was 57 years [range 20-80]. Ann Arbor stage was I-II in 18 pts (51%), and III-IV in 17 pts (49%). Patients received a median of 4 therapeutics lines (range 2-11), and 2 LD-RT courses (range 2-6). Median overall survival was 146 months [29-298 months]. Four patients had died: 2 of disease progression and 2 others from concomitant illness (1 cardiac disease and 1 hepatocellular carcinoma). No patient had experienced transformation to diffuse large B cell lymphoma after RT-LD treatments. In the vast majority of cases (31/35; 89%), the LD-RT were successively performed to lymphoma relapse outside irradiation fields. Exclusive repetitive courses of LD-RT without chemotherapy were received by 8/35 (23%) of patients; while 24/35 (69%) patients received repetitive LD-RT alternately with immunotherapies or chemotherapies; and 3/35 (9%) others repetitive LD-RT alternately with standard dose RT. After the second course of LD-RT, 12/35 (34%) patients were managed in watch and wait approach, 6/35 (17%) received another LD-RT and 17/35 (49%) patients had experienced a progressive disease and were treated with immunotherapy or chemotherapy or standard dose radiotherapy. The LD-RT was the last treatment modality in 18/35 (51%) patients with histological types distributed in FL (n=10), MZL (n=5) and CT-FL (n=3). With a median last LD-RT follow up of 32 months [7-177 months], 23/35 (66%) patients remained in complete remission, 9/35 patients (26%) had experienced progressive disease and 3/35 (9%) patients had obtained stable disease. Conclusion: As palliative treatment modality, the repetitive low dose radiation therapy 4 Gy in two fractions could provide alternative option treatment in iNHL. This study support further investigations of this simple, well tolerated and not costly therapy in iNHL, especially in the context of new immunotherapeutic agent's area. Disclosures Michot: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ribrag:ArgenX: Research Funding; Esai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmamar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NanoString: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

No abstract