No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Inspired from occurrence of anti-inflammatory activity of 3-substituted coumarins and antiulcer activity of various 2-substituted benzimidazoles, novel compounds have been designed by coupling coumarin derivatives at 3-position directly or through amide linkage with benzimidazole nucleus at 2-position. The resultant compounds are expected to exhibit both anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities along with less gastric toxicity profile. Two series of coumarin–benzimidazole derivatives (4a–e and 5a–e) were synthesized and evaluated for anti-inflammatory activity and antioxidant activity. Compounds 4c, 4d and 5a displayed good anti-inflammatory (45.45%, 46.75% and 42.85% inhibition, respectively, versus 54.54% inhibition by indomethacin) and antioxidant (IC50 of 19.7, 13.9 and 1.2 µmol/L, respectively, versus 23.4 µmol/L for butylatedhydroxytoluene) activities. Evaluation of ulcer index and in vivo biochemical estimations for oxidative stress revealed that compounds 4d and 5a remain safe on gastric mucosa and did not induce oxidative stress in tissues. Calculation of various molecular properties suggests the compounds to be sufficiently bioavailable.

Coumarin enjoys an important place in drug discovery process due to its presence in diversity of biologically active compounds. Many compounds of plant origin are derivatives of coumarin. Taking these natural products as lead, research groups across the globe have designed and synthesized numerous coumarin analogues for treatment of varied diseases. Cancer is one of the dreadful chronic diseases, and many drugs are available for its treatment. However, due to heterogeneity of cancer, the search is still on to develop drugs for specific types of cancers. The present review is an attempt to study various coumarin derivatives of natural as well as synthetic origins, which are identified or developed for the treatment of different types of cancers. Herein, we have classified various anticancer coumarin derivatives on the basis of their origin as well as substitution around it. These are discussed under the headings of natural, semi-synthetic and synthetic coumarin derivatives. The synthetic coumarin derivatives are further classified as mono-, di- and poly-substituted and fused coumarin derivatives. Of the six positions available for substituents on coumarin nucleus, only three positions (C-3, C-4 and C-7) are exploited for the selection of functional groups appropriate for anticancer activity. The other positions (C-5, C-6 and C-8) are either unexplored or very less exploited. The present review is expected to provide the medicinal chemists a guide to choose new functional groups for substitution at different positions of coumarin nucleus for development of novel compounds for the treatment of a specific type of cancer.

Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which is expressed in response to bacterial/proinflammatory stimuli, generates nitric oxide (NO) that provides cytoprotection. Overexpression of iNOS increases the levels of NO, and this increased NO level is implicated in pathophysiology of complex multifactorial diseases like Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease. Selective inhibition of iNOS is an effective approach in treatment of such complex diseases. L-Arginine, being a substrate for iNOS, is the natural lead to develop iNOS inhibitors. More than 200 research reports on development of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors by different research groups across the globe have appeared in literature so far. The first review on iNOS, in 2002, discussed the iNOS inhibitors under two classes that is, amino acid and non-amino acid derivatives. Other review articles discussing specific chemical classes of iNOS inhibitors also appeared during last decade. In the present review, all reports on both natural and synthetic iNOS inhibitors, published 2002 onwards, are studied, classified, and discussed to provide comprehensive information on iNOS inhibitors. The synthetic inhibitors are broadly classified into two categories that is, arginine and non-arginine analogs. The latter are further classified into amidines, five-or six-membered heterocyclics, fused cyclics, steroidal type, and chalcones analogs. Structures of the most/significantly potent compounds from each report are provided to know the functional groups important for incurring iNOS inhibitory activity and selectivity. This review is aimed to provide a comprehensive view to the medicinal chemists for rational designing of novel and potent iNOS inhibitors. K E Y W O R D S arginine, inflammation, inhibitors, multifactorial disease, nitric oxide 1 | INTRODUCTION Nitric oxide (NO) is a relaxing factor derived from endothelium, which is responsible for neuronal transmission, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, respiratory, antipathogenic, and antitumor responses. The production of NO is effected by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) through catalysis of NADPH-dependent oxidation of L-arginine (the substrate). 1NOS exists in three distinct isoforms, depending on the site of its existence that is, neuronal NOS (nNOS, type I), inducible or inflammatory NOS (iNOS, type II) and endothelial NOS (eNOS, type III). Constitutive NOS are regulated by the binding of calcium-calmodulin protein, whereas iNOS is transcriptionally regulated and calcium-calmodulin independent. NO plays both physiological and pathological roles depending on the magnitude and duration of its production. 2 The physiological roles of NO are executed by soluble guanylate cyclase. Indeed, NO activates it, with the consequent increase of cyclic guanosine-3′,5′-monophosphate (cGMP) level, which subsequently activates intracellular effector molecules, cGMPdependent protein kinases, cGMP-gated ion channels, and cGMP-regulated phosphodiesteras...