Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are being increasingly employed as a part of multimodal non-opioid strategies to treat postoperative pain. In the present study, we sought to review the effects of short-term NSAID use on musculoskeletal softtissue healing. Methods: We performed a scoping review of all studies that included the use of NSAIDs and their effect on healing of soft tissues, which for the purpose of this review refers to non-osseous musculoskeletal tissue such as ligament, tendon, labrum, and meniscus. The inclusion criteria encompassed all studies (human, animal, and in vitro) that evaluated the effect of NSAIDs on soft-tissue healing. Subgroup analyses, wherever applicable, were conducted on the basis of the type of NSAID (cyclooxygenase [COX]-specific or nonspecific) and the type of study (human, animal, or in vitro). Relevant metadata from each study were abstracted, and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. Results: A total of 44 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 3 human studies, 33 animal studies, and 8 in vitro studies. These studies included 4 different NSAIDs in the human subgroup, 16 different NSAIDs in the animal subgroup, and 7 different NSAIDs in the in vitro subgroup. The majority of reported studies (including 1 of 2 human studies, 10 of 14 animal studies, and 3 of 3 in vitro studies) demonstrated that COX-2-selective inhibitors had negative impact on soft-tissue healing. In contrast, the majority of human and animal studies (2 of 2 and 19 of 30, respectively) demonstrated that nonselective COX inhibitors had no negative effect on the healing of labrum, tendons, and ligaments. The majority of in vitro studies demonstrated that NSAIDs have a harmful effect on biological processes involved in tendon-healing and regeneration (tenocyte proliferation, collagen and glycosaminoglycan synthesis). Conclusions: Current limited evidence demonstrates that selective COX-2 inhibitors can negatively affect healing of musculoskeletal soft tissue after surgical repair. In contrast, the majority of studies demonstrate that nonselective COX inhibitors have no negative effect on musculoskeletal soft-tissue healing. Additional highquality human clinical trials are necessary to provide more definitive conclusions.

Scaffold material is essential in providing mechanical support to tissue, allowing stem cells to improve their function in the healing and repair of trauma sites and tissue regeneration. The scaffold aids cell organization in the damaged tissue. It serves and allows bio mimicking the mechanical and biological properties of the target tissue and facilitates cell proliferation and differentiation at the regeneration site. In this study, the developed and assayed bio-composite made of unique collagen fibers and alginate hydrogel supports the function of cells around the implanted material. We used an in vivo rat model to study the scaffold effects when transplanted subcutaneously and as an augment for tendon repair. Animals’ well-being was measured by their weight and daily activity post scaffold transplantation during their recovery. At the end of the experiment, the bio-composite was histologically examined, and the surrounding tissues around the implant were evaluated for inflammation reaction and scarring tissue. In the histology, the formation of granulation tissue and fibroblasts that were part of the inclusion process of the implanted material were noted. At the transplanted sites, inflammatory cells, such as plasma cells, macrophages, and giant cells, were also observed as expected at this time point post transplantation. This study demonstrated not only the collagen-alginate device biocompatibility, with no cytotoxic effects on the analyzed rats, but also that the 3D structure enables cell migration and new blood vessel formation needed for tissue repair. Overall, the results of the current study proved for the first time that the implantable scaffold for long-term confirms the well-being of these rats and is correspondence to biocompatibility ISO standards and can be further developed for medical devices application.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Aims Rotator cuff (RC) tears are common musculoskeletal injuries which often require surgical intervention. Noninvasive pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) devices have been approved for treatment of long-bone fracture nonunions and as an adjunct to lumbar and cervical spine fusion surgery. This study aimed to assess the effect of continuous PEMF on postoperative RC healing in a rat RC repair model. Methods A total of 30 Wistar rats underwent acute bilateral supraspinatus tear and repair. A miniaturized electromagnetic device (MED) was implanted at the right shoulder and generated focused PEMF therapy. The animals’ left shoulders served as controls. Biomechanical, histological, and bone properties were assessed at three and six weeks. Results Extension of the tendon from preload to the maximum load to failure was significantly better in the PEMF-treated shoulders at three weeks compared to controls (p = 0.038). The percentage strain was significantly higher in the PEMF group at both timepoints (p = 0.037). Collagen organization was significantly better (p = 0.034) as was tissue mineral density in the PEMF-treated group at three weeks (p = 0.028). Tendon immunohistochemistry revealed a prominent increase in type I collagen at the repair site at three weeks following continuous PEMF treatment compared with controls. None of the other tested parameters differed between the groups. Conclusion MED-generated PEMF may enhance early postoperative tendon-to-bone healing in an acute rat supraspinatus detachment and repair model. Superior biomechanical elasticity parameters together with better collagen organization suggest improved RC healing. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(5):298–306.

Glenohumeral arthritis has become increasingly prevalent. For patients with glenohumeral arthritis and an intact rotator cuff, an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been shown to provide substantial pain relief with consistent, reproducible results. The primary indication is intractable pain that has not responded to nonoperative treatment, resulting in a substantial negative impact on the quality of life of the patient. Other indications for anatomic TSA include posttraumatic glenohumeral arthritis, inflammatory arthritis, and humeral head osteonecrosis. Contraindications include active infection, deltoid insufficiency, severe glenoid bone deficiency, and excessive glenohumeral posterior subluxation or laxity that cannot be surgically corrected. In order to provide the stability necessary to withstand the forces that impact the glenoid, the implant used in TSA should replicate the native anatomy of the individual patient by using a combination of implant modularity with different humeral neck angles and glenoid version augments, as well as dual eccentricity of the neck and head implant. The major steps in TSA include (1) preoperative planning, (2) patient positioning and setup, (3) surgical exposure, (4) accessing the glenohumeral joint, (5) preparation of the humerus, (6) exposure and preparation of the glenoid with component insertion, (7) humeral component insertion and trial reduction, (8) subscapularis reattachment and closure, and (9) postoperative immobilization and rehabilitation. The expected outcomes of TSA include improved quality of life (as indicated by improved outcome and patient satisfaction scores), shoulder active range of motion, and strength. In a large study examining outcomes of TSA in patients >55 years old, Patel et al. 1 reported improved American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (48.3 ± 23.0), Constant (33.1 ± 16.7), and University of California Los Angeles (16.7 ± 6.3) shoulder scores, as well as improved active range of motion in active abduction (42° ± 41°), forward flexion (46° ± 40°), external rotation (33° ± 23°), and internal rotation (2.2° ± 1.8°) and decreased visual analog scale scores (−5.1 ± 2.9). Another study 2 showed increased maximal weight improvement of 7.7 ± 4.0 lbs (3.5 ± 1.8 kg).