PURPOSE: We investigated the adaptability and acceptance of a novel spectacle lens design that was recently reported to achieve a significant antimyopia effect.DESIGN: A prospective, cross-over study. METHODS: Twenty children were recruited to wear both Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) and single vision (SV) lens, with a random assignment of which type of lens was experienced first. For each type of lens, high and low contrast central distant visual acuity (VA) and high contrast mid-peripheral near VA were measured at both 500 lux and 50 lux ambient illuminance after 30 minutes' and a week's wearing of the lens. A self-developed questionnaire was applied to evaluate the visual discomfort at the 1-week visit. All quantitative data were analyzed by paired t test, while qualitative data were analyzed with the x 2 or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.RESULTS: Central VA was not affected by DIMS lens compared with SV lens in all circumstances (all P > .05). However, the mid-peripheral near VA was found to reduce by approximately 0.06 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution unit in 2 of 4 quadrants (500 lux; P < .05) and in 3 quadrants (50 lux; P < .05) for DIMS lenses. No improvement was detected in the 1-week visit. Midperipheral blurred vision was the main visual complaint, which was noticed only once or twice a day. Being aware of the average antimyopic efficacy, 90% of children subjects preferred DIMS lenses. CONCLUSION: Mid-peripheral vision through DIMS lenses was slightly affected compared with SV lenses. Otherwise, DIMS lenses received good tolerance and acceptance by Chinese children. (Am J Ophthalmol 2020;211: 207-216. Ó 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).) Supplemental Material available at AJO.com.
PurposeTo compare light intensity and near-visual tasks objectively between rural and urban children.MethodsClouclip, a wearable device, was applied to assess metrics of these two factors in 78 fifth-grade students from an urban and from a rural school.ResultsThe light intensity experienced by urban students was found significantly lower both in the school period (614.05 ± 178.77 vs. 918.41 ± 257.81 lux, P < 0.001) and on the weekend (444.53 ± 216.65 vs. 882.21 ± 536.67 lux, P < 0.001). The duration of exposure to bright light (>1000 lux) was also substantially shorter for urban students. Although no significant difference was found in near work–related behaviors during the school period and the weekend, for the after-school period the urban students had a shorter average viewing distance (30.94 ± 4.14 vs. 34.81 ± 3.93 cm, P < 0.001), a longer accumulated duration of near work (2.25 ± 0.53 vs. 1.95 ± 0.46 hours, P = 0.010), a greater time ratio of near work (56% ± 14% vs. 49% ± 14%, P = 0.045), and a greater time ratio of excessively close near work (49% ± 13% vs. 40% ± 12%, P = 0.001).ConclusionsOur data indicate there were substantial differences in light exposure and near-work metrics between the two regions. The correlation between these differences and the discrepancy in regional myopia prevalence needs further investigation.Translational RelevanceThe objective quantification of these metrics might help explain the varied myopia prevalence among regions.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the two-dimensional peripheral refraction in fellow eyes of patients with isomyopia and anisomyopia. METHODS. Sixty-eight young adults were recruited, including 25 isomyopes with interocular differences (IODs) of foveal refraction < 1.00 D and 43 anisomyopes with IOD > 1.50 D. Peripheral refraction across an area of the visual field of 60°× 36°with a resolution of 1°was measured using a custom-made Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor. The retinal area was divided into 3 × 3 zones for comparison between the fellow eyes. RESULTS. There was no difference of refraction in all corresponding zones between the fellow eyes in the isomyopic group (all P > 0.05). The IODs between more myopic (MM) eyes and less myopic (LM) eyes in the anisomyopic group ranged from −1.40 to approximately −2.46 D (all P <0.001), which was flagged in the center and attenuated in peripheral zones by varied magnitudes. In the stratification analysis for different levels of anisomyopia, the nasal retina first presented significant relative hyperopic shifts compared to the center, followed by the temporal retina. In contrast, the superior and inferior periphery only differed from the center when the central IOD was greater than 3.00 D. CONCLUSIONS. The two-dimensional peripheral refraction patterns showed a mirror symmetry between the fellow eyes of a patient with isomyopia. However, in the anisomyopic group, peripheral refraction showed significantly relative hyperopic shift when compared with the center and developed with a varied rate in different areas. These findings may indicate an asymmetrical variation in the peripheral refraction patterns during myopia progression.
Purpose: To provide a comprehensive investigation of the optical quality across the visual field for current mainstream types of refractive surgeries. Methods: Sixty eyes from 60 adults who received refractive surgery of either femtosecond laser–assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), Q-value guided customized laser in situ keratomileusis (Q-LASIK), small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), or Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) (STAAR Surgical) implantation were included in this study. Refraction and optical aberrations from a visual field of horizontal 60° (from temporal 30° to nasal 30°) and vertical 36° (from superior 20° to inferior 16°) were measured using a custom-made Hartmann-Shack wavefront peripheral sensor. Refractive error, higher order aberrations, point spread function (PSF), and Strehl ratio were compared among these groups prior to and after the surgical procedures, respectively. Results: All types of surgical procedures achieved an almost plano refraction in the central retina. This was also the case in the peripheral retina for the three types of laser refractive surgeries. However, residual peripheral relative hyperopic defocus was observed after ICL implantation. In all groups prior to the surgery, PSFs showed increasing distortion with eccentricity and arrow-like shape pointing toward the central fovea in the periphery in diagonals. Degradation of the PSFs was diminished by all three types of laser refractive surgeries, whereas ICL implantation made the peripheral distortion more prominent. Conclusions: Although ICL implantation produced a similar impact on refractive correction and objective optical quality in the central vision compared with other laser refractive surgeries, its outcome on the peripheral optics is different. The impact of this difference on visual performance deserves notice and warrants further investigation. [ J Refract Surg . 2023;39(1):40–47.]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.