No abstract

Visual comparison is a key process in everyday learning and reasoning. Recent research has discovered the spatial alignment principle, based on the broader framework of structure‐mapping theory in comparison. According to the spatial alignment principle, visual comparison is more efficient when the figures being compared are arranged in direct placement—that is, juxtaposed with parallel structural axes. In this placement, (1) the intended relational correspondences are readily apparent, and (2) the influence of potential competing correspondences is minimized. There is evidence for the spatial alignment principle in adults’ visual comparison (Matlen et al., 2020). Here, we test whether it holds for children. Six‐ and eight‐year‐old children performed a same‐different task over visual pairs. The results indicated that direct placement led to faster and more accurate comparison, both for concrete same‐different matches (matches of both objects and relations) and for purely relational matches—evidence that the same structural alignment process holds for visual comparison in 6‐ and 8‐year‐olds as in adults. These findings have implications for learning and education.

No abstract

The ongoing stream of sensory experience is so complex and ever‐changing that we tend to parse this experience at “event boundaries,” which structures and strengthens memory. Memory processes undergo profound change across early childhood. Whether young children also divide their ongoing processing along event boundaries, and if those boundaries relate to memory, could provide important insight into the development of memory systems. In Study 1, 4–7‐year‐old children and adults segmented a cartoon, and we tested their memory. Children's event boundaries were more variable than adults’ and differed in location and consistency of agreement. Older children's event segmentation was more adult‐like than younger children's, and children who segmented events more like adults had better memory for those events. In Study 2, we asked whether these developmental differences in event segmentation had their roots in distinct neural representations. A separate group of 4–8‐year‐old children watched the same cartoon while undergoing an fMRI scan. In the right hippocampus, greater pattern dissimilarity across event boundaries compared to within events was evident for both child and adult behavioral boundaries, suggesting children and adults share similar event cognition. However, the boundaries identified by a data‐driven Hidden Markov Model found that a different brain region—the left and right angular gyrus—aligned only with event boundaries defined by children. Overall, these data suggest that children's event cognition is reasonably well‐developed by age 4 but continues to become more adult‐like across early childhood.RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Adults naturally break their experience into events, which structures and strengthens memory, but less is known about children's event perception and memory. Study 1 had adults and children segment and remember events from an animated show, and Study 2 compared those segmentations to other children's fMRI data. Children show better recognition and temporal order memory and more adult‐like event segmentation with age, and children who segment more like adults have better memory. Children's and adults’ behavioral boundaries mapped onto pattern similarity differences in hippocampus, and children's behavioral boundaries matched a data‐driven model's boundaries in angular gyrus.