ObjectiveTo analyze the efficacy of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib for pancreatic cancer, and to determine the predictive role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS mutations in these patients.MethodsThis was a single-center, randomized, open-label, prospective trial. Eighty-eight chemotherapy-naïve metastatic pancreatic cancer patients were randomized for treatment with gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus erlotinib. EGFR and KRAS mutations were analyzed, respectively. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate.ResultsDisease control rate (64% vs. 25%; P < 0.001), progression-free survival (median 3.8 vs. 2.4 months; P < 0.001), and overall survival (median 7.2 vs. 4.4 months; P < 0.001) were better in the gemcitabine plus erlotinib group than in the gemcitabine alone group. In the gemcitabine plus erlotinib group, disease control (85% vs. 33%; P = 0.001), progression-free survival (median 5.9 vs. 2.4 months; P = 0.004), and overall survival (median 8.7 vs. 6.0 months; P = 0.044) were better in patients with EGFR mutations than in those without EGFR mutations. KRAS mutation was not associated with treatment response or survival.ConclusionsGemcitabine plus erlotinib is more effective than gemcitabine alone for treating metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, especially those with EGFR mutations. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01608841.

Aim: To investigate the expression of three components of the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway (SHH, SMO and GLI1) in human colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and evaluate their association with clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients. Methods: Fresh tumor tissues and matched tissues adjacent to the tumor were collected from 43 CRC patients undergoing surgery. Normal colorectal tissues from 20 non-CRC cases were also sampled as normal controls. The expression of SHH, SMO, GLI1 mRNAs was assessed by RT-PCR and proteins were detected by immunohistochemical staining. Associations with clinicopathological characteristics of patients were analyzed. Results: SHH mRNA was expressed more frequently in tumor tissues than in normal tissues, but the difference did not reach significance in comparison to that in the adjacent tissues. SMO and GLI1 mRNAs were expressed more frequently in tumor tissues than in both adjacent andnormal tissues. The expression intensities of SHH, SMO, GLI1 mRNA in tumor tissues were significantly higher than those in adjacent tissues and normal tissues. Proteins were also detected more frequently in tumors than other tissues. No significant links were apparent with gender, age, location, degree of infiltration or Dukes stage. Conclusion: Positive rates and intensities of mRNA and protein expression of Hh signaling pathway related genes SHH, SMO, GLI1 were found to be significantly increased in CRC tissues. However, over-expression did not appear to be associated with particular clinicopathological characteristics.

UGT1A polymorphisms and renal failure may lead to accumulation of SN-38, which may have played a role in the death of this patient. Irinotecan should be used cautiously in dialysis patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and screening for UGT1A polymorphisms may help in identifying patients with lower SN-38 glucuronidation rates and greater susceptibility to irinotecan-induced toxicity.

The present study aimed to elucidate the genetic features of multiple lung cancer (MLC) and identify effective molecular markers for diagnosis using next generation sequencing (NGS). The present data may also inform patient treatment and prognosis. A total of 35 lesions were obtained from 17 patients with MLC. Based on lesion histology and NGS, 13 cases of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) were identified and 4 cases were classified as intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM). All 4 patients with IPM exhibited an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and synchronous mutation of at least one tumor suppressor gene. The frequency and percentage of EGFR mutations, accompanied with tumor suppressor genes, were significantly higher in patients with IPM compared with MPLC. Furthermore, a high EGFR-heterogeneity score and male sex were risk factors of IPM occurrence. There were significant differences in mean EGFR mutation abundance alone, mutations of tumor suppressor genes and mutations of EGFR combined with tumor suppressor genes between patients with adenocarcinoma (ADC) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). In conclusion, histological characteristics combined with genetic alterations may be an effective method for the diagnosis of MPLC and IPM, and NGS may serve as a useful diagnostic tool. MLC exhibited unique molecular characteristics, including higher rates of EGFR mutations, EGFR driver mutations accompanied with tumor suppressor gene mutations and the absence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations, which may help distinguish between patients with MPLC or IPM. The present study hypothesized that the mean frequency of EGFR mutations, mutations of tumor suppressor genes and mutations of both EGFR and tumor suppressor genes may serve an important role in the development of AIS to ADC. The results of the present study highlight the potential underlying mechanisms of lung ADC development, which may assist with future elucidation of effective treatments to prevent the progression of lung cancer.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract