Five weekly intra-articular injections of Artz provide pain relief and functional improvements in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grades I and II ankle OA. The clinical effect was rapid at 1 week and may last for 6 months or more.
Significant improvement in pain, physical function and balance tests was demonstrated after five weekly Artzal injections in geriatric patients with knee OA. The effect had rapid onset at 1 week and may last for 6 months.
BackgroundThere was an increasing requirement for novel treatments of osteoarthritis (OA). The aim was to compare the efficacy of intraarticular Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) and intraarticular hyaluronate plus rehabilitation exercise in patients with ankle OA.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded study with a 6-month follow-up period, conducted in the outpatient rehabilitation department at a university-affiliated tertiary care medical center. Seventy-five patients with symptomatic ankle OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2) were randomized to receive either a single 100-unit BoNT-A injection into the target ankle (n = 38) or a single hyaluronate injection plus 12 sessions of rehabilitation exercise (30 minutes/day, 3 times/week for 4 weeks) (n = 37). The primary outcome measure was the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS). Secondary outcome measures included American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle/Hindfoot Score, visual analog scale (VAS) for ankle pain, single leg stance test (SLS), Timed “Up-and-Go” test (TUG), consumption of rescue analgesics and global patient satisfaction.ResultsThere were no significant between-group differences in total AOS scores, pain subscale and disability subscale scores (adjusted mean difference AMD = -0.2, 95% CI = (-0.5, 0.2), p = 0.39; AMD = -0.1, 95% CI = (-0.5, 0.3), p = 0.57; AMD = -0.2, 95% CI = (-0.6, 0.2), p = 0.36). The 2 groups showed no significant differences in AOFAS, VAS, SLS, TUG scores and consumption of rescue analgesics at each follow-up visit, except that the hyaluronate group improved more in SLS than the BoNT-A group at 1-month follow-up. Patients’ satisfaction rate was high, with no serious adverse events. There was no difference in adverse events between the two groups (p = 1.00).ConclusionsTreatment with intraarticular BoNT-A or hyaluronate injection plus rehabilitation exercise was associated with improvements in pain, physical function and balance in patients with ankle OA. These effects were rapid at 2 weeks and might last for at least 6 months. There was no difference in effectiveness between the two interventions.Trial registrationThe trial was registered at clinical trials.gov (Registry number NCT01760577).
This study suggests that three weekly injections of hyaluronate are well-tolerated and can provide pain relief and improve function and balance in patients with unilateral ankle arthritis. Larger controlled trials with longer follow-up are necessary to verify the effects of hyaluronate in the treatment of ankle arthritis.
Viscosupplementation refers to the concept of synovial fluid replacement with intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) for the relief of pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA). Intra-articular viscosupplementation was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1997. It is currently indicated only for the treatment of pain associated with knee OA. However, OA can occur in several of the weight-bearing joints of the foot and ankle. Ankle OA produces chronic disability that directly impacts the quality of life. There is only limited published literature relating to the use of HA in the ankle. This paper will review the authors’ experience, indications, clinical outcomes, and complications of viscosupplementation therapy in patients with ankle OA.
The finding of muscle edema restricted to a single muscle compartment on MRI usually indicates a diagnosis of traumatic injury, myositis, denervation or neoplasm. This case demonstrates that deep venous thrombosis can also be the cause of isolated deep posterior compartment muscle edema in the calf and should be considered in the differential diagnosis even in the absence of diffuse soft tissue or subcutaneous edema.
Object. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of coralline hydroxyapatite (CHA) and laminectomy-derived bone as an adjuvant graft material when combined with autogenous iliac bone graft (AIBG) in posterolateral fusion (PLF).Methods. This prospective, case—control study involved 58 patients who underwent lumbar instrumentation-augmented PLF for degenerative spinal stenosis—induced segmental instability between July 2000 and June 2001. The patients were divided into three groups. Laminectomy bone and AIBG were placed in the right intertransverse process space in Group 1 (20 patients), CHA and AIBG were placed in Group 2 (19 patients), and laminectomy bone and CHA were placed in Group 3 (19 patients). Pure autogenous iliac cancellous bone graft was placed in the left intertransverse process space in all three groups of patients. Successful fusion was determined by two spine surgeons after examining the plain, anteroposterior, bilateral oblique, and lateral flexion—extension radiographs. If the examiners did not agree on fusion status, fine-cut computerized tomography scans of the fusion mass were used to make the final decision. The chi-square test was used to compare the fusion rate at different time intervals among the three groups.Conclusions. Pure AIBG placed in left intertransverse process space was associated with the best fusion rate. After 6 months, CHA produced a comparable result to laminectomy-derived bone when combined with AIBG. When laminectomy bone was mixed with CHA, the combination failed to yield a satisfactory fusion rate (57.9%) even 1 year after surgery if no AIBG was added.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.