Compression therapy for burn scars can accelerate scar maturation and improve clinical symptoms (pruritus and pain). This study objectively verified the effect of pressure garment therapy in maintaining a therapeutic pressure range for hypertrophic scars. Sixty-five participants (aged 20~70 years) with partial- or full-thickness burns, Vancouver scar scale score of ≥4, and a hypertrophic scar of ≥4 cm × 4 cm were enrolled. Compression pressure was measured weekly using a portable pressure-monitoring device to regulate this pressure at 15~25 mmHg for 2 months. In the control group, the compression garment use duration and all other burn rehabilitation measures were identical except for compression monitoring. No significant difference was noted in the initial evaluations between the two groups (p > 0.05). The improvements in the amount of change in scar thickness (p = 0.03), erythema (p = 0.03), and sebum (p = 0.02) were significantly more in the pressure monitoring group than in the control group. No significant differences were noted in melanin levels, trans-epidermal water loss, or changes measured using the Cutometer® between the two groups. The efficacy of compression garment therapy for burn-related hypertrophic scars can be improved using a pressure-monitoring device to maintain the therapeutic range.
Background Telehealth is a promising alternative to primary care delivery in provider shortage areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of the 4Ms (i.e., Medication, Mentation, Mobility, What Matters) framework in telehealth-based primary care in provider shortage areas by ethnic status. Methods This study was a retrospective analysis of 184 older adults (60+) representing 5% of the total sample at urban primary care in ethnically and racially diverse populations. Data were retrieved from July 2020 to September 2021. 14 trained primary care providers participated in this study and provided the 4Ms as following: 1) Medication (e.g., deprescribe or reduce high-risk Medication); 2) Mentation (e.g., depression and cognition assessment with brief counseling); 3) Mobility (e.g., mobility and home safety assessments); 4) What matters (e.g., advance care planning). The current study measured components of the 4Ms per telehealth visit by ethnic/race status (white vs. non-white). Results Overall, advance care planning (i.e., what matters) was the most discussed via telehealth (79%), followed by mobility (46.2%), Medication (16.8%), and Mentation (14.7%). To examine the disproportion of accessing telehealth by patients’ racial background, the independence test of chi-square showed that non-white populations were less likely to have access to telehealth than white patients (p = .02). Conclusion There was an ethnic and racial disparity in the 4M framework application via telehealth in an urban primary care clinic. To sustain telehealth for patients in a healthcare shortage, ethnically and culturally specific training is needed, and linguistically diverse curricula are recommended.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.