Preoperative chemoradiation with oral capecitabine appears to be safe and well tolerated, and at least as good as continuous 5-FU.
Testing significantly affected adjuvant treatment in T3 MMR-P stage II colon cancer in clinical practice. The study is limited by its design, which compared treatment recommendations pretesting to actual treatments received post-testing, lack of a control group, and nonassessment of confounding factors that may have affected treatment decisions.
Background Anatomic location of primary tumors across the colon correlate with survival in the metastatic setting, whereas left‐sided tumors may exhibit superior survival compared with right‐sided tumors. The Oncotype Recurrence Score (RS) assay is a clinically validated predictor of recurrence risk in patients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC). Previous studies had indicated that without adjuvant chemotherapy, CDX2‐negative stage II CRC tumors are associated with a lower rate of disease‐free survival than CDX2‐positive stage II CRC tumors. We aimed to evaluate whether these two validated prognostic biomarkers may correlate with primary tumor location, and whether tumor location may reflect differential prognosis in stage II CRC. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with T3 mismatch repair‐proficient (MMR‐P) stage II CRC for whom RS assay was performed. Pathological report was reviewed for exact primary tumor location and CDX2 immunostaining. RS and CDX2 expression were correlated with primary tumor location. Results The analysis included 1,147 patients with MMR‐P stage II CRC (median age 69 years [range 29–93]). Tumor distribution across the colon was as follows: 46% (n = 551) were right‐sided and 54% (n = 596) were left‐sided. RS was higher in right‐sided tumors (p = .01). The RS results gradually decreased across the colon (cecum, highest score; sigmoid, lowest score; p = .04). Right‐sided tumors exhibited more CDX2‐negative tumors (p = .07). Conclusion Our study indicates that right‐sided colorectal tumors may display worse prognosis compared with left‐sided tumors in MMR‐P stage II CRC. Primary tumor location may serve as a prognostic factor that should be taken into account for recurrence risk assessment and consideration of adjuvant treatment. Implications for Practice Sidedness matters, even in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC). Using two previously established prognostic tools, the Oncotype DX assay and CDX2 expression, this study found that right‐sided tumors may display worse prognosis compared with left‐sided tumors in mismatch repair‐proficient stage II CRC. Therefore, primary tumor location should be taken into account for recurrence risk assessment and consideration of adjuvant treatment.
523 Background: Recent evidence indicate that the anatomic location of primary tumors across the colon correlate with survival in the metastatic setting, whereas left-sided tumors may exhibit superior survival compared with right-sided. The Oncotype DX, a 12-gene colon cancer assay, is a clinically validated predictor of recurrence risk in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Previous studies had indicated that CDX2-negative colorectal tumors are often associated with several adverse prognostic variables. Recently, it has been shown that without adjuvant chemotherapy, CDX2-negative stage II CRC tumors were associated with a lower rate of disease-free survival than CDX2-positive stage II CRC tumors. We aimed to evaluate whether these validated two prognostic biomarkers may correlate with primary tumor location, and whether tumor location may reflect differential prognosis in stage II CRC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with T3 mismatch repair proficient (MMR-P) stage II CRC for whom 12-gene assay was performed (between 1/2011-2/2016). Pathological report was reviewed for exact primary tumor location and CDX2 immunostaining. Recurrence score (RS) and CDX2 expression were correlated with primary tumor location. Results: The analysis included 1087 patients with MMR-P stage II CRC (median age 69 years (range 29-93)). Tumor distribution across the colon was as follows: 46% (n = 500) were right-sided (cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon) and 54% (n = 587) were left-sided (splenic flexure, descending colon, sigmoid colon and rectum). Recurrence score was higher in right-sided tumors compared with left-sided tumors (p = 0.01). The RS gradually decreased across the colon (cecum - highest score, sigmoid-lowest score, p = 0.04). Right-sided tumors exhibited more CDX2-negative tumors compared with left-sided tumors (p = 0.07). Conclusions: Our study indicate that right-sided colorectal tumors may display worse prognosis compared with left-sided tumors in MMR-P stage II CRC. Primary tumor location may serve as a prognostic factor that should be accounted for recurrence risk assessment and consideration of adjuvant treatment.
A prospective pilot study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of uterine artery blood flow in the detection of various pathologic endometrial conditions in 39 asymptomatic postmenopausal breast cancer patients who were treated with tamoxifen. No specific pattern was seen for the uterine artery pulsatility index values in the tamoxifen‐treated patients that could be related to any specific endometrial lesions, nor were any specific changes observed in the pulsatility index value with increasing severity of the pathologic endometrial conditions. Similarly, no correlation was found between ultrasonographically measured endometrial widths and uterine artery pulsatility index values. Thus, although pulsed Doppler flow ultrasonography has been shown previously to be effective in the detection of uterine cancer in non‐tamoxifen‐treated post‐menopausal patients, it probably does not contribute to the assessment of endometrial lesions in post‐menopausal breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.