2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the 12-Gene Colon Cancer Assay on Clinical Decision Making for Adjuvant Therapy in Stage II Colon Cancer Patients

Abstract: Testing significantly affected adjuvant treatment in T3 MMR-P stage II colon cancer in clinical practice. The study is limited by its design, which compared treatment recommendations pretesting to actual treatments received post-testing, lack of a control group, and nonassessment of confounding factors that may have affected treatment decisions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pre-assay, 121 (45%) patients received recommendation for chemotherapy; post-assay, 75 (28%) actually received chemotherapy. Changes in treatment intensity were generally consistent with the Recurrence Score results with increased treatment intensity observed more often at higher scores and decreased intensity at lower scores [24]. Consistent with prior results, in this first international study of the role of the 12-gene assay in clinical decision making, the use of the 12-gene assay had an impact on treatment decisions in Israel, with an overall net reduction in chemotherapy use.…”
Section: Impact Of the 12-gene Colon Cancer Assay On Clinical Decisiosupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pre-assay, 121 (45%) patients received recommendation for chemotherapy; post-assay, 75 (28%) actually received chemotherapy. Changes in treatment intensity were generally consistent with the Recurrence Score results with increased treatment intensity observed more often at higher scores and decreased intensity at lower scores [24]. Consistent with prior results, in this first international study of the role of the 12-gene assay in clinical decision making, the use of the 12-gene assay had an impact on treatment decisions in Israel, with an overall net reduction in chemotherapy use.…”
Section: Impact Of the 12-gene Colon Cancer Assay On Clinical Decisiosupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The impact of the 12-gene colon cancer assay results on stage II colon cancer in clinical practice was evaluated after the first two years of use in a survey of medical oncologists [22]. Subsequently, two prospective studies examined the impact of the assay on clinical decision making at multiple centers within the Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium network [23], and in patients from the Clalit Health Services in Israel [24].…”
Section: Impact Of the 12-gene Colon Cancer Assay On Clinical Decisiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a new diagnostic test for determining the likelihood of recurrence in stage II colon cancer patients after surgical resection, Onco-typeDX colon cancer assay has been commercially available worldwide since 2010 Webber et al, 2010). Specially, the effectiveness of the Oncotype DX colon cancer assay has been validated in a prospective multicenter study for the prediction of recurrence risk in stage II colon cancer patients (Brenner et al, 2016;Srivastava et al, 2014). Yothers et al (2013) also found that incorporating the Onco-typeDX colon cancer assay might better inform adjuvant therapy decisions in stage II and III colon cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular traits are already at the foundations of the currently proposed high-risk criteria are inaccurate (20). Much energy has been put into gene panels that would yield better prognostic and predictive tools for risk assessment (21)(22)(23), but the results are thus far disappointing, with no panels having reached widespread incorporation in clinical practice. The same goes for most other proposed prognostic systems (9,19,(24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%