Purpose Scattered radiation is a major cause of image quality degradation in flat panel detector‐based cone beam CT (CBCT). While recently introduced 2D antiscatter grids reject the majority of scatter fluence, the small percentage of scatter fluence still transmitted to the detector remains a major challenge for implementation of quantitative imaging techniques such as dual energy imaging in CBCT. Additionally, this residual scatter is also a major source of grid‐induced artifacts, which impedes implementation of 2D grids in CBCT. We therefore present a new method to achieve both robust scatter rejection and residual scatter correction using a 2D antiscatter grid; in doing so, we expand the role of 2D grids from mere scatter rejection devices to scatter measurement devices. Method In our method, the radiopaque septa of the 2D grid emulate a micro array of beam‐stops placed on the detector which introduce spatially periodic septal shadows. By selecting sufficiently thin grid septa, the primary intensity can be reduced while preserving the uniformity of scatter intensity. This enables us to correlate the modulated pixel signal intensity in septal shadows with local scatter intensity. Our method then exploits this correlation to measure and remove residual scatter intensity from projections. No assumptions are made about the object being imaged. We refer to this as Grid‐based Scatter Sampling (GSS). In this work, we evaluate the principle of signal modulation with grid septa, the accuracy of scatter estimates, and the effect of the GSS method on image quality using simulations and measurements. We also implement the GSS method experimentally using a 2D grid prototype. Results Our results demonstrate that the GSS method increased CT number accuracy and reduced image artifacts associated with scatter. With 2D grid and residual scatter correction, HU nonuniformity was reduced from 65 HU to 30 HU in pelvis sized phantoms, and HU variations due to change in phantom size were reduced from 59 HU to 20 HU, when compared to use of only a 2D grid. With residual scatter correction via GSS method, grid‐induced ring artifacts were suppressed, leading to a 41% reduction in noise. The shape of the modulation transfer function (MTF) was preserved before and after suppression of ring artifacts. Conclusions Our grid‐based scatter sampling method enables utilization of a 2D grid as a scatter measurement and correction device. This method significantly improves quantitative accuracy in CBCT, further reducing the image quality gap between CBCT and multi‐detector CT. By correcting residual scatter with the proposed method, grid‐induced line artifacts in projections and associated ring artifacts in CBCT images were also suppressed with no compromise of spatial resolution.

While two-dimensional antiscatter grids (2D grid) reduce scatter intensity substantially in Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), a small fraction of scattered radiation is transmitted through the 2D grid to the detector. Residual scatter limits the accuracy of CT numbers and interferes with the correction of grid's septal shadows, or footprint, in projections. If grid's septal shadows are not adequately suppressed in projections, it will lead to ring artifacts in CBCT images. In this work, we present a new method to correct residual scatter transmitted through the grid by employing the 2D grid itself as a residual scatter measurement device.

We have been investigating two-dimensional (2D) antiscatter grids (2D ASGs) to reduce scatter fluence and improve image quality in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). In this work, two different aspects of 2D ASGs, their scatter rejection and correction capability, were investigated in CBCT experiments. To correct residual scatter transmitted through the 2D ASG, it was used as a scatter measurement device with a novel method: grid-based scatter sampling. Methods: Three focused 2D ASG prototypes with grid ratios of 8, 12, and 16 were developed for linac-mounted offset detector CBCT geometry. In the first phase, 2D ASGs were used as a scatter rejection device, and the effect of grid ratio on CT number accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) evaluated in CBCT images. In the second phase, a grid-based scatter sampling method which exploits the signal modulation characteristics of the 2D ASG's septal shadows to measure and correct residual scatter transmitted through the grid was implemented. To evaluate CT number accuracy, the percent change in CT numbers was measured by changing the phantom from head to pelvis size and configuration. Results: When 2D ASG was used as a scatter rejection device, CT number accuracy increased and the CT number variation due to change in phantom dimensions was reduced from 23% to 2-6%. A grid ratio of 16 yielded the lowest CT number variation. All three 2D ASGs yielded improvement in CNR, up to a factor of two in pelvis-sized phantoms. When 2D ASG prototypes were used for both scatter rejection and correction, CT number variations were reduced further, to 1.3-2.6%. In comparisons with a clinical CBCT system and a high-performance radiographic ASG, 2D ASG provided higher CT number accuracy under the same imaging conditions. Conclusions: When 2D ASG is used solely as a scatter rejection device, substantial improvement in CT number accuracy can be achieved by increasing the grid ratio. Two-dimensional ASGs also provided significant CNR improvement even at lower grid ratios. Two-dimensional ASGs used in conjunction with the grid-based scatter sampling method provided further improvement in CT number accuracy, irrespective of the grid ratio, while preserving 2D ASGs' capacity to improve CNR. The combined effect of scatter rejection and residual scatter correction by 2D ASG may accelerate implementation of new techniques in CBCT that require high quantitative accuracy, such as radiotherapy dose calculation and dual energy CBCT.