2021
DOI: 10.1002/mp.14756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of scatter rejection and correction performance of 2D antiscatter grids in cone beam computed tomography

Abstract: We have been investigating two-dimensional (2D) antiscatter grids (2D ASGs) to reduce scatter fluence and improve image quality in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). In this work, two different aspects of 2D ASGs, their scatter rejection and correction capability, were investigated in CBCT experiments. To correct residual scatter transmitted through the 2D ASG, it was used as a scatter measurement device with a novel method: grid-based scatter sampling. Methods: Three focused 2D ASG prototypes with grid rat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(130 reference statements)
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the extension to covering a large area of the x‐ray detector is not straightforward due to design, fabrication, and implementation considerations 67 . 2D‐ASGs have been previously manufactured in tungsten, due to its higher attenuation coefficient 24,35,36 . However, our results show that large‐area 2D‐ASGs manufactured in cobalt–chromium alloy are able to significantly improve image quality for high‐scatter scenarios at relatively low diagnostic energies (i.e., 80 kVp).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the extension to covering a large area of the x‐ray detector is not straightforward due to design, fabrication, and implementation considerations 67 . 2D‐ASGs have been previously manufactured in tungsten, due to its higher attenuation coefficient 24,35,36 . However, our results show that large‐area 2D‐ASGs manufactured in cobalt–chromium alloy are able to significantly improve image quality for high‐scatter scenarios at relatively low diagnostic energies (i.e., 80 kVp).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…These residual stresses compound as the part occupies a larger area of the build plate. To the best of our knowledge, the largest 2D‐ASG prototypes described in the literature have not exceeded an area of 3 × 20 cm 2 of the build plate 24,33,35–37,67 . Additionally, the assembling of multiple prototypes into a larger grid presents challenges such as alignment of the assembly and thicker septa at the interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the acquisition of CBCT scans utilizes a large-area detector, deterioration in CBCT image quality due to beam scattering is inevitable. However, although this study included improvement in low-dose CBCT image quality via the proposed method, measurement-based scatter correction such as an anti-scatter grid ( 45 ) or beam blocker ( 19 , 46 ) was not applied to the acquired CBCT projection data. Considering that scatter correction methods can be used to acquire CBCT projection data, further reductions in the SNU of low-dose CBCT image quality can be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Physics-based methods suppress scatter by adding additional hardware to the system, such as anti-scatter grids. [5][6][7] They can prevent or decrease scattered Xrays reaching the detector and therefore reduce the scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR). However, these methods will increase the radiation dose to patients to compensate for the loss of signal-to-noise ratio caused by the absorption of primary photons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, many studies have aimed to address the CBCT scatter problem, which can be broadly categorized into physics‐based and algorithm‐based methods 4 . Physics‐based methods suppress scatter by adding additional hardware to the system, such as anti‐scatter grids 5–7 . They can prevent or decrease scattered X‐rays reaching the detector and therefore reduce the scatter‐to‐primary ratio (SPR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%