Background/Aims: The effects of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the risk of death for patients with malignant disease are uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine the association between the presence of CKD and mortality in cancer patients. Method: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 8,223 cancer patients with one or more serum creatinine measurements from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2004. The key outcome was cancer-specific mortality within the follow-up period. The cumulative incidence rate for death from cancer was estimated using methods of competing risks survival analysis. Cox proportional-hazards regression with the use of Fine and Gray’s proportional-hazards model were evaluated in multiple analyses. Results: CKD was associated with an increased risk of death in cancer patients. The adjusted hazard ratios were 1.12 for patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 30–59 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95% confidence interval 1.01–1.26, p = 0.04) and 1.75 for patients with an eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95% confidence interval 1.32–2.32, p < 0.001). Conclusions: CKD should be considered a risk factor for survival among patients with cancer.
Background: Although numerous chemotherapeutic agents have been tested, the role of systemic chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been clarified. New therapeutic strategies are thus needed to improve outcomes, and we designed this study with new effective drug combination.
Although this study had a small sample size and limited statistical power, CPT-11 monotherapy and mFOLFIRI appear to be equally active and tolerable as second-line chemotherapy for AGC. The addition of 5-FU/LV to CPT-11 did not significantly improve efficacy.
The aim of this study was to compare human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) status in primary colorectal cancer and paired liver or lung metastasis. Gene amplification of HER2 has been intensively evaluated in contemporary oncology, especially in breast and stomach cancer. The knowledge of HER2 status in primary and metastatic sites may be of potential value for therapeutic decision making in metastatic colon cancer. The HER2 status was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 94 colorectal cancer with corresponding liver or lung metastases. HER2 amplification was present in 19 of the 188 (10.1%) of both primary and metastases combined. Four (4.6%) patients showed HER2 amplification in the metastasis and 10 (10.6%) patients showed HER2 amplification in the primary tumor. In 14 cases (14.8%), the HER2 status of the primary lesions was different from that of the associated metastases. The presence of HER2 overexpression in KRAS mutant colon cancer was found in 5.3%. No relationship was found between HER2 expression and KRAS status (P = 0.486). The evidence of HER2 positive metastatic lesion and primary colorectal cancer suggest that HER2 assessment might be considered in selected cases when this may help change the therapeutic decision.
Most appendiceal tumors presented with appendicitis and periappendiceal abscess. Appendiceal tumors should be included in the differential diagnosis when an unexpected appendiceal mass is encountered during appendectomy.
During cancer resection surgeries, intraoperative histopathologic examination of the surgical specimen is crucial for tumor margin identification. A conventional frozen‐section analysis requires complex tissue processing, which prolongs surgery and potentially introduces interpretation errors. Here, as a novel approach to label‐free intraoperative histopathology, a high‐speed reflection‐mode ultraviolet photoacoustic microscopy (UV‐PAM) system employing a waterproof 1‐axis microelectromechanical systems scanner is demonstrated. Label‐free nuclear imaging is photoacoustically verified using tissue sections excised from mice and humans. Moreover, by imaging clinical specimens from cancer patients and numerically quantifying the histopathologic results, it is successfully demonstrated that the proposed UV‐PAM system has great potential as an alternative intraoperative histopathology method with minimal tissue preparation processes.
BackgroundMost patients with distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma have developed jaundice or cholangitis at the time of initial diagnosis, which can delay surgery. We aim to evaluate the actual EB-RFA ablation volume and validated the clinical feasibility of preoperative endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (EB-RFA) for resectable distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.MethodsThe medical records of patients who underwent EB-RFA from July 2016 to June 2017 at a single tertiary academic medical center were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients with resectable distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who required preoperative biliary decompression. Clinical outcomes of EB-RFA were reviewed retrospectively and the surgical specimens were reevaluated.ResultsOf the eight patients who required a delayed operation, preoperative EB-RFA was successfully performed without serious complications including peritonitis, hemobilia, or perforation. Although curative resection was attempted in all patients, one patient underwent open and closure due to hepatic metastasis. Seven patients underwent curative surgical resection and the histology revealed that median maximal ablation depth was 4.0 mm (range, 1–6) and median effective ablation length (histological ablation length/fluorosocopic ablation length) was 72.0% (range, 42.1–95.3).ConclusionsEB-RFA partially ablated human cancer tissue and preoperative EB-RFA might be a safe and feasible in patients with distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who require a delayed operation. Ablation of the target lesion longer than the estimated length by fluoroscopy may improve the efficacy of EB-RFA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.