When it comes to the human brain, models that closely mimic in vivo conditions are lacking. Living neuronal tissue is the closest representation of the in vivo human brain outside of a living person. Here, we present a method that can be used to maintain therapeutically resected healthy neuronal tissue for prolonged periods without any discernible changes in tissue vitality, evidenced by immunohistochemistry, genetic expression, and electrophysiology. This method was then used to assess glioblastoma (GBM) progression in its natural environment by microinjection of patient-derived tumor cells into cultured sections. The result closely resembles the pattern of de novo tumor growth and invasion, drug therapy response, and cytokine environment. Reactive transformation of astrocytes, as an example of the cellular nonmalignant tumor environment, can be accurately simulated with transcriptional differences similar to those of astrocytes isolated from acute GBM specimens. In a nutshell, we present a simple method to study GBM in its physiological environment, from which valuable insights can be gained. This technique can lead to further advancements in neuroscience, neuro-oncology, and pharmacotherapy.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Objective: To compare the radiation exposure with the scrub nurse, assistant surgeon, and anesthetist during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using conventional 2-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy or 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation.Summary of Background Data: Minimally invasive spinal fusion techniques are related to higher radiation exposures compared with open techniques. Especially the routinely exposed surgical staff faces the risks of increased radiation exposure.Methods: In total, 41 patients with planned monosegmental minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion were randomized into the intraoperative imaging techniques 2D fluoroscopy or 3D navigation. Eye lens and film dosemeters were attached to defined locations of the scrub nurse, assistant surgeon, and anesthetist. Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon-matched pairs signed-rank test were used to compare dosemeter readings. This study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00004514). Results:The radiation exposure per surgery was low for the scrub nurse, assistant surgeon, and anesthetist in both the 2D fluoroscopy and 3D navigation groups. The maximum average value of 0.057 ± 0.031 mSv was measured on the unprotected chest of the assistant surgeon and was thus slightly above the lower detection limit of the dosemeters (0.044 mSv). The annual occupational dose limit would be exceeded at the earliest after 571 operations for the unprotected eye lens of the assistant surgeon.Conclusions: Minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery is possible with comparatively low radiation exposure to the assisting operating room personnel without exceeding the annual maximum occupational radiation exposure. However, there is no definite dose value below which ionizing radiation poses no risk. Consequently, radiation sparing work routines should be strictly followed.

OBJECTIVEIntraoperative 3D imaging and navigation is increasingly used for minimally invasive spine surgery. A novel, noninvasive patient tracker that is adhered as a mask on the skin for 3D navigation necessitates a larger intraoperative 3D image set for appropriate referencing. This enlarged 3D image data set can be acquired by a state-of-the-art 3D C-arm device that is equipped with a large flat-panel detector. However, the presumably associated higher radiation exposure to the patient has essentially not yet been investigated and is therefore the objective of this study.METHODSPatients were retrospectively included if a thoracolumbar 3D scan was performed intraoperatively between 2016 and 2019 using a 3D C-arm with a large 30 × 30–cm flat-panel detector (3D scan volume 4096 cm3) or a 3D C-arm with a smaller 20 × 20–cm flat-panel detector (3D scan volume 2097 cm3), and the dose area product was available for the 3D scan. Additionally, the fluoroscopy time and the number of fluoroscopic images per 3D scan, as well as the BMI of the patients, were recorded.RESULTSThe authors compared 62 intraoperative thoracolumbar 3D scans using the 3D C-arm with a large flat-panel detector and 12 3D scans using the 3D C-arm with a small flat-panel detector. Overall, the 3D C-arm with a large flat-panel detector required more fluoroscopic images per scan (mean 389.0 ± 8.4 vs 117.0 ± 4.6, p < 0.0001), leading to a significantly higher dose area product (mean 1028.6 ± 767.9 vs 457.1 ± 118.9 cGy × cm2, p = 0.0044).CONCLUSIONSThe novel, noninvasive patient tracker mask facilitates intraoperative 3D navigation while eliminating the need for an additional skin incision with detachment of the autochthonous muscles. However, the use of this patient tracker mask requires a larger intraoperative 3D image data set for accurate registration, resulting in a 2.25 times higher radiation exposure to the patient. The use of the patient tracker mask should thus be based on an individual decision, especially taking into considering the radiation exposure and extent of instrumentation.

Study Design. Randomized controlled trial. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the dosemetrically determined radiation exposure of surgeon and patient during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) using conventional 2D fluoroscopy (FLUORO) or 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation (NAV). Summary of Background Data. MIS TLIF was shown to exhibit higher radiation exposures compared to open techniques. In particular, the routinely exposed surgeon encounters the risks of increased radiation doses. With the additional use of intraoperative 3D navigation, major steps of the operation can be performed without exposing the operating room staff to ionizing radiation. Methods. Forty-four patients undergoing monosegmental MIS TLIF were randomized into the two intraoperative imaging technique groups (FLUORO or NAV). The primary endpoint was the radiation exposure of the surgeon; the secondary endpoints were the radiation exposure of the patient and C-arm readings. Results. After exclusion of three patients, 41 patients were analyzed. In general, the average radiation exposure of the surgeon was lower in the NAV group without being statistically significant. The radiation exposure of the patient was significantly higher in the NAV group at all dosemeter sites. The average fluoroscopy time was 63 ± 36 versus 109 ± 31 sec (FLUORO versus NAV group, P < 0.001). Conclusion. The additional use of intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation compared to conventional 2D fluoroscopy alone showed a nonsignificant reduction of the radiation exposure of the surgeon in monosegmental MIS TLIF, while increasing the radiation exposure of the patient. Level of Evidence: 1

BACKGROUND Neuropathic dental pain (NDP) is a chronic pain condition that is notoriously difficult to treat. To date, there are no deep brain stimulation (DBS) studies on this specific pain condition and no optimal target or “sweet spot” has ever been defined. OBJECTIVE To determine the optimal thalamic target for improving this condition by utilizing the steering abilities of a directional DBS electrode (Vercise CartesiaTM Model DB-2202-45, Boston Scientific) METHODS A literature search and review of our database identified 3 potential thalamic targets. A directional lead was implanted in a patient with NDP and its current steering used to test the effects in each nucleus. The patient reported her pain after 2 wk of stimulation in a prospective randomized blinded trial of one. Quality of life measurements were performed before and after 3 mo on their best setting. RESULTS We identified 3 potential nuclei: the centromedian (CM), ventral posterior medial (VPM), and anterior pulvinar. The best results were during VPM stimulation (&gt;90% reduction in pain) and CM stimulation (50% reduction). Following 3 mo of VPM-DBS in combination of lateral CM stimulation, their pain disability index dropped (from 25 to 0) and short form 36 improved (from 67.5 to 90). CONCLUSION VPM stimulation in combination with CM stimulation is a promising target for NDP. DBS electrode directionality can be used to test multiple targets and select a patient specific “sweet spot” for NDP treatment.