Breeding programs for purple wheat are underway in many countries but there is a lack of information on the effects of Pp (purple pericarp) genes on agronomic and quality traits in variable environments and along the product chain (grain-flour-bread). This study was based on unique material: two pairs of isogenic lines in a spring wheat cv. Saratovskaya-29 (S29) background differing only in Pp genes and grain color. In 2017, seven experiments were conducted in Kazakhstan, Russia, and Turkey with a focus on genotype and environment interaction and, in 2018, one experiment in Turkey with a focus on grain, flour, and bread quality. The effect of environment was greater compared to genotype for the productivity and quality traits studied. Nevertheless, several important traits, such as grain color and anthocyanin content, are closely controlled by genotype, offering the opportunity for selection. Phenolic content in purple-grained lines was not significantly higher in whole wheat flour than in red-colored lines. However, this trait was significantly higher in bread. For antioxidant activities, no differences between the genotypes were detected in both experiments. Comparison of two sources of Pp genes demonstrated that the lines originating from cv. Purple Feed had substantially improved productivity and quality traits compared to those from cv. Purple.
Background and objectives
The gluten strength of soft wheat breeding materials can be categorized according to various quality tests. While weak gluten in flours is typically required for the production of soft‐dough biscuits, extensible dough with medium gluten strength is required from flours suitable for the production of other types of biscuits. Genotypes that have high gluten strength are ordinarily eliminated from soft wheat breeding programs. Therefore, small‐scale quality test methods that can predict the gluten strength of genotypes, especially in the early stages of breeding, are highly desirable. In the present study, the effectiveness and efficiency of a small‐scale lactic acid solvent retention capacity (LASRC) test, as a potential simplified means to evaluate gluten strength for soft wheat breeding programs, were investigated.
Findings
Soft wheat genotypes grown in different locations were categorized by the LASRC values of their flours. GlutoPeak, Mixolab, farinograph, mixograph, Zeleny sedimentation, and glutenin swelling index test results were also used for comparison, in order to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of LASRC. LASRC test results successfully discriminated between soft‐/weak‐ and hard‐/strong‐dough groups, but were sometimes less successful in discriminating between hard‐/strong‐ and medium‐strong‐dough groups. Mixograph development time and area, farinograph stability and degree of softening, Mixolab stability, GlutoPeak AM value, and Zeleny sedimentation parameters all showed strong correlations with LASRC.
Conclusions
This study confirmed that new a small‐scale LASRC has potential as a simplified, rapid, and effective small‐sample test.
Significance and novelty
This LASRC small‐sample flour test can be recommended for predicting gluten strength, especially for early‐generation selection of soft wheat breeding materials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.