With the rapid growth and development of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) technology there has been an increasing demand for clean and sustainable global energy applications.While there are many device-level and infrastructure challenges still to be overcome before wide commercialization can be realized, increasing the PEMFC power density is a critical technical challenge, with ambitious goals proposed globally. For example, the short-term and long-term goals of the Japan New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) are 6 kW L -1 by 2030 and 9 kW L -1 by 2040, respectively. To this end, we propose technical development directions required for next-generation high power density PEMFCs. This perspective comprehensively embraces the latest advanced ideas for improvements in the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) and its components, bipolar plate (BP), integrated BP-MEA design, with regard to water and thermal management, and materials. The realization of these ideas is expected to be encompassed in next-generation PEMFCs with the aim of achieving a high power density.

Garnet‐type solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs) have been widely studied as a promising candidate for Li metal batteries. Despite the common belief that inorganic SSEs can prevent dendrite propagation, garnet SSEs suffer from relatively low critical current density (CCD) at which the SSEs are abruptly short‐circuited by Li dendrites. In this study, the short‐circuiting mechanism of garnet Li7La2.75Ca0.25Zr1.75Nb0.25O12 (LLCZN) is investigated. It is found that instead of propagating uniaxially from one electrode to other in a dendritic form, metallic lithium is formed within the SSE. This can be attributed to the fact that electrons combine with Li ions at the grain boundary, which exhibits relatively high electronic conductivity, and then reduce Li+ to Li0 to cause short circuits. In order to reduce the electronic conductivity at the grain boundary, a thin layer of LiAlO2 is coated on the grain surface of LLCZN, which results in an improved CCD value. It is also found that under higher external voltages, the electronic conductivity of SSE becomes more significant, which is believed to be the origin of CCD. These findings not only shed light on the short‐circuiting mechanism of garnet‐type SSEs but also offer a novel perspective and useful guidance on their designs and modifications.

The lithium–sulfur (Li–S) battery is considered a promising candidate for the next generation of energy storage system due to its high specific energy density and low cost of raw materials. However, the practical application of Li–S batteries is severely limited by several weaknesses such as the shuttle effect of polysulfides and the insulation of the electrochemical products of sulfur and Li2S/Li2S2. Here, by doping nitrogen and integrating highly dispersed cobalt catalysts, a porous carbon nanocage derived from glucose adsorbed metal–organic framework is developed as the host for a sulfur cathode. This host structure combines the reported positive effects, including high conductivity, high sulfur loading, effective stress release, fast lithium‐ion kinetics, fast interface charge transport, fast redox of Li2Sn, and strong physical/chemical absorption, achieving a long cycle life (86% of capacity retention at 1C within 500 cycles) and high rate performance (600 mAh g−1 at 5C) for a Li–S battery. By combining experiments and density functional theoretical calculations, it is demonstrated that the well‐dispersed cobalt clusters play an important role in greatly improving the diffusion dynamics of lithium, and enhance the absorption and conversion capability of polysulfides in the host structure.

A flexible composite solid electrolyte membrane consisting of inorganic solid particles (Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3), polyethylene oxide (PEO), and boronized polyethylene glycol (BPEG) is prepared and investigated. This membrane exhibits good stability against lithium dendrite, which can be attributed to its well‐designed combination components: the compact inorganic lithium ion conducting layer provides the membrane with good mechanical strength and physically barricades the free growth of lithium dendrite; while the addition of planar BPEG oligomers not only disorganizes the crystallinity of the PEO domain, leading to good ionic conductivity, but also facilitates a “soft contact” between interfaces, which not only chemically enables homogeneous lithium plating/stripping on the lithium metal anode, but also reduces the polarization effects. In addition, by employing this membrane to a LiFePO4/Li cell and testing its galvanostatic cycling performances at 60 °C, capacities of 158.2 and 94.2 mA h g−1 are delivered at 0.1 C and 2 C, respectively.

No abstract

One of the biggest causes of degradation in lithium-ion batteries is elevated temperature. In this study we explored the effects of cell surface cooling and cell tab cooling, reproducing two typical cooling systems that are used in real-world battery packs. For new cells using slow-rate standardized testing, very little difference in capacity was seen. However, at higher rates, discharging the cell in just 10 minutes, surface cooling led to a loss of useable capacity of 9.2% compared to 1.2% for cell tab cooling. After cycling the cells for 1,000 times, surface cooling resulted in a rate of loss of useable capacity under load three times higher than cell tab cooling. We show that this is due to thermal gradients being perpendicular to the layers for surface cooling leading to higher local currents and faster degradation, but in-plane with the layers for tab cooling leading to more homogenous behavior. Understanding how thermal management systems interact with the operation of batteries is therefore critical in extending their performance. For automotive applications where 80% capacity is considered end-of-life, using tab cooling rather than surface cooling would therefore be equivalent to extending the lifetime of a pack by 3 times, or reducing the lifetime cost by 66%. Due to their high energy and power densities, Lithium-ion batteries are a very important component of electric vehicles, and their use has increased dramatically in recent years as the uptake of hybrid and electric vehicles has increased.1-3 One of the major challenges of using lithium-ion batteries in hybrid and electric vehicles is thermal management, 4 which is important in order to manage degradation at an acceptable rate whilst maximizing the performance of the batteries and reducing the risk of thermal runaway. 5-7Many studies have shown that increased temperature leads to an increase in the rate of degradation, 4,[8][9][10][11] therefore the effectiveness of a thermal management system is vital in order to maximize the lifetime performance of the pack. The design of a good thermal management system for a battery pack should consider both the overall temperature of the pack and both intra-cell and internal thermal gradients. Poor design of thermal management systems could be a major contributing factor in increasing degradation rates to unacceptable levels. 12There are many different techniques that can be used to thermally manage batteries in hybrid and electric vehicles. It is possible to use either air or liquid as the cooling medium, and both of these can be used in either a direct (with cooling medium in contact with the cell) or indirect way. In addition to this, different areas of the cell can be cooled, namely the surfaces of the cell or the cell tabs. 13,14 In general, systems employing air as the cooling medium are considered to be simpler and cheaper to implement, although the performance is limited especially in applications where there is a high heat generation rate or if the batteries are being operated in a high ambient tempe...

Lithium ion batteries are increasingly important in large scale applications where thermal management is critical for safety and lifetime. Yet, the effect of different thermal boundary conditions on the performance and lifetime is still not fully understood. In this work, a two-dimensional electro-thermal model is developed to simulate cell performance and internal states under complex thermal boundary conditions. Attention was paid to model, not only the electrode stack but also the non-core components (e.g. tab weld points) and thermal boundaries, but also the experiments required to parameterize the thermal model, and the reversible heat generation. The model is comprehensively validated and the performance of tab and surface cooling strategies was evaluated across a wide range of operating conditions. Surface cooling was shown to keep the cell at a lower average temperature, but with a large thermal gradient for high C rates. Tab cooling provided much smaller thermal gradients but higher average temperatures caused by lower heat removing ability. The thermal resistance between the current collectors and tabs was found to be the most significant heat transfer bottleneck and efforts to improve this could have significant positive impacts on the performance of li-ion batteries considering the other advantages of tab cooling.

Lithium-ion battery development is conventionally driven by energy and power density targets, yet the performance of a lithium-ion battery pack is often restricted by its heat rejection capabilities. It is therefore common to observe elevated cell temperatures and large internal thermal gradients which, given that impedance is a function of temperature, induce large current inhomogeneities and accelerate cell-level degradation. Battery thermal performance must be better quantified to resolve this limitation, but anisotropic thermal conductivity and uneven internal heat generation rates render conventional heat rejection measures, such as the Biot number, unsuitable. The Cell Cooling Coefficient (CCC) is introduced as a new metric which quantifies the rate of heat rejection. The CCC (units W.K −1) is constant for a given cell and thermal management method and is therefore ideal for comparing the thermal performance of different cell designs and form factors. By enhancing knowledge of pack-wide heat rejection, uptake of the CCC will also reduce the risk of thermal runaway. The CCC is presented as an essential tool to inform the cell down-selection process in the initial design phases, based solely on their thermal bottlenecks. This simple methodology has the potential to revolutionise the lithium-ion battery industry.