BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow-diverting stents can be used to treat intracranial aneurysms that are not amenable to treatment with coils. We analyzed ophthalmic consequences due to coverage of the origin of the ophthalmic artery by flow-diverting stents for the treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms.

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple therapy with intravitreal anti-vascular-endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF) antibody, dexamethasone and verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: Retrospective, comparative, interventional study. Records of treatment-naïve patients who received intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab in monotherapy or in combination with dexamethasone and full-fluence verteporfin PDT in triple therapy were reviewed. logMAR visual acuity, foveal thickness (FT) on optical coherence tomography, intraocular pressure and endophthalmitis occurrence were recorded. Results: Sixty-one eyes were included in the triple-therapy group, 40 eyes were included in the monotherapy group. The mean follow-up was 14.1 ± 3.4 months in the triple-therapy group and 16.3 ± 4.1 months in the monotherapy group. The triple-therapy group enjoyed a lower total number of treatments (1.92 ± 0.44 vs. 3.12 ± 0.37, p < 0.001) and a longer time before first retreatment (5.4 ± 3.3 vs. 3.6 ± 2.5 months, p = 0.001). A significant improvement of visual acuity and FT was present in both groups during the 12 months following first treatment. No adverse effects were observed. Conclusion: The combination of intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumabwith dexamethasone and full-fluence PDT for exudative AMD provided visual and anatomic improvement and a good safety profile. Triple therapy may reduce the number of retreatments when compared to anti-VEGF alone.

Short-term results suggest that subconjunctival bevacizumab can be used safely and effectively for corneal neovascularization resulting from different ocular surface disorders, providing an additional strategy to improve success of corneal grafts.

Purpose To evaluate the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab injections in patients with corneal neovascularization resulting from different ocular surface disorders. Methods Prospective case series. Fourteen eyes of 13 patients with corneal neovascularization caused by different ocular surface disorders, such as healed corneal ulcers, long‐standing chronic inflammatory diseases and corneal ischaemia secondary to burn were included. All eyes received a single subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg (0.1 ml) bevacizumab. Morphological changes in neovascularization were evaluated during 3 months using slit‐lamp biomicroscopy, corneal digital photography, and computed‐assisted semi‐automatic analysis of corneal neovascularization area. Results Recession of corneal vessels was observed in all eyes at 1 week post‐injection. The surface of the neovascular tree continued to decrease noticeably for one month and then increased again for the remainder of the follow‐up period. The corneal neovascularization area amounted to 12.14± 4.38% of the corneal surface pre‐injection, compared with 9.10± 3.16% post‐injection (p=0.02), reflecting a mean decrease in corneal neovascularization of 25 %. No local or systemic adverse events possibly related to subconjunctival bevacizumab injection were observed. Conclusion Short‐term results suggest that subconjunctival bevacizumab can be used safely and effectively for corneal neovascularization resulting from different ocular surface disorders, providing an additional strategy to improve success of corneal grafts.

No abstract

SummaryPurpose: the aim of our study was to assess the potential of combined intratendinous injection of an anti-angiogenic drug: bevacizumab (AA) and Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) to treat tendinopathy in a murine model of patellar and Achilles tendinopathy, and to evaluate its local toxicity. Material and method: twenty rats (80 patellar and Achilles tendons) were used for the study. We induced tendinosis (T+) in 80 tendons (patellar=40 and Achilles=40) by injecting under ultrasonography (US) guidance Collagenase 1® (day 0 = D0). Clinical examination was performed at D3, immediately followed by either PRP and AA (AAPRPT+, n=40) or PRP (PRPT+ n=40, control) US-guided intratendinous injection. Follow-up at D6, D18 and D25 using clinical, US and histology, and comparison between the 2 groups were performed. To study AA+PRP toxicity, we looked for necrosis or rupture on the 40 AAPRPT+. Results: all AAPRPT+ showed better joint mobilization compared to PRPT+ at D6 (p=0.03), D18 (p=0.04) and D25 (p=0.02). Similar results were found regarding US and histology, with smaller collagen fiber diameters (D6, p≤0.017, D25, p≤0.015), less disorganization and fewer neovessels (D25, p=0.004) in AAPRPT+ compared to PRPT+. No AA+PRP local toxicity was discovered in histology assessment. Conclusion: our study suggests that combined injection of AA and PRP in tendinosis accelerates and improves tendon's healing compared PRP used alone, with no local toxicity.