Objective: This study was designed to explore the protective effect of 2,3,5, 4′-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-β-D-glucoside (TSG) against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury-induced cardiomyocytes apoptosis. Methods: The H9c2 cell I/R injury model was induced by simultaneous shortage of nutrients and oxygen. TSG administration (0.10, 0.25, and 0.50 mM) was performed before and during I/R stimulation. Cell apoptosis was evaluated using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay. Expression of cell-related proteins was detected to assess the effect of TSG on cell apoptosis. Results: I/R injury induced significant cell apoptosis. Significantly decreased Bcl-2 and increased Bax, caspase-3, and p-Akt expression (P < 0.01) was detected in the cell model of I/R injury. In contrast, TSG administration eliminated all the changes induced by I/R injury in a dose-dependent manner. Compared with the H9c2 cell model of I/R injury, the H9c2 cells treated with 0.50 mM TSG showed the lowest cell apoptosis percentage, the highest expression of Bcl-2, and the lowest expression of Bax, caspase-3, and p-Akt (P < 0.01). Conclusion: We confirmed that the protective effect of TSG against I/R injuryinduced cell apoptosis in H9c2 in vitro was associated with the Bcl-2/Bax ratio, caspase-3, and Akt activation. K E Y W O R D S 2,3,5,4'-Tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-β-D-glucoside, apoptosis, H9c2, ischemia/reperfusion
ObjectivesTo compare the long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs) for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).MethodsCoronary artery disease patients with decreased kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2) who underwent CABG (n = 533) or PCI with DES (n = 952) from 2013 to 2020 were enrolled at a single center. The baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the CABG and PCI groups for each matched pair of patients with CKD. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of all-cause death. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCEs) such as death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and repeat revascularization.ResultsA total of 1,485 patients underwent revascularization, such as 533 CABG and 952 patients with PCI. The median follow-up duration was 55.6 months (interquartile range 34.3–74.7 months). Multivariable Cox regression models were used for risk adjustment, and after propensity score matching (PSM), 399 patients were well matched in each group. The in-hospital mortality rate in the CABG group was higher than that in the PCI group, but the difference was not statistically significant (5.0 vs. 2.5%, p = 0.063). At the 1-year follow-up, CABG was associated with a lower survival rate than PCI (94.2 vs. 98.0%, hazard ratio [HR] of 3.72, 95% CI = 1.63–8.49, p < 0.01). At the end of the 5-year follow-up, the freedom from MI and the freedom from repeated revascularization were both better in the CABG group compared to the PCI group (89.1 vs. 81.7%, HR of 0.59, 95% CI = 0.38–0.92, p = 0.019; 86.9 vs. 73.8%, HR of 0.54, 95% CI = 0.36–0.81, p = 0.003, respectively). Furthermore, the freedom from MACCEs was also better in the patients of CABG compared with the patients of PCI (58.5 vs. 51.3%, HR of 0.71, 95% CI = 0.55–0.91, p = 0.030). CABG had a higher cumulative survival rate (68.4 vs. 66.0%) but without a statistically significant difference (HR of 0.92, 95% CI = 0.67–1.27, p = 0.602) compared with that of PCI.ConclusionsCompared to the use of PCI with a drug-eluting stent among patients with CKD, the use of CABG was associated with a lower MI rate, repeat revascularization rate, and lower number of MACCEs during the long-term follow-up. At a follow-up of 1 year, the number of MACCEs and other adverse events were comparable between the two cohorts, but CABG showed a lower survival rate than PCI.
Background and Aim of the Study: Many studies support that the no-touch (NT) procedure can improve the patency rate of vein grafts. However, it is not clear that the sequential vein graft early expansion in the NT technique during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study will explore this issue.Methods: This was a prospective single-center randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 100 patients undergoing off-pump CABG with the sequential saphenous graft were randomly assigned to two groups: the NT and conventional (CON) groups. Perioperative and postoperative data were collected during the hospital stay. The mean diameter of sequential grafts was measured using cardiac computed tomography angiography 3 months after the operation.Results: There was a significant difference in the average diameter of sequential grafts between the two groups (NT: [2.98 ± 0.42], CON: [3.26 ± 0.51], p = .005). There was no difference in occlusion of sequential venous grafts between the two groups (NT: 4/48 [8.3%], CON: 5/49 [10.2%], p = 1.000). There were differences in surgery time between the two groups (NT: 220 [188,240], CON: 190 [175,230], p = .009). Conclusions:The sequential graft early expansion in the NT technique is not as pronounced as that in the conventional technique, which may have a long-term protective effect on the grafts.cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA), conventional saphenous vein graft harvesting, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), no-touch saphenous vein graft harvesting, off-pump CABG, sequential saphenous vein graftingThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
BackgroundIn the mid-1990s, the Swedish expert team proposed saphenous vein graft (SVG) harvesting with pedicle tissue. The short-term and long-term patency rates of the great saphenous vein obtained by the no-touch (NT) were higher than those obtained by the conventional (CON). In the past, NT harvesting was mainly used in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and vein grafts were mostly single vein grafts. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the safety and effectiveness of sequential vein grafts using NT harvesting in off-pump CABG.MethodsFrom 2017 to 2019, a total of 505 patients were included in the study. There were 150 patients in the NT group and 355 patients in the CON group. After applying propensity score matching (1:1 matching), 148 patients were included in each group. Baseline data, graft patency, post-operative complications, leg wound complications and 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the patency rate of sequential venous grafts between the two groups 1 year after the operation either before [NT: 7.1% (10/141) vs. CON: 11.5% (38/331), p = 0.149) or after matching (NT: 7.1% (10/140) vs. CON: 7.3% (9/124), p = 0.971]. There was no significant difference in the composite clinical endpoint between the two groups either before [NT: 3 (2.3%) vs. CON: 9 (2.8%), p = 1.000] or after matching [NT: 3 (2.3%) vs. CON: 3 (2.5%), p = 1.000]. There were differences in leg wound complications between the two groups both before [NT: 9 (6.9%) vs. CON: 6 (1.9%), p = 0.007] and after matching [NT: 9 (6.9%) vs. CON: 2 (1.7%), p = 0.043].ConclusionsThe application of the NT harvesting in off-pump CABG with sequential vein grafts is safe and effective. NT method has disadvantages in leg wound.
Objective To evaluate the safety and cost of early discharge compared with ordinary discharge in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 474 patients with DM who were discharged from hospital following PCI at a regional center between 2012 and 2015. Results A total of 192 patients (40.5%) were included in the early discharge group and 282 patients (59.5%) were included in the ordinary group. Mortality and morbidity after PCI were recorded. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed similar prognosis between the two groups at 30 days and at 1 year after discharge. However, hospitalization expenses for the regular discharge group were significantly higher than those of the early discharge group (RMB65,750 vs. RMB50,983). Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that early discharge of patients with DM following PCI for acute coronary syndrome is safe compared with ordinary discharge, and may reduce hospitalization costs.
ObjectivesAims to compare the contemporary and long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD).Methods823 CAD patients with advanced CKD (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) were collected, including 247 patients who underwent CABG and 576 patients received PCI from January 2014 to February 2021. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. The secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and revascularization.ResultsMultivariable Cox regression models were used and propensity score matching (PSM) was also performed. After PSM, the 30-day mortality rate in the CABG group was higher than that in the PCI group but without statistically significant (6.6% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.24). During the first year, patients referred for CABG had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.42 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.41–3.01] for mortality compared with PCI. At the end of the 5-year follow-up, CABG group had a HR of 0.58 (95%CI, 0.38–0.86) for repeat revascularization, a HR of 0.77 (95%CI, 0.52–1.14) for survival rate and a HR of 0.88(95%CI, 0.56–1.18) for MACCEs as compared to PCI.ConclusionsAmong patients with CAD and advanced CKD who underwent CABG or PCI, the all-cause mortality and MACCEs were comparable between the two groups in 30 days, 1-year and 5 years. However, CABG was only associated with a significantly lower risk for repeat revascularization compared with PCI at 5 years follow-up.
Background and aim of the study: Elderly patients are more likely to have adverse complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There are few studies on the risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) after surgery in elderly patients, especially in the Asian population. This study retrospectively analysed the risk factors for AKI in Chinese elderly patients after CABG and established a risk prediction model to detect these risk factors early and take active intervention measures. Methods: A total of 432 patients were included in this study from 2018 to 2019. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. The patients were divided into an AKI group and a non-AKI group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the factors with p < 0.05. Results: Out of 432 patients in the study, 119 (27.5%) developed AKI. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), ≥3 coronary anastomoses, preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) implantation and prolonged ventilation time were independent risk factors for AKI. The area under the ROC curve was 0.702 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.643-0.761], p < 0.001). Conclusions: The eGFR, ≥3 coronary anastomoses, preoperative IABP implantation and prolonged ventilation time are independent risk factors for AKI in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Early discovery of these risk factors and the implementation of appropriate intervention measures are useful to reduce the occurrence of AKI after CABG and improve the prognosis of patients.
Background In the mid-1990s, the Swedish expert team proposed saphenous vein graft (SVG) harvesting with pedicle tissue. The short-term and long-term patency rates of the great saphenous vein obtained by the no-touch technique (NT) were higher than those obtained by the conventional technique (CON). In the past, NT technology was mainly used in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and vein grafts were mostly single vein grafts. In this study, we retrospectively analysed the safety and effectiveness of sequential vein grafts using NT technology in off-pump CABG. Methods From 2017 to 2019, a total of 505 patients were included in the study. There were 150 patients in the NT group and 355 patients in the CON group. After applying propensity score matching (1:1 matching), 148 patients were included in each group. Baseline data, graft patency, postoperative complications, leg wound complications and 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the patency rate of sequential venous grafts between the two groups one year after the operation either before (NT: 7.1% (10/141) vs CON: 11.5% (38/331), p = 0.149) or after matching (NT: 7.1% (10/140) vs CON: 7.3% (9/124), p = 0.971). There was no significant difference in the composite clinical endpoint between the two groups either before (NT: 3 (2.3%) vs CON: 9 (2.8%), p = 1.000) or after matching (NT: 3 (2.3%) vs CON: 3 (2.5%), p = 1.000). There were differences in leg wound complications between the two groups both before (NT: 9 (6.9%) vs CON: 6 (1.9%), p = 0.007) and after matching (NT: 9 (6.9%) vs CON: 2 (1.7%), p = 0.043). Conclusions The application of the NT technique in off-pump CABG with sequential vein grafts is safe and effective. Leg wound complications are more common with the NT technique than with the conventional technique.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.