Objective: This study was designed to explore the protective effect of 2,3,5, 4′-tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-β-D-glucoside (TSG) against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury-induced cardiomyocytes apoptosis. Methods: The H9c2 cell I/R injury model was induced by simultaneous shortage of nutrients and oxygen. TSG administration (0.10, 0.25, and 0.50 mM) was performed before and during I/R stimulation. Cell apoptosis was evaluated using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay. Expression of cell-related proteins was detected to assess the effect of TSG on cell apoptosis. Results: I/R injury induced significant cell apoptosis. Significantly decreased Bcl-2 and increased Bax, caspase-3, and p-Akt expression (P < 0.01) was detected in the cell model of I/R injury. In contrast, TSG administration eliminated all the changes induced by I/R injury in a dose-dependent manner. Compared with the H9c2 cell model of I/R injury, the H9c2 cells treated with 0.50 mM TSG showed the lowest cell apoptosis percentage, the highest expression of Bcl-2, and the lowest expression of Bax, caspase-3, and p-Akt (P < 0.01). Conclusion: We confirmed that the protective effect of TSG against I/R injuryinduced cell apoptosis in H9c2 in vitro was associated with the Bcl-2/Bax ratio, caspase-3, and Akt activation. K E Y W O R D S 2,3,5,4'-Tetrahydroxystilbene-2-O-β-D-glucoside, apoptosis, H9c2, ischemia/reperfusion
ObjectivesTo compare the long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs) for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).MethodsCoronary artery disease patients with decreased kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2) who underwent CABG (n = 533) or PCI with DES (n = 952) from 2013 to 2020 were enrolled at a single center. The baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the CABG and PCI groups for each matched pair of patients with CKD. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of all-cause death. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCEs) such as death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and repeat revascularization.ResultsA total of 1,485 patients underwent revascularization, such as 533 CABG and 952 patients with PCI. The median follow-up duration was 55.6 months (interquartile range 34.3–74.7 months). Multivariable Cox regression models were used for risk adjustment, and after propensity score matching (PSM), 399 patients were well matched in each group. The in-hospital mortality rate in the CABG group was higher than that in the PCI group, but the difference was not statistically significant (5.0 vs. 2.5%, p = 0.063). At the 1-year follow-up, CABG was associated with a lower survival rate than PCI (94.2 vs. 98.0%, hazard ratio [HR] of 3.72, 95% CI = 1.63–8.49, p < 0.01). At the end of the 5-year follow-up, the freedom from MI and the freedom from repeated revascularization were both better in the CABG group compared to the PCI group (89.1 vs. 81.7%, HR of 0.59, 95% CI = 0.38–0.92, p = 0.019; 86.9 vs. 73.8%, HR of 0.54, 95% CI = 0.36–0.81, p = 0.003, respectively). Furthermore, the freedom from MACCEs was also better in the patients of CABG compared with the patients of PCI (58.5 vs. 51.3%, HR of 0.71, 95% CI = 0.55–0.91, p = 0.030). CABG had a higher cumulative survival rate (68.4 vs. 66.0%) but without a statistically significant difference (HR of 0.92, 95% CI = 0.67–1.27, p = 0.602) compared with that of PCI.ConclusionsCompared to the use of PCI with a drug-eluting stent among patients with CKD, the use of CABG was associated with a lower MI rate, repeat revascularization rate, and lower number of MACCEs during the long-term follow-up. At a follow-up of 1 year, the number of MACCEs and other adverse events were comparable between the two cohorts, but CABG showed a lower survival rate than PCI.
Background and Aim of the Study: Many studies support that the no-touch (NT) procedure can improve the patency rate of vein grafts. However, it is not clear that the sequential vein graft early expansion in the NT technique during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study will explore this issue.Methods: This was a prospective single-center randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 100 patients undergoing off-pump CABG with the sequential saphenous graft were randomly assigned to two groups: the NT and conventional (CON) groups. Perioperative and postoperative data were collected during the hospital stay. The mean diameter of sequential grafts was measured using cardiac computed tomography angiography 3 months after the operation.Results: There was a significant difference in the average diameter of sequential grafts between the two groups (NT: [2.98 ± 0.42], CON: [3.26 ± 0.51], p = .005). There was no difference in occlusion of sequential venous grafts between the two groups (NT: 4/48 [8.3%], CON: 5/49 [10.2%], p = 1.000). There were differences in surgery time between the two groups (NT: 220 [188,240], CON: 190 [175,230], p = .009). Conclusions:The sequential graft early expansion in the NT technique is not as pronounced as that in the conventional technique, which may have a long-term protective effect on the grafts.cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA), conventional saphenous vein graft harvesting, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), no-touch saphenous vein graft harvesting, off-pump CABG, sequential saphenous vein graftingThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.