No abstract

The chemical modification of RNA is a newly discovered epigenetic regulation mechanism in cells and plays a crucial role in a variety of biological processes. N6-methyladenine (m6A) mRNA modification is the most abundant form of posttranscriptional RNA modification in eukaryotes. Through the development of m6A RNA sequencing, the relevant molecular mechanism of m6A modification has gradually been revealed. It has been found that the effect of m6A modification on RNA metabolism involves processing, nuclear export, translation and even decay. As the most common malignant tumour of the central nervous system, gliomas (especially glioblastoma) have a very poor prognosis, and treatment efficacy is not ideal even with the application of high-intensity treatment measures of surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy. Exploring the origin and development mechanisms of tumour cells from the perspective of tumour biogenesis has always been a hotspot in the field of glioma research. Emerging evidence suggests that m6A modification can play a key role in gliomas through a variety of mechanisms, providing more possibilities for early diagnosis and targeted therapy of gliomas. The aim of the present review is to focus on the research progress regarding the association between m6A modification and gliomas. And to provide a theoretical basis according to the currently available literature for further exploring this association. This review may provide new insights for the molecular mechanism, early diagnosis, histologic grading, targeted therapy and prognostic evaluation of gliomas.

Aim: This review aims to systematically describe the biogenesis and degradation of circular RNAs (circRNAs), discusses the major functions of circRNAs, introduces the mechanisms by which circRNAs play a role in cancer, comprehensively summarize the relationship between circRNAs and anticarcinogen resistance as well as underlying specific mechanisms in multiple cancers. Materials & methods: We screened and analyzed large quantity of scientific papers which associated with circRNAs, noncoding RNAs, function, cancer, drug resistance and chemoresistance, and then summarized in Figures 1 & 2 & Table 1. Results & conclusion: The biogenesis, degradation and function of circRNAs are specially compared with other noncoding RNAs, it can affect cancer pathogenesis and progression and are implicated in mediating resistance to various anticarcinogens in various types of cancer.

Exosomes are nanoscale phospholipid bilayer vesicles that can be artificially engineered into vectors for the treatment of cancer. Circular RNA (circRNA), a type of non-coding RNA, has crucial regulatory functions in various aspects of cancer, such as tumorigenesis, apoptosis, proliferation, invasion, metastasis and chemo-and radiotherapeutic resistance, as well as in cancer prognosis. Notably, the exosomal transfer of circRNAs may function to both promote and inhibit cancer. Numerous studies have addressed the importance of circRNAs in cancer and non-coding RNAs (such as microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs) in exosomes. However, little research has focussed on a class of RNAs called exosomal circRNAs. The present review discusses current studies regarding exosomal circRNAs, including their biogenesis and biological functions, their abundance in exosomes and possible sorting mechanisms and their potential roles in both promoting and inhibiting cancer. It is predicted that in the next five years there will be increasing research exploring the functional mechanisms of exosomal circRNA in various diseases, in particular their roles in cancer genesis and progression.

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide manifesting high morbidity and mortality. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), important components of the tumor microenvironment, are essential for tumorigenesis and progression. Exosomes secreted from CAFs have been reported as the critical molecule-vehicle in intercellular crosstalk. However, the precise mechanism underlying the effect of CAFs remains to be fully investigated. In this study, we aimed to determine the role of CAFs and their exosomes in the progression of GC and related mechanisms. The results revealed that miRNA-34 was downregulated in both GC fibroblasts (GCFs) and GC cell lines while the overexpression of miRNA-34 suppressed the proliferation, invasion, and motility of GC cell lines. Coculturing GC cells with miRNA-34-overexpressing GCFs led to the suppression of cancer progression. Also, exosomes derived from GCFs were taken up by GC cells in vitro and in vivo and exerted antitumor roles in GC. In addition, exosomal miRNA-34 inhibited GC cell proliferation and invasion in vitro and suppressed tumor growth in vivo. Furthermore, 16 genes were identified as potential downstream targeting genes of miRNA-34. Taken together, GCFs-derived exosomal miRNA-34 may be a promising targeting molecule for therapeutic strategies in GC.

Glioma is the most common primary tumour of the central nervous system, and is associated with a high postoperative recurrence rate and resistance to chemotherapy. High-grade glioblastoma in particular has a very poor prognosis and poses a serious threat to human health. Related studies have confirmed that the occurrence and development of gliomas are closely associated with the abnormal expression and regulation of genes. Moreover, the number of studies on the association of the expression of non-coding RNAs [linear RNAs, microRNAs and circular RNAs (circRNAs)] in human cells with glioma has been gradually increasing in recent years. Among those, circRNAs, previously considered to be 'splicing errors', have been shown to be highly expressed in eukaryotic cells and regulate the biological behaviour of gliomas. circRNAs are highly abundant and stable, and have become a research hotspot in the field of glioma molecular biology. The aim of the present review was to focus on the research progress regarding the association between circRNA expression and gliomas, and to provide a theoretical basis according to the currently available literature for further exploring this association. The present study may be of value for the early diagnosis, pathological grading, targeted therapy and prognostic evaluation of gliomas.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have a critical regulatory function in human glioma. However, novel circRNAs related to different pathological grades of glioma and their crucial potential function are worth screening and prediction. CircRNA expression profiling was performed for 6 paired high- and low-grade glioma tissues and 5 adjacent normal brain tissues through next-generation sequencing. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted to validate circRNA expression. Bioinformatics analysis was performed, and circRNA-miRNA-mRNA networks were constructed. The expression and survival data of miRNAs and target genes were examined by GEPIA, Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA), ONCOMINE, and cBioPortal databases. The RNA binding proteins (RBPs), open reading frames (ORFs) and N6-methyladenosine (m 6 A) modifications of the identified circRNAs were also predicted. Through multilevel research screening, 4 circRNAs (hsa_circ_0000915, hsa_circ_0127664, hsa_circ_0008362, and hsa_circ_0001467) were associated with glioma of different pathological grades and could be preferred candidates for subsequent functional analysis. Therefore, circRNAs are associated with the different pathological grades of glioma and reveal their potential critical regulatory function. CircRNAs might provide vital molecular biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for glioma.

This research systematically profiled the global N6‐methyladenosine modification pattern of circular RNAs (circRNAs) in glioblastoma (GBM). Based on RNA methylation sequencing (MeRIP sequencing or N6‐methyladenosine sequencing) and RNA sequencing, we described the N6‐methyladenosine modification status and gene expression of circRNAs in GBM and normal brain tissues. N6‐methyladenosine–related circRNAs were immunoprecipitated and validated by real‐time quantitative PCR. Bioinformatics analysis and related screening were carried out. Compared with those of the NC group, the circRNAs from GBM exhibited 1370 new N6‐methyladenosine peaks and 1322 missing N6‐methyladenosine peaks. Among the loci associated with altered N6‐methyladenosine peaks, 1298 were up‐regulated and 1905 were down‐regulated. The N6‐methyladenosine level tended to be positively correlated with circRNA expression. Bioinformatics analysis was used to predict the biological function of N6‐methyladenosine–modified circRNAs and the corresponding signalling pathways. In addition, through PCR validation combined with clinical data mining, we identified five molecules of interest (BUB1, C1S, DTHD1, F13A1 and NDC80) that could be initial candidates for further study of the function and mechanism of N6‐methyladenosine–mediated GBM development. In conclusion, our findings demonstrated the N6‐methyladenosine modification pattern of circRNAs in human GBM, revealing the possible roles of N6‐methyladenosine–mediated novel noncoding RNAs in the origin and progression of GBM.