By using orthogonal regression method, a systematic comparison is made between surface wave magnitudes determined by Institute of Geophysics of China Earthquake Administration (IGCEA) and National Earthquake Information Center of US Geological Survey (USGS/NEIC) on the basis of observation data collected by the two institutions between 1983 and 2004. A formula is obtained which reveals the relationship between surface wave magnitudes determined by China seismograph network and US seismograph network. The result shows that, as different calculation formulae and observational instruments are used, surface wave magnitude determined by IGCEA is generally greater by 0.2 than that determined by NEIC: for M=3.5~4.5 earthquakes, it is greater by 0.3; for M=5.0~6.5 earthquakes, it is greater by 0.2; and for M≥7.0 earthquakes, it is greater by no more than 0.1.
By linear regression and orthogonal regression methods, comparisons are made between different magnitudes (local magnitude M L , surface wave magnitudes M S and M S7 , long-period body wave magnitude m B and short-period body wave magnitude m b ) determined by Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, on the basis of observation data collected by China Seismograph Network between 1983 and 2004. Empirical relations between different magnitudes have been obtained. The result shows that: 1 As different magnitude scales reflect radiated energy by seismic waves within different periods, earthquake magnitudes can be described more objectively by using different scales for earthquakes of different magnitudes. When the epicentral distance is less than 1 000 km, local magnitude M L can be a preferable scale; In case M<4.5, there is little difference between the magnitude scales; In case 4.5M S , i.e., M S underestimates magnitudes of such events, therefore, m B can be a better choice; In case M>6.0, M S >m B >m b , both m B and m b underestimate the magnitudes, so M S is a preferable scale for determining magnitudes of such events (6.08.5, a saturation phenomenon appears in M S , which cannot give an accurate reflection of the magnitudes of such large events; 2 In China, when the epicentral distance is less than 1 000 km, there is almost no difference between M L and M S , and thus there is no need to convert between the two magnitudes in practice; 3 Although M S and M S7 are both surface wave magnitudes, M S is in general greater than M S7 by 0.2~0.3 magnitude, because different instruments and calculation formulae are used; 4 m B is almost equal to m b for earthquakes around m B 4.0, but m B is larger than m b for those of m B ≥4.5, because the periods of seismic waves used for measuring m B and m b are different though the calculation formulae are the same.
By using orthogonal regression method, a systematic comparison is made between body wave magnitudes determined by Institute of Geophysics of China Earthquake Administration (IGCEA) and National Earthquake Information Center of US Geological Survey (USGS/NEIC) on the basis of observation data from China and US seismograph networks between 1983 and 2004. The result of orthogonal regression shows no systematic error between body wave magnitude mb determined by IGCEA and mb (NEIC). Provided that mb (NEIC) is taken as the benchmark, body wave magnitude determined by IGCEA is greater by 0.2-0.1 than the magnitude determined by NEIC for M=3.5~4.5 earthquakes; for M=5.0~5.5 earthquakes, there is no difference; and for M'd_6.0 earthquakes, it is smaller by no more than 0.2. This is consistent with the result of comparison by IDC (International Data Center).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.