2007
DOI: 10.1785/0120060078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chinese National Network Magnitudes, Their Relation to NEIC Magnitudes, and Recommendations for New IASPEI Magnitude Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a comparison between M JMA and M s , Tsuboi [] and Bormann et al . [] found negligible differences between these two scales with a magnitude ranging from 4 to 8. Therefore, in this work, both types of magnitudes are simply denoted as M .…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…From a comparison between M JMA and M s , Tsuboi [] and Bormann et al . [] found negligible differences between these two scales with a magnitude ranging from 4 to 8. Therefore, in this work, both types of magnitudes are simply denoted as M .…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The correction for the propagation path effects is accomplished by applying spectral amplitude decay functions for different periods, that have been computed using numerical simulations of Green's functions based on the reference Earth model AK135Q. Our procedure avoids the problem of the time window saturation effect in magnitude determination [ Bormann et al , 2007] and can be implemented in rapid response systems since it allows to properly determine Me within minutes of the first P‐wave arrival, even for great earthquakes with very long rupture duration, such as the 26 December 2004 Sumatra earthquake. We applied our procedure to 61 recent earthquakes and showed that our Me determinations agree on average reasonably well with the more formal and accurate but slower Me determined by the USGS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The homogenization of magnitude of earthquake catalogues is very important to shift all earthquakes in one common magnitude scale to interpret earthquake size characterization and associated phenomenon. In order to homogenize the magnitude, we correlated different magnitude reported for same earthquake recorded in these three catalogues and derived some regionspecific empirical relationship between different magnitude scales (Bormann et al 2007). In this work, the moment magnitude (M w ) scale is selected as the representative homogeneous scale for each recorded seismic event.…”
Section: Data Source and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%