Fertilizer effects on methane emission from Chinese rice fields were investigated by a praxis‐oriented approach applying balanced amendments of N, P and K. The data set obtained covered the emission rates of app. one month in early rice and one month in late rice 1991. An intercomparison between the 4 treatments showed pronounced differences in the magnitudes of methane emission rates. The combined organic/mineral fertilizer application, commonly used as local farming practice, resulted in relatively high seasonal averages of methane emission rates (26.5 mg CH4 m−2 h−1 in early rice and 50.1 mg CH4 m−2 h−1 in late rice). The lowest emission rates were observed in the plot with pure mineral fertilization (6.5 mg CH4 m−2 h−1 in early rice and 14.3 mg CH4 m−2 h−1 in late rice). Pure organic fertilizers by unfermented substances yielded the highest methane emission rates of all field trials (38.6 mg CH4 m−2 h−1 in early rice and 56.2 CH4 m−2 h−1 in late rice). The fertilization with fermented material derived from biogas generators resulted in substantially lower emission rates than the other trials with organic amendments, the seasonal averages corresponded to 15.9 mg CH4 m−2 h−1 (early rice) and 22.5 mg CH4 m−2 h−1 (late rice). Interpretation of the results can be obtained from the different potentials of these fertilizers for methane production. Based on this concept the different methane emission rates observed with organic/mineral, pure mineral and pure unfermented‐organic fertilizers could directly be attributed to the different quantities of organic matter incorporated into the soil. The low methane emission from the plot treated with fermented material could be explained by a depletion of potential methane precursors resulting from the preceding fermentation. The results of this investigation provide evidence that the extensive use of specific chemical fertilizers and the application of sludge from the operation of biogas generators could lead to a net reduction of the methane emission from rice fields.
Rice cultivation has been challenged by increasing food demand and water scarcity. We examined the responses of water use, grain yield, and water productivity to various modes of field water managements in Chinese double rice systems. Four treatments were studied in a long-term field experiment (1998–2015): continuous flooding (CF), flooding—midseason drying—flooding (F-D-F), flooding—midseason drying—intermittent irrigation without obvious standing water (F-D-S), and flooding—rain-fed (F-RF). The average precipitation was 483 mm in early-rice season and 397 mm in late-rice season. The irrigated water for CF, F-D-F, F-D-S, and F-RF, respectively, was 263, 340, 279, and 170 mm in early-rice season, and 484, 528, 422, and 206 mm in late-rice season. Grain yield for CF, F-D-F, F-D-S, and F-RF, respectively, was 4,722, 4,597, 4,479, and 4,232 kgha-1 in early-rice season, and 5,420, 5,402, 5,366, and 4,498 kgha-1 in late-rice season. Compared with CF, F-D-F consumed more irrigated water, which still decreased grain yield, leading to a decrease in water productivity by 25% in early-rice season and by 8% in late-rice season. Compared with F-D-F, F-D-S saved much irrigated water with a small yield reduction, leading to an increase in water productivity by 22% in early-rice season and by 26% in late-rice season. The results indicate that CF is best for early-rice and FDS is best for late-rice in terms of grain yield and water productivity.
An experiment was performed to study gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to various regimes, such as flooding-midseason drying-flooding (FDF), flooding-midseason drying-saturation (FDS), and flooding-rain-fed (FR) regimes. Compared to FDF, FR resulted in an obvious decrease in net photosynthetic rate (P N ), due to the decrease in stomatal conductance and the increase in stomatal limitation. In contrast, FDS plants did not suffer stomatal limitation and had comparable P N with FDF plants. For diurnal light-saturated electron transport rate and saturation irradiance, FDF performed the best, which was followed by FDS and FR successively. FR and FDS plants tended to suffer from midday depression. FDS reduced irrigated water by 17.2% compared to FDF for comparable yields. The results suggested that FDS can be an effective irrigation regime to save water.
In the hilly areas of southern China, uplands and paddies are located adjacent to each other. Using rice straw as mulch for upland soil may improve crop production and partially replace chemical fertilizers, which may mitigate NO emissions. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of rice straw mulching for mitigating NO emissions and increasing crop production. The treatments included no mulching (CK), 5000 kg ha of straw mulching (SM5), and 10,000 kg ha of straw mulching (SM10). Moreover, all the treatments received equivalent amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from chemical fertilizers plus rice straw. Relative to CK, cumulative NO emissions decreased by 23.1 and 33.5% with SM5 and SM10, respectively. Significant positive correlations were observed between NO fluxes and soil water-filled pore space (WPFS) (r = 0.495, P< 0.05) and between seasonal cumulative NO fluxes and the chemical N fertilization rate (r = 0.814, P< 0.05). These findings indicate that soil WPFS was the key environmental factor in NO emissions and that the substitution of chemical nitrogen fertilizer with rice straw was the main driver of NO mitigation. Relative to CK, the maize yield increased by 16.5 and 29.6% with SM5 and SM10, respectively, which can be attributed primarily to the increases in soil moisture. The chemical fertilizer input could be decreased and NO emissions could be mitigated through straw mulching, while achieving improved crop yield. This management strategy has great potential, and this study provides an important reference for low-carbon agriculture.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.